Channel
@AIReviewStudies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
457subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003165148274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIReviewStudies |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 17 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIReviewStudies |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 457 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 456 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 456 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
194 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 41.8% | |
| 🙏 | 58 | 29.9% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 7.73% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.515% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پرامپت پیشنهادی برای تعیین ضرورت انجام مطالعه مروری: I, as a researcher in [insert your research area], am going to design a protocol for a systematic review with the research question below. Play the role of an expert in conducting review studies. Research Question: [insert your review question] I am worry about the novelty of the proposed study. I do not know is there any existing published review study exactly…
❤8🙏7
چگونه شکاف پژوهشی (Research Gap) را شناسایی کنیم؟ شناسایی شکاف پژوهشی، یکی از مهمترین و در عین حال چالشبرانگیزترین مراحل طراحی یک مطالعه علمی—بهویژه مطالعات مروری—است. بدون شناسایی درست این شکاف، احتمال تکراری شدن پژوهش بسیار بالا خواهد بود. در ادامه، چند راهکار کاربردی برای یافتن شکاف پژوهشی معرفی میشود: 🔹 جستجوی مقدماتی در پایگاههای علمی پیش از هر چیز، یک جستجوی اولیه در پایگاههای معتبر مانند PubMed، Scopu…
👍3❤2
اولین سؤال در یک مطالعه مروری: آیا واقعاً انجام آن لازم است؟ قبل از شروع هر نوع مطالعه مروری، اولین و مهمترین گام پاسخ به این پرسش اساسی است: آیا انجام یک مطالعه مروری جدید ضروری است؟ یک مرور علمی زمانی ارزشمند است که دانش موجود را یک گام به جلو ببرد و صرفاً تکرار مطالعات قبلی نباشد. بنابراین، پیش از آغاز کار باید اطمینان حاصل شود که این مطالعه ارزش افزوده علمی ایجاد میکند. 🔹 درک شکاف پژوهشی (Research Gap) شکاف …
👍2❤1👏1
باسلام، یلداتون مبارک. در کنار خانواده سلامت و شاد باشید. 🍉🍉🍉🍉🍉
🙏12👍2💔1
انواع مطالعات مروری: در این رفرنس انواع مطالعات مروری معرفی و توضیح داده شده است. #انواع_مطالعات_مروری https://t.me/AIReviewStudies
👍4
📊 انتخاب نوع مطالعه مروری بر اساس هدف سؤال پژوهشی یکی از گامهای کلیدی در طراحی یک مطالعه مروری، همراستا کردن هدف پژوهش با نوع مناسب مطالعه مروری است. در این پست نشان میدهیم که هر هدف پژوهشی، با چه نوع سؤالی و چه نوع مطالعه مروری تناسب بیشتری دارد: 🔹 سنجش اثر یک مداخله اگر هدف شما بررسی اثر یک مداخله (مثلاً تأثیر یک اپلیکیشن سلامت دیجیتال بر یک پیامد مانند HbA1c) است، مرور نظاممند یا متاآنالیز مناسبترین انتخاب…
❤3
چگونه با کمک هوش مصنوعی یک سئوال پژوهشی خوب برای مطالعه مروری خود تدوین کنیم؟ یکی از مناسبترین راهها برای تدوین یک سؤال پژوهشی قوی در مطالعات مروری، استفاده از ابزار هوش مصنوعی Elicit.com است. 🔹 این ابزار به پژوهشگران کمک میکند تا سؤال تحقیق خود را از نظر شفافیت، تمرکز، و قابلیت پاسخگویی بهصورت نظاممند بررسی کنند. 🔹 این ابزار میتواند سؤال پژوهشی شما را تحلیل کرده و پیشنهادهایی برای بهبود ساختار، دامنه، و دقت…
👏5❤2
پرامپت پیشنهادی برای تشکیل تیم مطالعه مروری: For the second step of conducting my review study—aimed at achieving the following objective: [insert your review objective]—I need to assemble a research team with the necessary expertise. Please provide guidance on the essential team members and outline their roles and responsibilities. #Prompt #Research_team #Review_team #پرامپت https://t.me/AIReviewStudies
❤7👍4
🔎 تشکیل تیم مناسب برای انجام یک مطالعه مروری برای اجرای یک مطالعه مروری، داشتن یک تیم چندتخصصی نقش تعیینکنندهای در دقت، شفافیت و کارایی دارد. در ادامه، نقشهای اصلی و مسئولیتهای هر یک معرفی شده است: • پژوهشگر اصلی (PI) / سرپرست تیم نظارت بر کل فرایند مطالعه مروری تعریف سؤال پژوهشی و محدوده مطالعه تصمیمگیریهای کلیدی، هماهنگی اعضای تیم، و تضمین کیفیت و زمانبندی • متخصص موضوعی (Subject-Matter Expert) یا حوزه …
👍4❤2
در مسیر قدرتمندتر شدن، تغییرات کوچک اما عمیق میتوانند تفاوتهای بزرگی ایجاد کنند. هر کدام از نکات زیر، یک گام عملی برای ساختن شخصیتی اثرگذار، آرام و در عین حال مقتدر است. اگر بهدنبال رشد فردی و حرفهای هستید، این اصول میتوانند سکوی شروع شما باشند: چگونه قدرتمندتر شویم؟ ۱. آرام بمانید؛ آرامش، امضای افراد قوی است. ۲. کمتر حرف بزنید؛ عمق شخصیت از سکوتهای سنجیده شکل میگیرد. ۳. بیشتر مشاهده کنید؛ قدرت در دیدن جزئیا…
❤12👍6👏4
معرفی نرم افزار مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی ASReview جهت Screening مقالات در مطالعات مروری https://t.me/AIReviewStudies
❤10👏3
https://t.me/AIReviewStudies
🙏32❤2🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AIReviewStudies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 294,192 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی در مطالعات مروری” (@AIReviewStudies), 457 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIReviewStudies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.