3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 771–778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:52
772
-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:48
777
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:38
777
first reading
Engagement
2 posts held, back to 28 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2024 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎓 밈코인 대학교에 오신 걸 환영합니다
웃음으로 시작해, 흐름으로 읽고, 데이터로 판단하는
밈코인의 현재와 미래를 공부하는 공간입니다.
📌 밈코인 대학교에서는 이런 걸 다룹니다
지금 시장에서 주목받는 밈코인 시황 정리
갑자기 불타오르는 핫한 친구들(신규·재조명 코인)
트위터(X), 텔레그램, 커뮤니티에서 감지되는 온체인·심리 흐름
“왜 오르는지 / 왜 식는지”에 대한 맥락 중심 분석
🚀 밈코인은 운이 아니라 타이밍과 흐름의 게임입니다.
소문보다 빠르게, 감정보다 차분하게,
한 박자 앞서 시장을 읽는 연습을 함께합니다.
📚 우리는 누가 얼마 벌었다는 자랑보다
왜 지금 이 밈이 살아있는지를 더 중요하게 봅니다.
가볍게 웃고,
깊게 보고,
스스로 판단할 수 있게.
밈은 장난처럼 시작하지만, 흐름은 절대 장난이 아닙니다.
대나무숲…
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @AJE_DeGen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Baby Doge 공지사항 @BabyDogeAnnKO · 88,603 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“아재는 디젠 공지방(DEX Alpha Trade)” (@AJE_DeGen), 772 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AJE_DeGen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
