Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI HOUSE

Channel

AI HOUSE

@AIHOUSE

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,312subscribers

+611 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001493569200
TypeChannel
Username@AIHOUSE
DescriptionНайбільше AI-комʼюніті в Україні. Тут актуальні ML/AI-новини, інсайти практиків, анонси івентів та корисні добірки. Наш live-чат: https://t.me/aihousechat 👉 Колаборація: [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AIHOUSE

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7007,3127,0066 August 2026 — 6,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,700 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,708 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,717 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,737 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,738 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,741 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,759 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,766 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,783 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,792 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,828 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,848 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,903 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,935 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,020 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,108 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,154 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,179 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,190 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,196 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,219 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,234 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,277 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,295 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,312 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,608–7,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:167,312+17
7 Nov 2026, 10:387,295+18
4 Nov 2026, 20:117,277+43
2 Nov 2026, 01:317,234+15
30 Oct 2026, 00:067,219+23
27 Oct 2026, 07:377,196+6
24 Oct 2026, 04:277,190+11
21 Oct 2026, 05:377,179+25
18 Oct 2026, 00:467,154+46
15 Oct 2026, 10:007,108+88
12 Oct 2026, 11:007,020+85
5 Oct 2026, 11:396,935+32
27 Sept 2026, 03:006,903+55
17 Sept 2026, 18:416,848+20
13 Sept 2026, 22:586,828+36
10 Sept 2026, 08:166,792+9
4 Sept 2026, 16:186,783+17
1 Sept 2026, 09:086,766+7
29 Aug 2026, 05:346,759+18
25 Aug 2026, 23:426,741first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 7,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held43 (18 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total53,049
Reactions total547
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈147
Links
≈1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,011 reactions across 42 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤34734.3%
🔥27327.0%
👍16816.6%
😁616.03%
custom 5314484470693244062333.26%
🤣252.47%
⚡232.27%
🤔191.88%
🤪161.58%
😱131.29%
💘50.495%
🥴50.495%
👏40.396%
❤‍🔥30.297%
💅30.297%
👨‍💻20.198%
💯20.198%
🤨20.198%
🥱20.198%
✍10.099%
4 further kinds40.396%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,011 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC879 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У кожного свої робочі виклики 😁 🏠 LinkedIn 🏠 Instagram 🏠 Podcast

😁10💯2👍1

11 Nov 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,080 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Gemini 4 Carbon відновила гру, яку Деміс Хассабіс створив у 90-х Модель провела реверс-інжиніринг оригінальних бінарних файлів Theme Park — гри-симулятора парку розваг. Gemini 4 Carbon відтворила гру, додала новий атракціон у стилі DeepMind і перенесла все у веб — за один запит. Рік тому Хассабіс уже відтворював тестову версію Theme Park за допомогою Gemini 3. Тоді на це пішло кілька годин, а тепер Gemini 4 Carbon …

🔥10👍4❤2

10 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,350 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Meta випустила Muse Ember 👀 Модель оптимізована для типових агентних завдань: викликів інструментів, програмування, пошуку та обробки інформації. Вона має контекстне вікно на 1 млн токенів і підтримує текст, зображення, аудіо та відео. Muse Ember показує результати на рівні Claude Haiku 5.5 у загальному індексі Artificial Analysis, але коштує дешевше. Вартість — $0,10 за мільйон вхідних і $0,50 за мільйон вихідних …

❤9👍5🔥1🥱1

10 Nov 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,580 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Anthropic представила Claude Fable 5.2 🔥 Нова версія генерує відповіді до 30% швидше та коштує дешевше за попередню. Fable 5.2 покращила результати в програмуванні, міркуванні, робототехніці та наукових дослідженнях. В одному з експериментів модель координувала понад 1000 AI-агентів, які за вісім днів створили операційну систему з нуля, здатну запускатися на ноутбуці. Ще один приклад — формалізація доведення остан…

❤14🔥9👍6

9 Nov 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,570 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍12🔥5❤2custom 53144844706932440621

4 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,290 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

DeepSeek представила прототип автономного AI-агента для програмування Команда DeepSeek Harness опублікувала dsh-superagent — дослідницький прототип AI-агента, який працює з одним GitHub-репозиторієм і може отримувати запити через GitHub та Feishu. Коли авторизований учасник команди ставить завдання, агент створює окрему робочу сесію, виконує його та повертає результат у початкову розмову — наприклад, у вигляді pull…

❤6👍4custom 53144844706932440623🤨2

3 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,290 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

OpenAI об’єднає вкладки Chat і Work у ChatGPT З оновленим інтерфейсом користувачі зможуть переходити від обговорення ідеї до її реалізації без перемикання між вкладками. Тоді ChatGPT зможе не лише відповідати на запити, а й виконувати складніші завдання за допомогою підключених застосунків та файлів. Користувачі зможуть стежити за роботою асистента та коригувати її. Codex залишиться окремим розділом у десктопному з…

👍13❤2custom 53144844706932440621

3 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,210 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ілон Маск визнав, що обслуговування Grok Bot обходиться компанії надто дорого Користувачі почали скаржитися, що їхні тижневі ліміти використання AI-агента закінчуються значно швидше, ніж зазвичай. Маск пояснив, що витрати на роботу Grok Bot поки не відповідають доходам від нього. Водночас компанія не уточнила, чи змінилися ліміти підписників на постійній основі. 🏠 LinkedIn 🏠 Instagram 🏠 Podcast

😁10🤔8👍3❤2custom 53144844706932440621

2 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC≈2,070 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤15🔥5⚡2custom 53144844706932440621

30 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 11 November 2026
Poll

У якому місті ви живете?

  1. Київ54%
  2. Львів28%
  3. Харків6%
  4. Дніпро4%
  5. Одеса4%
  6. Ужгород3%
  7. Тернопіль3%
  8. Івано-Франківськ6%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,300 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Хочемо частіше зустрічатися з вами наживо 👥 Тому зараз плануємо майбутні події і хочемо зрозуміти, у яких містах живе наша спільнота. Це допоможе нам обирати локації для зустрічей. Голосуйте в опитуванні та допоможіть нам спланувати події 👇 Якщо не знайшли своє місто — пишіть його у коментарях. 🏠 LinkedIn 🏠 Instagram 🏠 Podcast

❤9👍2💘2custom 53144844706932440621

29 Oct 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,270 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍12🔥7⚡2❤2🐳1custom 53144844706932440621

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @AIHOUSE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTCFinal Results456 voters

У якому місті ви живете?

  1. Київ54%
  2. Львів28%
  3. Харків6%
  4. Дніпро4%
  5. Одеса4%
  6. Ужгород3%
  7. Тернопіль3%
  8. Івано-Франківськ6%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Genesis Academy
@Genesis_Academy · 20,087
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
ChatGPT | Штучний нейрон
@chatgptua · 37,214
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Ооо нейромережеве🐱
@oooneuro · 26,826
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
DOU
@doucommunity · 42,400
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Артем Бородатюк
@artemborodatiuk · 27,119
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI HOUSE” (@AIHOUSE), 7,312 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIHOUSE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.