Channel
@zzcgbgt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,949subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001630541084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzcgbgt |
| Description | #郑州 #吃瓜 #树洞 #曝光 投稿联系： @xiaobaocm 郑州靠谱修车群: @zhengzhou167 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzcgbgt |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 15,949 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (6 September 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 32,492 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 72.7% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zzcgbgt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎰 10月白嫖第2发（3天一白嫖一直到10月底） 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-晨子的频道 🎫 加入-郑州大学 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-郑州精品必吃榜 🎫 加入-郑州吃瓜曝光台 🎫 加入-河南郑州师范学院 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-郑州楼凤阁（可搜索附近人） └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 5 条 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 晨子单P白嫖 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 1:群内发言均可参与抽奖 2:参与抽奖者号炸了，退群，奖项作废！ 3.48小时内兑奖，过期作废 4:中奖者转发机器人消息给予管理兑奖！ 5：无用户名不予兑奖，无用户名不予兑奖，无用户不予兑奖，奖品累积下次继续抽取 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年10月08日 23时30分00秒
❤1
来自狼友的真实娃娃体验， 【老师花名】：#郑州成人硅胶娃娃体验馆 琪琪（专属小客服）@qiqikefu11 【内容】：首先我从来没有写过差评，这是第一次写差评，言归正传，今天下班早，闲的无聊，无意间看到有这个硅胶娃娃体验的，首先觉得挺有意思的，打算体验一下，和客户联系好，交了20定金可以抵扣，说是全程无接触，价格是198，298，358，398，客极力推荐398的，说是减30路费，想着要体验就体验好的吧，现在想想不管是多少价位的应该都是那一个，果断选择了398的，到店后一共给了448，说是有100的押金，走了退，交完钱给了房间密码。 首先到门口我发现屋里有人，和客服再三确认下，客服说打扫的保洁还没走，我说里面是男的呀，客服说是保洁的老头，我一整个无语了，这个时候已经没有任何兴致了，我就去楼道抽根烟顺便缓解一下心情，等保洁出来，缓解的差不多了，想着来都来了，体验一把！ 进去之后一个复式，看了下环境，烟灰缸里都是烟头，一楼…
❤3
#郑州 #吃瓜 #曝光台 每天都有人被无良骗子给骗到，实在让人痛心疾首，有这钱花在哪不好。 认准靠谱群聊，认准榜单认证老师，认证老师发言都有机器人点赞，没点赞的全部按骗子处理，或许看榜单这边的照片没那么惊艳没那么好看，但是最起码都是实地认证过的真老师，不会被骗到。 最后，记住最终原则： 1:见不着人，不给钱 2:见着人了人照不一、完全不喜欢，不要来都来了，转身 3:见着人了，喜欢，但是有风险，依旧转身 最后，祝兄弟们都能找到心仪的老师，都能日的舒服。日的开心！
❤5
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_494790285
❤1
#郑州 #吃瓜 #曝光台 茶楼最新大瓜，应该是茶楼跟👮🏻♂️有个合作，应该是👮🏻♂️缺业绩就去群里弄，茶楼个别管理带的妹子受保护。
💩6❤1
#郑州 #吃瓜 #曝光台 各位群主最近防护做好点，这个叫大雄的打我名号，搞人家群，我跟这个沙雕不认识，哪个群的管理自己管管哈。
#郑州 #吃瓜 #曝光台 射了还是没射，这是一个问题，有没有这方面的专家能识别出来这些乳白色液体是什么的，难道说除了JY，男性还能分泌出类似的液体？
❤4
#郑州 #吃瓜 #曝光台 避雷哈兄弟们，以前叫婉宁，人照不符投诉下榜了，又换名字继续来了，
❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @zzcgbgt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“郑州吃瓜曝光台” (@zzcgbgt), 15,949 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzcgbgt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.