Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π€πƒπˆπ‘π€π‰π€ 𝟐.𝟎

Channel

π€πƒπˆπ‘π€π‰π€ 𝟐.𝟎

@ADRJHOLMESCHOOL

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

87subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302349463
TypeChannel
Username@ADRJHOLMESCHOOL
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ADRJHOLMESCHOOL

Growth

878887.56 August 2026 β€” 88 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 88 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 87 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87–88 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:2587-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:3188no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:5588first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2022 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2023, 14:26 UTCviews β€”

Channel name was changed to Β«π€πƒπˆπ‘π€π‰π€ 𝟐.𝟎»

19 Feb 2023, 13:01 UTC451 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Konsep untuk adiraja 2.0

  1. Holmes64%
  2. Catur36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Feb 2023, 13:01 UTC392 viewsread 9 August 2026

Hai, adiraja mau comeback loh. Siapa yang semangat? walau proses berjalan lambat, kita tetap masih mendiskusikan hal tersebut. Untuk itu, kita butuh bantuan kalian nih buat milih konsep untuk adiraja 2.0 kedepannya. Ada dua konsep yaitu: 1. Adiraja kembali menggunakan konsep Holmes. 2. Adiraja menggunakan konsep catur. Maka dari itu, kita membutuhkan partisipasi kalian untuk memilih 1 diantara kedua konsep tersebut…

3 Feb 2023, 05:16 UTC351 viewsread 9 August 2026

yg mau join discuss about adiraja 2.0 send id ke @peterandersonbot

9 Nov 2022, 04:24 UTC480 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

ADIRAJA

  1. comeback as Adiraja -like the old one65%
  2. comeback as Holmes4%
  3. gausah comeback, pening.31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ADRJHOLMESCHOOL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Feb 2023, 13:01 UTCFinal Results11 voters

Konsep untuk adiraja 2.0

  1. Holmes64%
  2. Catur36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Nov 2022, 04:24 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

ADIRAJA

  1. comeback as Adiraja -like the old one65%
  2. comeback as Holmes4%
  3. gausah comeback, pening.31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2022 to 27 June 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 776,158 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ€πƒπˆπ‘π€π‰π€ 𝟐.πŸŽβ€ (@ADRJHOLMESCHOOL), 87 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ADRJHOLMESCHOOL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.