با خانواده دنیای زبان و مکالمه انگلیسی مثل آب خوردن انگلیسی یادمیگیری😍
اگرم برای شرکت تو دوره های ما سوالی داشتی از طریق آیدی زیر بهمون پیام بدین🥰👇 admin:https://t.me/alirabiee1370
☎️:09353603629
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 294–296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 17:22
295
no change
10 Sept 2026, 16:47
295
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
149
Videos
94
Links
582
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
52.2%
🔥
22
24.4%
👍
19
21.1%
👏
2
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💡 فراموشی لغات، گرامر پیچیده و سردرگمی در یادگیری انگلیسی، شما را ناامید کرده؟ 🎯 وقت آن است که مسیرتان را تغییر دهید!
در English Secrets با درس‌های کوتاه و لغات کاربردی، نکات طلایی گرامری و تکنیک‌های یادگیری کمتر شناخته‌شده، یادگیری سریع و لذت‌بخش می‌شود. 🎓 مناسب همه سطوح و با توضیح فارسی برای فهم آسان. 🔥 همین حالا عضو شوید و دوستانتان را هم دعوت کنید تا با هم یاد بگیرید و پیشرفت کنید!
https://t.me/EnglishSecretswith
تو هم بزرگترین مشکلت گرامر هست؟!
ساختارها رو میخونی ولی همش فراموش میکنی؟ 😐
فقط ببین چی برات آماده کردیم😍👆👆👆
بعد سه سال بالاخره آماده شد 🙋♂️
فقط ببین چه دوره ای برات آماده کردیم که گرامر رو باهاش ضربه فنی میکنی🙅♂️
کلی نمونه تدریس رایگان قبل از ثبت نام در اختیارت میزاریم که خودت کیفیت رو تشخیص بدی و بعدش با65 درصد تخفیف ثبت نام میکنیم😍😍☺️
همین الان کلمه #گرامر رو بفرست و کلی نمونه تدریس رایگان و مشاوره بگیر👇
🆔…
بیایید یه نکته مهم رو با هم یادبگیریم:
Subject + had + past participle
مثال ساده:
🔡I had eaten breakfast before I went to school.
(من صبحانه خورده بودم قبل از اینکه به مدرسه بروم.)
🔡She had left before he arrived.
او رفته بود قبل از اینکه او برسد.
🔡I had eaten dinner before they arrived.
شام خورده بودم قبل از اینکه آن‌ها برسند.
کلمات کلیدی که معمولاً با گذشته کامل میان:
• before
• after
• when
• by the time
…
۳ تا عبارتی که خیلی به دردتون میخوره😉
⭐️اولی:
😂Can I have ….?
🟢میتونم داشته باشم….؟
⭐️Can I have a glass of water?🥹
⭐️Can I have this yellow T-shirt?😍
⭐️دومی:
😂I’m looking for….
🟢دنبال … میگردم...
⭐️I am looking for the bread section🧐
⭐️I’m looking for baggage claim🤔
⭐️سومی :
🔘How much is it?
🟢چقدر میشه ؟ https://t.me/A2vocab
زبان انگلیسی خیلی باحاله حتی کلماتی که فکر میکنیم دیگه معنای سابقشونو نمیدن🤣👇
🔡Watch yourself🤨
🔣مراقب رفتارت باش
🔡Watch your mouth🤐
🔣حرف دهنتو بفهم
🔡Watch out😳
🔣مراقب باش
🔡Watch your step😕
🔣جلو پاتو نگاه كن
🔡Watch your head🙄
🔣مواظب سرت باش
https://t.me/A2vocab
حالا این عبارت به چه معنیه؟👇
Watch your back🙃
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
تحلیل جزیی جمله زیر از یکی از کتاب‌های انتشارات آکسفورد:
Around the same time as Ellis was developing REBT, the American psychiatrist Aaron T. Beck (1921-2021), who was similarly disillusioned with the Freudian psychoanalytic approach, began developing his own hypotheses about the role of thoughts (also known as cognitions) in psychological disorders. Beck noticed that his depressed patients seemed to s…
🔣It’s not rocket science⛷
🟢سخت نیست...
⭐️مثال:
1️⃣Cooking pasta is easy; it’s not rocket science.🍳
🟢پاستا درست کردن آسونه، کار شاقی نیست.
2️⃣Just follow the steps; it’s not rocket science!🙃
🟢فقط مراحل رو انجام بده، سخت نیست! https://t.me/A2vocab
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Signed A-RABIEE
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @A2vocab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 10 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فردوسی‌خوانی @readingferdowsi · 31,753 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دنیای زبان و مکالمه انگلیسی” (@A2vocab), 295 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/A2vocab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
