Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

irbots AI | ChatGPT

@AI_irbots

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

95,513subscribers

-763 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944573781
TypeChannel
Username@AI_irbots
Created11 March 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AI_irbots

Growth

95,51396,27695,894.56 August 2026 — 96,276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 96,141 subscribers8 August 2026 — 96,019 subscribers8 August 2026 — 95,976 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95,793 subscribers11 August 2026 — 95,728 subscribers11 August 2026 — 95,673 subscribers12 August 2026 — 95,513 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -763. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,399–96,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5695,513-160
11 Aug 2026, 23:5295,673-55
11 Aug 2026, 02:3295,728-65
9 Aug 2026, 23:3295,793-183
8 Aug 2026, 23:5195,976-43
8 Aug 2026, 00:2396,019-122
6 Aug 2026, 22:2696,141-135
6 Aug 2026, 06:0696,276first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 March 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 95,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held16 (11 March 202312 August 2026)
Views total65,710
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,750 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,50758.2%
1,65421.3%
👎7139.20%
🤔4766.14%
🔥3244.18%
😁760.981%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,750reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2023 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AI_irbots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 March 2023 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,930 views19 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

احتمال افزایش قیمت اشتراک Gemini Pro تا 2 برابر ! قبل از افزایش قیمت اقدام به خرید کنید فقط 585 هزار تومان ! 👇 https://t.me/SquirrelAccount_bot?start=p_364

👎103🔥3🤔2👍1

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈29,600 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 اشتراک Gemini Pro با فعال‌سازی سریع روی اکانت شخصی شما (توسط شما) ✅ اشتراک رسمی ۱۸ ماهه ⚡️ فعال‌سازی کمتر از 1 دقیقه 🛡 همراه با ضمانت و پشتیبانی 💲 قیمت فقط 585 هزار تومان خرید: @SquirrelAccount_bot

12👍6🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈7,740 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏خروج از پوشه Saved با کمک هوش مصنوعی ‏یک استارتاپ تازه با کمک هوش مصنوعی می‌خواهد مشکل آشنای خیلی‌ها را حل کند: جاهایی که در اینستاگرام یا تیک‌تاک ذخیره می‌کنیم، اما هیچ‌وقت سراغشان نمی‌رویم. اپلیکیشن Outernet پست‌ها، لینک‌ها، اسکرین‌شات‌ها و مکان‌های ذخیره‌شده را تحلیل می‌کند، اطلاعات مهمشان را بیرون می‌کشد و از دلشان برنامه‌های واقعی سفر و ماجراجویی می‌سازد. ایده‌اش ساده است؛ به‌جای اینکه چیزهای ذخیره‌شده فقط ت

14👍1

29 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈9,590 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏Pangram به‌جای ساخت مدل، سراغ تشخیص متن‌های هوش مصنوعی رفت ‏این روزها اینترنت پر شده از محتواهایی که با هوش مصنوعی ساخته می‌شوند؛ از مقاله و خبر گرفته تا پست‌های شبکه‌های اجتماعی. توی همین فضا، استارتاپ Pangram تصمیم گرفته به‌جای رقابت مستقیم با موج مدل‌ها، ابزار تشخیص خودش را جلو ببرد. این شرکت حالا ۹ میلیون دلار سرمایه جذب کرده تا فناوری تشخیص متن‌های تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی را توسعه بدهد. هدفش هم این است که این

11👍4

28 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈8,060 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏پاسخ‌های هوش مصنوعی گوگل حالا بخش بزرگی از جستجو را گرفته‌اند ‏گزارش تازه Similarweb می‌گوید پاسخ‌های هوش مصنوعی گوگل حالا به ۴۳ درصد رسیده‌اند و همین موضوع دارد شکل جستجو را عوض می‌کند. یعنی گوگل کم‌کم از یک درگاه برای رفتن به وب، به جایی تبدیل می‌شود که خیلی از کاربرها همان‌جا جوابشان را می‌گیرند. این تغییر برای سرویس جستجوی گوگل مهم است، چون رفتار کاربر را مستقیم تحت‌تأثیر می‌گذارد. وقتی پاسخ داخل خود نتایج آما

👍94👎3

27 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC≈8,790 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏آیا امواج مغزی کلید بعدی هوش مصنوعی فیزیکی هستند؟ ‏دیگر فقط ویدیوهای یوتیوب برای آموزش مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی فیزیکی کافی نیست. این متن از یک مسیر تازه می‌گوید: این مدل‌های مرزی برای بهتر شدن، به چند زاویه دوربین، برچسب‌گذاری دقیق و حتی در آینده به خوانش امواج مغزی هم نیاز دارند. ایده اصلی این است که هرچه داده‌ها دقیق‌تر و غنی‌تر باشند، مدل بهتر می‌تواند حرکت و رفتار را در دنیای واقعی بفهمد. فقط یک نما از صحنه، آن‌قدر

13👍2👎2🤔2🔥1

6 May 2026, 14:00 UTC≈31,700 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

برخی از محدودیت های ربات با توجه به شرایط ناپایدار اینترنت در ایران کاهش یافت . 🤖@gptchat_irbot ✈️@ai_irbots

16🤔5🔥4👎1

9 Dec 2024, 05:26 UTC≈269,000 views221 reactionsread 12 August 2026

این هوش مصنوعی به شما در شناسایی پروژه های کلاه برداری کمک میکنه ، در صورتی که به شما پیشنهاد سرمایه گذاری یا کسب درآمد شد فقط کافیه به این سایت مراجعه کنید و آدرس سایت مربوط به اون پروژه رو وارد کنید و Search رو بزنید تا بهتون نشون بده که چقدر احتمال داره اون پروژه کلاه برداری باشه ادرس سایت 👇👇 https://scamminder.com توضیحات بیشتر سازنده: https://t.me/webamoozir/18063 https://t.me/webamoozir/18064 به زودی این امک

👍12860🔥18🤔9👎6

9 Jul 2024, 08:44 UTC≈401,000 views363 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#تولید_عکس #اپدیت 🔥با تهیه اشتراک ویژه ربات، شما می‌توانید به راحتی با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی (DALL-E 3) عکس تولید کنید. همچنین امکان ارتباط با ChatGPT-3.5 نیز به صورت رایگان برای همه کاربران فعال است. ✅ برای تهیه اشتراک ویژه دستور /vip را در ربات ارسال کنید 🤖@gptchat_irbot ✈️@ai_irbots ™️ @irbots | irbots.com

👍20856👎51🤔25🔥23

30 Jun 2024, 06:34 UTC≈405,000 views231 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#آپدیت ربات @GPTchat_irbot به‌روزرسانی شده و ویژگی‌های جدیدی به آن اضافه شده است: ✅ قابلیت استفاده از مدل‌های GPT-4 و GPT-4o ✅ ایجاد تصاویر با استفاده از DAL-E 3 ✅ امکان ارسال ویس یا تصویر به ربات برای تعامل راحت تر برای استفاده از این ویژگی‌ها، از دستورات زیر استفاده کنید: /gpt4 /gpt4o /pic #Update ✅ Ability to use GPT-4 and GPT-4o models ✅ Creating images using DAL-E 3 ✅The ability to send voice messages or image

👍12934👎28🤔21🔥19

16 Oct 2023, 18:24 UTC≈877,000 views3,052 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

درصورتی که ربات با زبان دیگری به شما پاسخ داد، برای برگشت به حالت اولیه و شروع مجدد چت، می‌توانید دستور "/start" را برای ربات ارسال کنید. این دستور باعث می‌شود ربات چت قبلی شما را فراموش کرده و دوباره اقدام به پاسخ‌دهی کند. همچنین، برای درک بهتر ربات از درخواست شما سعی کنید که توضیحات بیشتری ارائه کنید، ربات دقیقا می‌تواند زبان مورد استفاده شما را تشخیص دهد و به درستی درک کند. 🫥 if the bot responded to your message

👍1,980487👎293🤔183🔥109

5 Oct 2023, 15:20 UTC≈758,000 views1,949 reactionsread 12 August 2026

کار ربات chatGPT چیه ؟ ربات @GPTchat_irbot به شما امکان مکالمه با یک نسخه از مدل GPT از شرکت OpenAI را می‌دهد.، شما میتوانید از این چت بات در مورد تقریبا هر موضوعی سوال بپرسید و او به شما پاسخ میدهد البته ممکن است پاسخ های ربات کاملا صحیح نباشد. این ربات رایگان است ؟ در حال حاضر، این ربات کاملاً رایگان و نامحدود است. اما در آینده ممکن است تغییرات و محدودیت‌هایی اعمال شود، زیرا نگهداری این ربات هزینه‌بر است. چرا بعض

👍1,330309👎140🤔86🔥84

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AI_irbots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@AI_irbots edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,878 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“irbots AI | ChatGPT” (@AI_irbots), 95,513 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AI_irbots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.