Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐴(𝐼)𝑀 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑦

@AIM_LABEL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

105subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153650538
TypeChannel
Username@AIM_LABEL
DescriptionДочерняя компания @gk_labels
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AIM_LABEL

Growth

1057 August 2026 — 105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 09:02105no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:36105first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
3
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
2m 31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53778349247766271891218.8%
custom 53795668531588706491117.2%
custom 53773094741826686261015.6%
💔1015.6%
57.81%
❤‍🔥46.25%
🆒46.25%
🎉23.13%
🕊23.13%
😍23.13%
🔥11.56%
😘11.56%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2025 to 9 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2025, 15:43 UTCviews —

𝐴(𝐼)𝑀 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑦 pinned «Aim company, являясь дочерней компанией gk label, также переходит в статус заморозки. Надеемся на ваше понимание 🙏 #gklabel #aimcompany»

9 Apr 2025, 15:43 UTC215 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Aim company, являясь дочерней компанией gk label, также переходит в статус заморозки. Надеемся на ваше понимание 🙏 #gklabel #aimcompany

💔8🎉1🔥1😍1😘1

9 Apr 2025, 15:42 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gk_labelsPhoto

Дорогие друзья! К сожалению, как вы могли заметить, на данный момент у нас нет возможности продолжать активную деятельность компании. Но мы не можем позволить себе расстаться с двумя годами существования G&K label и так легко закрыться. Поэтому было принято решение, что компания переходит в статус "заморозки". Все внутренние и внешние процессы будут приостановлены на неопределенный срок. Возможно в будущем компания б

❤‍🔥2💔2🎉1😍1

18 Mar 2025, 12:33 UTC260 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Наша компания попала в краш лист🤩

❤‍🔥2

18 Mar 2025, 12:32 UTC208 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mniselestiaPhoto

≡ NEWI NEW ≡ CRACH LIST ≡ 〔КРАШ ЛИСТ〕 『 Умри сегодня, но не сейчас. Кровавая Мэри смотрит на вас. 』 「≡ « СОЛО » ≡ 」 ➜ Kim Leren ➜ Sumin ➜ Kaneko ➜ MoonSoa ➜ Igarashi Maya ➜ KHAN YONGHEE ➜ Виви на пути в Китай ➜ VANNY ➜ Valeri ➜ Rina ───────────────── ፧፧፧ Компании ፧፧፧ ╰▸ MRG ENT ╰▸ DREAM ENT ╰▸ GB ENT ╰▸ ICE ENT ╰▸ A(I)M COMPANY ╰▸ JOA ENT ࿐Журналисты: ♯݊ LUNA ♯݊ ROUVI ♯݊ LU

2

10 Mar 2025, 07:28 UTC175 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У компании появился пиар чат🤩 https://t.me/piarchat_aim

custom 53778349247766271892🆒1custom 53773094741826686261custom 53795668531588706491

8 Mar 2025, 13:06 UTC215 viewsread 9 August 2026

🤩Нас упомянули в последних новостях ои. А вы уже видели подборку?

8 Mar 2025, 13:04 UTC191 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mniselestiaVideo

≡ NEWI NEW ≡ ARTICLE ≡ 〔СТАТЬЯ〕 『 Умри сегодня, но не сейчас. Кровавая Мэри смотрит на вас. 』 ───────────────── ╰▸ ПОСЛЕДНИЕ НОВОСТИ ОИ ࿐Вырезки видео: ~ 0:13 уход Наби ~ 1:27 Набор на участницу Stellar ~ 1:31 спойлер к практике ~ 1:34 Рина подала заявку в Stellar ~ 1:44 Что же происходит с Jou? ~ 1:54 Поздравляем Lk! ~ 1:57 IVA! ~ 2:03 пропала с радаров ~ 2:10 Селина ~ 2:13 Биатрис ~ 2:18 подборка AI

custom 53773094741826686261custom 53778349247766271891custom 53795668531588706491

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AIM_LABEL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐴(𝐼)𝑀 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑦” (@AIM_LABEL), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIM_LABEL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.