Photo, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@AGlhc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002185276968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AGlhc |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 1 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AGlhc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 20 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 21 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 21 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «|尊龙凯时|918博天堂»
Channel name was changed to «PA官方直营|尊龙凯时|918博天堂»
13点温馨提醒:目前尊龙凯时针对平台存款渠道成功率进行了一个排名,同学们可以根据成功率优先推荐存款渠道:EZ钱包,数字人民币,银联WAP,支付宝扫码,卡转卡,支付宝WAP,云闪付,EB钱包,微信扫码,微信WAP,抖音支付,京东WAP。目前尊龙凯时EZ钱包成功率最高,建议大家可以跟用户推荐,同时尊龙凯时EZ钱包有活动,存款返利8%~~ 尊龙凯时,官网充值活动一览: 1.新人存款双重礼,16888见面礼+超值存送劵X3 2.EZ钱包充值上分,8%补贴海量送 3.EB钱包存款上分,每日畅领1266元 4.充值送奖劵,奔驰,手机等你领取 5.存款送抽奖,会员日金条,双飞秘书,等你领取 23分钟
尊龙凯时最新电子捕鱼活动将于4月10日正式上线,每周排名前10的领取红包奖励,同时根据负盈利大小获赠助力金红包~~
|尊龙凯时|918博天堂 pinned Deleted message
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AGlhc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 510,249 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|尊龙凯时|918博天堂” (@AGlhc), 20 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGlhc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.