پادکست شاد میخوای !؟ اینو پلی کن : 💃🎶 @AhanGawmeh
❤69💔10🍾5👍5🤯4🔥2

Channel
@AHANGAWMEH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,481,693subscribers
+14,571 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001499250939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AHANGAWMEH |
| Description | - ﷽🧿'' •[𝐰𝐥𝐜 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥📀🎧]• دو دیقه موزیک گوش دادن حق شماست :)🤍🎧 ✨ تبلیغات پر بازده [ @AD_SY_TAB ] •• 🎧🖤📀🔐•• |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AHANGAWMEH |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 1,481,693 | +2,767 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 1,478,926 | +2,390 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:40 | 1,476,536 | +2,963 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 1,473,573 | +2,137 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 1,471,436 | +3,712 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 1,467,724 | +602 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 1,467,122 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 1,467,122 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,398,600 |
| Reactions total | 4,725 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 26 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 24of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 13 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 15.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 45.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 37,550 views — 2.53% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 41,390).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2532912 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC | 2021 minutes – 16 hours old | 32,800 views ~95 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,738 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,700 → 6.0 hours: 17,400 → 12 hours: 27,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 5.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2532712 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC | 2025 minutes – 16 hours old | 33,000 views ~46 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,100 → 3.0 hours: 11,200 → 6.0 hours: 17,800 → 12 hours: 28,100still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 5.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2532511 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC | 3415 minutes – 27 hours old | 37,800 views ~73 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,500 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,700 → 6.0 hours: 14,000 → 12 hours: 21,000 → 24 hours: 35,500still climbing at last reading | 35,500measured | 11 hours |
| /2532611 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC | 3415 minutes – 27 hours old | 44,800 views ~121 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,547 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,900 → 6.0 hours: 14,200 → 12 hours: 21,700 → 24 hours: 40,900still climbing at last reading | 40,900measured | 12 hours |
| /2532311 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC | 3415 minutes – 27 hours old | 35,100 views ~69 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,566 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,700 → 6.0 hours: 14,000 → 12 hours: 20,600 → 24 hours: 33,200still climbing at last reading | 33,200measured | 10 hours |
| /2532211 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC | 4319 minutes – 34 hours old | 40,500 views ~137 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,030 → 3.0 hours: 10,600 → 6.0 hours: 16,600 → 12 hours: 25,900 → 24 hours: 35,000still climbing at last reading | 35,000measured | 7.0 hours |
| /2532011 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC | 4321 minutes – 34 hours old | 37,600 views ~51 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,400 → 3.0 hours: 10,900 → 6.0 hours: 16,900 → 12 hours: 24,500 → 24 hours: 32,500still climbing at last reading | 32,500measured | 6.6 hours |
| /2531910 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC | 5937 minutes – 2 days old | 53,500 views ~136 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,999 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,900 → 6.0 hours: 13,000 → 12 hours: 20,300 → 24 hours: 40,100 → 2 days: 52,500still climbing at last reading | 40,100measured | 17 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
4,725 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,293 | 69.7% | |
| 💔 | 356 | 7.53% | |
| 👍 | 200 | 4.23% | |
| 🍾 | 197 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 191 | 4.04% | |
| 💊 | 188 | 3.98% | |
| ❤🔥 | 158 | 3.34% | |
| 🤯 | 91 | 1.93% | |
| 😍 | 31 | 0.656% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 0.423% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,725reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پادکست شاد میخوای !؟ اینو پلی کن : 💃🎶 @AhanGawmeh
❤69💔10🍾5👍5🤯4🔥2
𝕎𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕗𝕒𝕚𝕝 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕖 برنده ها شکست میخورن و بلند میشن.
❤33🔥7❤🔥3💊3
…
❤50🤯9❤🔥6💔5👍3
یه اهنگ فوق العاده زیبا به شدت پیشنهاد میشه قفلی همه تون همونی که زیادی ترند شده این روزا 🫀🥂♥️ @AHANGAWMEH
❤89💔11🍾7🤯5❤🔥4💊4🔥1
타인의 고통을 이해하는 마음은 아름답다 زیباست قلبی که درد دیگری را بفهمد.
💊42❤27
اگه دلت تنگشه گوش کن .. 🖤 @AhanGawmeh
❤80💔32💊9🍾6👍5🔥4❤🔥1
𝐈'𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝, 𝐈 𝐚𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 ﮼منخستهنیسمخودخستگیم! :)🪦🗿
❤36💔14👍1
با این میکس برید کنسرت همه خواننده ها 😍>> @AHANGAWMEH
❤105❤🔥9🔥9🤯7👍6
…
❤73💔7🍾3
𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒆, 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒊𝒕 هر چیزیو تصور کنی، خلقش میکنی.
❤89👍1🤯1
…
❤71👍6
قشنگه. میپره کنج پلی لیست تون🔥😍 @AHANGAWMEH
❤84❤🔥13👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @AHANGAWMEH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 867,777 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ریمیکس - آهنگ موزیک ترکی” (@AHANGAWMEH), 1,481,693 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AHANGAWMEH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.