Channel
@ALASTOR_HARTFELT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
177subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002053558020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ALASTOR_HARTFELT |
| Description | привязано к сетевой: @Avenue_333 ПОЧТА: @R1IH_BOT |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ALASTOR_HARTFELT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 177 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
214 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 37.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 21.5% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 15.9% | |
| 🍓 | 28 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 5.61% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 2.80% | |
| 😴 | 6 | 2.80% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.935% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Читаю ваши новые и новые письма, создаётся впечатление, что все ВДРУГ (!!) научились общаться как подобает. Там и здравствуйте, и с уважением... наелись вежливых пилюль, ИЛИ ЗА БЫЛОЕ НЕВЕЖЕСТВО ЗАДАЛИ ПО ЗАСЛУГАМ? 😀😀 Нагло интересуюсь. НАСТАИВАЮ НА ОТВЕТЕ.🤩 Конечно, так письма будут проверяться чаще. Continuez votre bon travail. 🤔 t. recording continues..
❤15❤🔥3
Quel délice...
🍓6
Здравствуйте, уважаемый Аластор!!! Я просто не могла пройти мимо вашего выхода из реста и решила написать. Мне нужен ваш совет... Рассказываю. На днях купила проигрыватель. Задумалась, что поставить. Решила что-то из джаза. Не подскажете что? Интересно ваше мнение. С уважением, Лирокка Фокс. Mon cher... Дорогая Лирокка Фокс, какой же вы тонкий ценитель, раз решили начать с этого! Позвольте этому демону показа…
❤🔥13❤6💯4
Рози! Как ЧУДНО, что именно сейчас ты задала этот вопрос. Je te le jure🤩 Я бы подумал о чем-то хорошем (хорошем??) Как сейчас было бы замечательно пригубить крепкого виски . . Уют, пожалуй, это тихий домик в гремучих лесах, где ты сам себе хозяин и делаешь что душе угодно. Пока она у тебя есть.🤩 🤔 t. recording continues..
❤12❤🔥4💯4🍓1
“ Я вот думаю, может я бы вернулась к жизни, или скоро вернусь к жизни, а то после смерти в аду места не нахожу, в рай не могу, грешила, и что дальше делать? Ох-х... мне, пожалуй, налейте то же, что и этой даме! 🤔 t. recording continues..
❤🔥13❤4🔥3
“ как отдохнули? М-м, сказать вам прямо, или . . . Je pense que c'est la deuxième option ;) Отдых, в моём понимании, такое РАЗМЫТОЕ понятие, ведь кого-то этот(какой? Réveille-toi, chérie!) подход до смерти утомляет. Представьте себе. Иногда лучше просто наблюдать за тем, как мир вокруг продолжает вращаться, не вмешиваясь в его дела. Все носятся, как грязные таракашки, УБИВАЮТСЯ из-за пустяков, а ты пьёшь свой …
🍓11❤6😴6❤🔥3💯1
И ведь НИ РАЗУ не солгал! Разве что немного ЗАДЕРЖАЛ своё личное появление. Но разве это не делало ожидание более приятным? 🤩 Я ЗНАЮ-ЗНАЮ. На горизонте у нас . . пустой почтовый ящик, и совершенно сонные смертные лица? Так дело не пойдет, вам нужно взбодриться. Предлагаю вам скрасить это утро парой ЖУТКИХ вопросов, чтобы ваш радиоведущий не расслаблялся?🤩 @R1IH_BOT 🤔 t. recording continues
❤10🍓4🔥3
🤍🤍🤍🤍✦🤍🤍🤍🤍 333 АВЕНЮ ВЫХОДИТ ИЗ РЕСТА! ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Привет? 🥺🥺🥺 СПИСОК ПЕРСОНАЖЕЙ 🌟🌟🌟 . . #рест
🔥4🍓2💯2
Поймал волну, дамы и господа! ЧТО-ТО мне подсказывает, что уже через . . Хм-м, пару недель (так скоро!🌟) мы с вами вновь услышимся на этой волне. Разве это не звучит как ПОВОД очнуться и начать готовиться к нашей встрече полным ходом? Не слышу радостных возгласов, mes chers amis!🌟 🤔 t. recording continues..
❤11🍓3💯2
Мы просто ОБЯЗАНЫ повторить это в следующем году, не так ли?🤩🤩 Поделиться впечатлениями и рассказать о параде вы можете в нашей собственной газете! ( @m333il_bot ) Я обязательно замечу ваш отзыв🫡 🤔 t. recording continues..
💯10❤🔥2🔥2🍓1💘1
🤩ВЁЗДЫ НАШЕГО КАРНАВАЛА : КИРА, она же КОРОЛЕВА ДЖАЗА “ С таким жаром до самого конца! Полагаю, теперь я знаю, у кого спросить, где искать вдохновение. 👍 ОПИУМ, он же КАРМАННЫЙ ГРЕШНИК “ Что за соблазнитель, однажды продаст мне мою же трость, клянусь вам!😨 РОЗИ, она же КОМЕДИАНТ С ПОЖИЗНЕННЫМ “ Такого порядка выдачи неожиданных идей я не видел со времён чумы (шучу-шучу). . . хм-м 😊 АНГЕЛОЧЕК, она же УГАДАЙ ЧТО ВЫДАМ…
💯9❤4❤🔥2💘2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ALASTOR_HARTFELT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А ТЕПЕРЬ ВЫБИРАЕМ " Самый нелепый способ умереть в Марди Гра — это... "
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 710,978 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤ𝕽AD|O #1 𝗜𝗡 𝗛E𝗟𝗟” (@ALASTOR_HARTFELT), 177 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALASTOR_HARTFELT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.