Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

郑州大学报告频道

@zzdxbgpd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,239subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004372967855
TypeChannel
Username@zzdxbgpd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zzdxbgpd

Growth

3,2313,2393,23511 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 3,231 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 11:33 — 3,239 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:0112 Aug 2026, 11:33
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,230–3,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:333,239+8
11 Aug 2026, 20:013,231first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 3,239 subscribers
Avg views / post
511
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.204%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,229
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
880.0%
👍220.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-12 【老师】:彤彤 【留名】:Dur影(上岸) 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:已经记不清这是第十几次与彤彤相约了。彤彤乃少女心性,佛系开课,挣够了钱就出去潇洒游玩一番,这般洒脱无拘束的状态,也是颇为让人羡慕。 此番得知她要再次回来开课,我便一如既往的第一时间约课,唯一变化的是这回因本人原因没有继续包夜,仅约了个pp略解相思渴。碰巧的是,她这回开课的教室,竟正是我上次包夜时开的那一间,倒像一份意外的惊喜。 按时赴约,叩门而入,彤彤笑脸相迎,仍是青春随性打扮,身材依旧玲珑有致,面上神采更胜,眉眼间透着慵懒妩媚,与早先的青涩娇憨略有不同,也算是别有一番风味。 进屋照旧,先点一支烟,对坐闲聊。说些近日里各自的见闻动态,双方已然极为熟稔,倒也无需客套,如同老相识般。只是她

11 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC136 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-11 【老师】:哟哟 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:7 【综合】:8.33 【过程】:今天郑州下大雨是初击的好日子,在群里闲逛,看见一只双马尾小萝莉,于是果断拍小跟老师约好时间准时到达,进门看见小萝莉躲在门后打了招呼聊了两句,交完水费洗澡老师过来帮我洗给二姨洗的干干净净的,我摸着老师的奶子很大很软很白,洗完用一次浴巾擦干躺床上老师也擦干了过来老师说先给我口一口,我的二弟很爽,老师口得很舒服没有齿感,老师一边口我一边把玩着老师的一对大奶,老师口的很认真不说停一直口,不得不说老师的小穴真的跟紧小穴也不黑粉粉的,口完戴套开始女上摇摇车摇了一会,心想不能一直被压制于是翻身上马传教士起手开干,双手抓着老师的一对大奶一顿输出,后入侧入都试了一遍,一边舌吻一边输出最后顺利出货

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-11 【老师】:小瑞瑞 【留名】:大角牛 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:史家之绝唱了兄弟们,在郑州这段时间历经数次失败,马上到要走的时候了,终于成功了一次,小瑞瑞老师,首先,确定是自聊,有一堆语音做证据,兄弟们尽管放心,并且回复消息速度很在线,约的上门,一下楼,就看到一道倩影,身材不算非常高挑,但比例相当不错,大长腿非常吸睛,一起上楼,来到房间,洗完后,因为这个房间是个loft,懒得上楼了,直接在沙发上开始,靠在沙发上老师半跪着,小嘴一张口了起来,没有任何齿感,各种花样的口,然后是舔胸、调情等等,虽说项目不算很多吧,但是比起绝大多数嫩妹口个三两下就戴套绝对要好上太多太多了,各种花样弄完,感觉差不多了,带上套开始,先从女上开始,很紧很紧,一开始还有点进不去,润滑均匀才进去,这里不得不夸奖一下,小瑞瑞

2

11 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC217 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-11 【老师】:云舒 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:二约云舒妹妹了,约的很顺利,在楼下等了几分钟上楼,进房间前出了点小意外,对面在装修,和云舒妹妹在电梯间聊了一会。一回生二回熟,都是熟人了聊的也很开心。进房间后交水费一起洗澡,身材真是看不腻,胸型和腿直戳心巴,后面床上服务也有了很大进步,干正事想忍都忍不住,直接释放。这次 cj 也是非常满意了,后面多返

11 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC266 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-10 【老师】:艺涵 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8 【过程】:老师没有课室,约了上门。下楼迎接,见到老师,一袭长裙很是很有气质的。来到房间后,寒暄几句,因为洗过澡了就没有让再陪洗了,先从背面开始服务,胸推、阴推,本来今天有些疲惫以为状态不佳,但是经过老师的服务后也是开始来了感觉,接着又是反叼,然后是正面,各种👅,摸着老师的大奶子,最后开始口和深喉,老师口的太舒服了,口了很久,深喉整的差的出来了,叫停开始戴套开干,选择我在上面,因为可以边揉奶子边抽插,老师也是骚话连篇,一会大鸡吧一会想要一会好痒的,直接增加攻速,最后双手撑着老师的腿狠狠出货了,很是放松。

10 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC319 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-10 【老师】:甜圈硅胶娃娃体验馆 【留名】:sugar baby 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:兄弟们,先说结论:爽到头皮发麻! 位置在公寓楼里,全程自助进入,无人化,不会尴尬或者怎么样,一进门,淡淡的氛围灯,一股轻轻的香气,掀开帘子,两个娃娃映入眼帘,说实话,这个距离下,我是不大能看出来和真人的差距,当然再靠近一点还是很容易看出差别的,一个在沙发上坐着,一个在床上半躺着,冲个澡后立刻开始把玩,手感还是可以的,柔软又带着韧性,尤其分量感很足,不会说摸起来虚头巴脑的,皮肤纹理做的很到位,关节很灵活,随便摆弄,来感觉后抹好润滑,戴好套,一进入,毫不夸张地讲比绝大部分的真人都要紧,褶皱纹理非常清楚,而且越往里进越紧,像是要把小老弟给吸进去一样,想起来还有个夹吸功能,摸索着一打开,下体立刻开始又一阵收缩,伴随震动

9 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC352 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-09 【老师】:多多 【留名】:比 尔 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:又是几经波折,终于联系上老师了,得知老师晚上还空着,提上裤衩就前往课室。前面就不多赘述了,到达之后,老师来到电梯旁边接,一眼就看到老师的大高个子和大长腿了,配上超短裤,视觉效果拉满,简单寒暄,和老师一起洗澡,闲聊着,像是和女朋友聊天一样。老师一口一个哥哥的叫着,感觉自己也回到了十八岁。洗完进入房间,赶紧摸摸大长腿和小豆豆,再吃着酥胸。紧接着玩一下69,妹妹口的很温柔,我在下面开始👅穴,妹妹一直小声哼哼,口的我差点受不了,赶紧叫停戴套准备进入。直接传教士,妹妹大长腿自觉的成M型,视觉效果真是太好了,扶着大长腿开始抽插,才第一个动作,没几下就被秒了。这个价位总的来说比较推荐,喜欢嫩妹大长腿的可以冲。

1

8 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC421 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-09 【老师】:Wangyoyo 【留名】:Jack Ted 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:有幸遇到Yoyo老师,第一眼便被出众的气质惊艳,五官精致耐看,妆容得体大方,自带温柔氛围感,颜值气质双双在线。身姿匀称曼妙,体态舒展优雅,一举一动都尽显舒展美感,优越的体态与身材让人忍不住心生赞叹。更难得的是,外在亮眼的同时,满足了我的性癖,使我颅内高潮。始于颜值,陷于身材,忠于服务,遇见Yoyo老师实在是一次超舒心的体验!

8 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC471 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:小沫 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:晚上约好车震,但时间太晚了,快开夜课了,干脆就在夜课兄弟定的酒店附近找个没人的小路车震下,有种ntr的错觉🙈 魏武遗风 顺便拿群友当润滑液使,答应你们,拍完就放小沫走,至于拍了什么,别管,私人珍藏🤣 #小沫 #车震

8 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC384 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:橘子 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:7 【颜值】:6 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:8 【环境】:7 【综合】:7.33 【过程】:昨晚约好的老师头课,今天下午出击,路边就可以停车挺方便,楼上是小公寓隐私性也可以,到走廊老师开的门 进去先独自洗的澡,有鸳鸯浴没要求做,出来趴床上,老师换上小黑丝,背面果冻漫游~跪姿毒龙好像是真舌,然后a面做着聊着天,还挺有意思,老师态度挺好挺爱笑的,爱笑的女孩运气一般不会太差 接着裸口冰火硬了之后女上起手,不过我不喜欢这个姿势,在我的要求下传教士体位开始,一进去好热,水挺多暖暖的,不过没有🐍状态始终一般,最终在半硬状态下123喷射出来

1

7 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:穆子 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:老师个子很高,身材很好,楼梯口接人,做之前聊了会天,我挺喜欢老师的西北口音,听着贼舒服,哈哈 吐槽一个方面,就是没热水,其他都非常好。 老师下面是挺紧的,趴身上也很舒服,正面做了两波很爽,完事老师还给擦擦汗,喜欢嫩妹冲!

7 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC477 viewsread 11 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-07 【老师】:春天 【留名】:类 李 【评价】:👌 中评 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:7 【环境】:9 【综合】:7.67 【过程】:属于慢热型了,有点御女番,如果表现出嫌年龄大,会很不高兴,但是聊高兴了,对你也是热情的,舌头很灵活,全身漫游没的话说,要是对年龄,颜值要求高的话,请绕行,这个姐姐是典型的技术型服务,追求服务的可以来尝试下,类似于南方东莞技术

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zzdxbgpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 326,547 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“郑州大学报告频道” (@zzdxbgpd), 3,239 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzdxbgpd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.