Engagement
4 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19650.0%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 786
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
4 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 13 August 2026 LITI RESTOK NOKOS LANGSUNG SAJA FOR SALE STOK NOKOS WHATSAPP NEGARA INDONESIA
PIN : ONLINE/AKTIF
SV : 1 HARI [ DI JAMIN AMAN KETIKA LOGIN GA KENON‼️ ]
COUNTRY/REGION : INDONESIA
NOMOR NEGARA NOKOS : +62
LIMIT CHAT : TIDAK [ NO MINUS ]
SISA STOK NOKOS : 1 NOKOS LAGI SAJA CUY GASKEN DI BELI
HARGA : RP. 6.000/6K NEGO TIPIS ATAU NET JUGA BOLEH 😭😂
ORDER NOKOS BISA LANGSUNG PV : @LitiFastAllActivities
AKUN ANDA LIMIT, TEN…
Signed 𝐋𝐢𝐭𝐢
2 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC798 viewsread 13 August 2026 OPEN PANEL BUAT RUN SCRIPT RP 3.000/3K SUDAH DAPET RAM UNLIMITED BTW PANEL GA DELAY BANGET, TEMA PANEL NEBULA, VPS D.O, DAN GARANSI 1 HARI SAJA YAA, ORDER PANEL BISA LANGSUNG CHAT : @LitiFastAllActivities
31 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC90 viewsread 13 August 2026 📦 𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗡 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗨𝗟𝗘 𝟵𝟬𝟬+ 📦
❖ 𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗚𝗔 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧
• 𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗨𝗠 𝟭 𝗕𝗨𝗟𝗔𝗡 : 𝗥𝗣 𝟭.𝟬𝟬𝟬/𝟭𝗞
• 𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗨𝗠 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗘𝗡𝗧 : 𝗥𝗣 𝟮.𝟬𝟬𝟬/𝟮𝗞
• 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗘𝗥 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗘𝗡𝗧 : 𝗥𝗣 𝟰.𝟬𝟬𝟬/𝟰𝗞
🌟𝗕𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗙𝗜𝗧 𝗕𝗨𝗬 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 🤖
–𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗬 𝗗𝗔𝗡 𝗟𝗔𝗚
–𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜 𝗚𝗔𝗞 𝗗𝗜 𝗨𝗥𝗨𝗦
–𝗖𝗢𝗖𝗢𝗞 𝗕𝗨𝗔𝗧 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗢𝗦𝗜
–𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗨𝗟𝗘 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗡𝗔𝗜𝗞 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗨𝗦
–𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗢𝗡 𝟮𝟰𝗝𝗔𝗠 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜 𝗢𝗙𝗙
–𝗕𝗜𝗦𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗨𝗔𝗧 𝗙𝗢𝗧𝗢 𝗝𝗔𝗗𝗜 𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗞
–𝗕𝗜𝗦𝗔 𝗞𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗢𝗥𝗚 𝗣𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗜 𝗚𝗕 𝗞𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗔𝗡
–𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗙𝗔𝗦𝗧 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡
–𝗞𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗦 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗨𝗠
–𝗗𝗟𝗟
𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗔𝗞𝗦𝗘𝗦 𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗧 𝗕𝗜𝗦𝗔
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ALLPRODUKBYLITI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 798,107 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liti Store” (@ALLPRODUKBYLITI), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALLPRODUKBYLITI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.