Channel
@ABDanielleSmith
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001920235244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ABDanielleSmith |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 27 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ABDanielleSmith |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 160 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
215 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 129 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 52 | 24.2% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 4.19% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.26% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 2.79% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 1.86% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 1.86% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.465% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2023 to 18 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
More great news for Alberta health care. Edmonton’s Misericordia Hospital will see 3x the patients in their new emergency department opening this month. ✅ Lower wait times ✅ 60,000 annual patient visits ✅ Better patient experience Learn more: alberta.ca/release.cfm?xI… https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍25❤13👎2
Alberta's government has increased funding for homeless shelters by 71% and this includes funding 24/7 shelter operations. Homeless shelters are not the permanent solution to this challenge. That is why we're investing in permanent housing programs to make sure everyone has a home in our province. https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍14🤮1
Canada's Premiers stand in solidarity on the carbon tax. We unanimously agree that the carbon tax must not be used as a wedge issue to divide Canadians, but must be applied equitably across our nation. Furthermore, the Prime Minister of Canada has not met collectively with Canada's Premiers since 2018- as healthcare, housing, and affordability still continues to hold Canadians back and there is a clear lack of leade…
👍18❤2👎2🤡1
Great question from this ☎️ radio caller on the future of the federal carbon tax. Here’s my response https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍11❤3🤡1
Alberta's plan is working. Our strategy Stronger Foundations will support 82,000 households by 2031. That's an increase of 40 per cent to our affordable housing supply. https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍9❤1👎1🤡1
Small businesses serve as the cornerstone of Alberta's economy- embodying a spirit of pride, passion, and resilience! As we celebrate 'Small Business Week' this week, I extend my sincere appreciation to every entrepreneur and dedicated employee contributing to the success of small businesses. Your hard work and commitment are commendable. https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
❤14💩2👍1🤮1
BELL: Fresh from the Supreme Court of Canada handing Alberta two points on the environment, Smith is clearly on offence. Link: calgarysun.com/opinion/column… https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍8🔥3🤡1🤮1
AB companies are speaking out. Ottawa has spent billions on electric cars and batteries in eastern Canada. If a fraction of that spending was dedicated to Alberta-based projects, Canada would see significant emissions reductions. https://financialpost.com/commodities/energy/oil-gas/cenovus-oilsands-cut-carbon-fraction-battery-funding https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍6
No one in Canada should be without access to electricity, but if the feds don’t smarten up they will put all of us at risk. https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
💯4👍3👎1💩1
“We’ve seen the Saskatchewan NDP put politics aside and support their provincial government’s opposition to federal regulations that will hurt their province, and my ask is if you would do the same.” https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍5💯3💩1
We are very pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision confirming the unconstitutionality of the federal government’s destructive Bill C-69 legislation. This legislation is already responsible for the loss of tens of billions in investment as well as thousands of jobs across many provinces and economic sectors. The ruling today represents an opportunity for all provinces to stop that bleeding and begin the process of …
👍9🤮1
“Alberta Health Services (AHS) took a big step forward in addressing the province’s nursing shortage.” - CityNews Edmonton Read more: calgary.citynews.ca/2023/10/08/alb… https://t.me/ABDanielleSmith
👍6👎3🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ABDanielleSmith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,319,037 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Danielle Smith” (@ABDanielleSmith), 160 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ABDanielleSmith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.