Будет еще одна кочерга?
- Конечно будет57%
- Не будет4%
- 100% будет, но не точно39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@ALMCorpTrade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
189subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002017455058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ALMCorpTrade |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ALMCorpTrade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 189 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 190 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 192 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 194 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 194 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 April 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 189 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
185 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 34.1% | |
| 🔥 | 52 | 28.1% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 4.32% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 4.32% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 2.16% | |
| 🤪 | 4 | 2.16% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.541% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.541% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.541% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Будет еще одна кочерга?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Наблюдая за тем, как всё это происходило на истории, реально страшно становится - что же нас ждёт в обозримом будущем... Осенью уже год с той самой огромной кочерги. И судя по всему, люди только-только начали отходить от тех крупных потерь, что были в октябре 2025-го. И что они подумают, если увидят биток по 30–40к? Сразу мысли: а где тогда будет альта?.. Ну его нафиг, этот трейдинг. Но неужели всё сводится только …
🤔5❤3🔥2
Всем привет! Кто бы что ни говорил, но рынок не поставил глобальное дно, судя по этой метрике. А вы что думаете? В целом у меня будто бы и по вееру напрашивается продолжение вниз. Само собой может через отскоки.
👍7
Всем привет. В Antarctic wallet теперь можно создать себе виртуальную зарубежную карту. Можно привязать ее к эпл пэй например и платить за границей. Это особенно актуально для Россиян, кто часто путешествует и не хочет возиться с наличными в других странах. Присоединяетесь
🔥7
Вот предварительное видео. Оно поможет нам отсеять игроков в казино от тех, кто пришел зарабатывать в трейдинг, пусть пока и безуспешно😌 Все поправимо. Смотрим, слушаем, и идем заниматься. Всех обнял🫶🏻 @AnD_Alex_Meta
❤11❤🔥3🔥3
Доброе утро) Фандинг опять вылез за 50, в то же время мы дошли до весьма крупных лимитов. Перевес по силам сейчас очевидный. Продавец истощен, а покупателя много, как никогда. Пришли к первой крупной лимитке. Отскок может быть. Смущает лишь то, что лимитный покупатель как то через чур объемов наставил внизу на глубине 25%. То есть с текущей цены до условных 45к по битку есть много заявок на покупку. И вот вопрос, …
🔥6❤4👍3
Всем привет! Не так давно я выкладывал видео, где бегло сравнил двух трейдеров — Джесси Ливермора и Брюса Ковнера, а после рассказал о важных психологических пороках 99% трейдеров. Видео можно посмотреть тут — https://t.me/ALMCorpTrade/505. Некоторые ребята, как те, кто уже давно с нами, так и новички, получали это видео в личку или от бота. Цель — охватить им как можно больше людей. Зачем всё это? Дело в том, что …
❤4🔥4👨💻1🤝1
Маленький кусочек от одного из новых видео в новом блоке психологии😁 а вы с какой стороны?
❤6👍4🤪4😁3
Наконец-то смог выделить время для съемки блока психологии. Уже все подготовил, сегодня буду снимать первый урок из 12. Самому уже не терпится запустить его😋
🔥12❤5🎉1👍1🤝1
Всем доброго дня и хороших выходных🥰 Фандинг у нас снова вылез в район 50%. Может я не совсем внимательно смотрел, но нашел похожие значения лишь 7 апреля. Особенно сильные моменты те, когда такой фандинг держится сутки и больше.
❤5👍5🤝3
Читаю ваши анкеты. Такие все разные, но так похожи😌 Молодцы, что не стесняетесь и делитесь своими болями. Это уже важный шаг. Первым ребятам уже ответил. Искренне верю, что рекомендации вам помогут🫶🏻
👍5❤1❤🔥1
В этом видео я рассказал истории, которые знакомы каждому. Кто-то узнал себя в Ливерморе. Кто-то - в Ковнере. Большинство из нас - где-то посередине. Анкета под видео - это не тест. Это способ зафиксировать вашу текущую точку. Что вы пробовали? Что чувствуете? Где спотыкаетесь? Заполнив её, вы дадите мне материал для размышления. А я, в свою очередь, напишу вам то, что увидел в ваших ответах. Возможно, это один из …
❤7🔥4😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ALMCorpTrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Будет еще одна кочерга?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALMCorp TRADE” (@ALMCorpTrade), 189 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALMCorpTrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.