2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 12:04
186
+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:46
185
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.8%
avg views ÷ 186 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
17 (30 May 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
653
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
3m 09s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
88.5%
👍
10
11.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lets break up the borng a bit let me show you this encryption algorithm I wrote it when I was 13 oka maybe a kid!!! but I was smart.
and I managed to earn over $1,000 from it I very love it because I bought my first computer with the money I got from it before that I didn't have a computer😓
I have now removed the memory monitoring code and obfuscation and ban debugger and junk, and I am showing you the algorithm as …
Today, I'm teasing the release of NullGate WAF a high performance custom built Web Application Firewall engineered entirely in Go lang This isn't just another regex filter it’s a robust fail-closed security gateway designed to dismantle sophisticated attacks before they even touch the backend.
Advanced Bot Mitigation & TLS Fingerprinting: Strictly verifies genuine human interaction and utilizes TLS profiling to inst…
"بعد منتصف الليل ، تخرج الذئاب"
شارك فريقنا NightRaiders في مسابقة الامن السيبراني اللتي اقامتها وزارة الاتصالات وحصلنا على المركز ال#9 من اصل 400 فريق مشارك
❤️❤️❤️
طريقة الحصول على Api من كلاود كود opus 4.8 بقيمة 150$ بشكل مجاني
رابط الدعوة تحب تسجل بي او تسجل بشكل مباشر عل منصة براحتك❤️
https://agentrouter.org/register?aff=fUUl
هلفترة نازل ترند جديد يروح يجيب Api مال كلاود كود و GLM5.2 بشكل مجاني ويبيعة عل عالم ارخص من سعر الشركة
خوش تجارة الصراحة
هسة راح انزل الكم الطريقة بشكل مجاني❤️
بكل فخر أشارككم اليوم إتمامي بنجاح لمسار اختبار اختراق الويب (Web pentration tester) من أكاديمية HackTheBox
هذا الإنجاز يمثل محطة مهمة في مسيرتي الأكاديمية والمهنية في مجال الامن السيبراني ونقطة انطلاق أعمق نحو تحديات الBug Bounty واكتشاف الثغرات المتقدمة❤️❤️
اليوم حصدت ثمار التعب والسهر وانتهت مسيرتي بالنجاح بفضل الله ثم بالإصرار والعزيمة فرحتي اليوم لا توصف ولكنها لن تكتمل حقاً إلا برؤيتكم جميعاً في نفس هذا الموقف متوجين بالنجاح والتفوق أتمنى لكم من أعماق قلبي نجاحاً وتفوقاً يرفع الرأس عقبالكم جميعاً يا أبطال ولنواصل مسيرتنا نحو القمة!♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️🥰🥰🥳
تكدرون تاخذون حزمة المطورين مال GitHub و خصم HackTheBox بكل سهولة عن طريق الهوية الجامعية مال Hepiq بدون ايميل جامعي
بس شرط لازم اسمك بحساب GitHub نفس اسمك بالهوية
حل التحدي :
أول ما تفتح الموقع راح يحمل ملف اسمه chaos.wasm هذا الملف مو فيكة هو قلب التحدي
أني استخدمت تقنية اسمها WebAssembly (WASM) برمجت ملف WASM بلغة Go يشتغل مباشرة داخل المتصفح
شنو يسوي هذا الملف؟
اول ما تضغط Login الWASM يتدخل:
يأخذ مدخلاتك (username + password)
يسوي توقيع رقم معتمد على خوارزمية معينة
salt = (timestamp XOR 0xDEADBEEF) << 2
payload = "USR:{user}|PWD:{pass}|T:{timestamp}|N:{nonce}|S:{salt}"
si…
تحدي CTF من تصميمي
عنوان التحدي: حارس الوقت
قصة التحدي :
بعد تعرض منظمة سرية لاختراق كارثي بسبب ثغرات بسيطة قررت الإدارة طرد كل فريق الامن السيبراني وتعيين مهندس أمن سيبراني غريب الأطوار مصاب بجنون العظمة يُعرف باسم دكتور كرونوس (Dr. Chronos)
دكتور كرونوس عنده عقدة نفسية وكراهية شديدة لـ أطفال السكربتات (Script Kiddies) والهاكرز اللي يعتمدون على الأدوات الجاهزة مثل Burp Suite أو SQLmap هو يؤمن إن الهاكر الحقيقي هو ال…
❤6
Signed ALi AL-Qaisi
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ALIAL_QAISI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,362,285 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abo 3Leo” (@ALIAL_QAISI), 186 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALIAL_QAISI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.