🎉 崽崽 @lz1262 的优惠券福利 🎁 奖品清单 • 崽崽的200通用优惠券 × 2 • 崽崽口令红包🧧18.8元 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 金华义乌福利社 • 加入 金华义乌福利社-在榜老师 • 加入 江浙沪精选探花 • 加入 金华义乌福利社-公告频道 • 加入 崽崽朋友圈 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:10撒币 • 祝福上限:无上限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-10-13 12:12:00 📜 抽奖说明 开奖三日内有效 老师问题可延期 转赠需要老师同意 ✨ 愿命运之剑指引你们前行,直至胜利之光照耀每一个人。

Channel
崽崽朋友圈
@zz688666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004382231874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zz688666 |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zz688666 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 334 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 21 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 162.1%
- avg views ÷ 334 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 541
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.307%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (21 September 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,495 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 21s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 4 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
开课 🉑预约
满
【金华义乌福利社】@yiwugo 【评价时间】:2026-10-05 【老师名字】:崽崽 @lz1262 【验证留名】:水水大王(修养生息一百天) 【人照颜值】:一个月不见,更漂亮了 🤩嘿嘿嘿我给一百昏! 【身材点评】: 感觉崽崽变瘦了,但是胸没有哦,依然坚挺,一只手正好握住,我非常喜欢呀这个腰臀比也很好 【老师类型】:嫩妹,毒舌ly讲话要小心点不然容易被骂呜呜呜呜 【相处感受】: 一个多月没见了,崽崽一进门就给我打招呼,好久不见,然后给我来个雷霆大坐。还是熟悉的感觉熟悉的香味嘿嘿嘿嘿 【交通便利】:停车非常方便,位置也很好找 【过程描述】: 崽崽休息了很久啊,听到这次回来,也是赶紧约上,只能委屈一下水水的钱包了,本来想约头课的,但是没了但是又因为一些原因,吼吼吼吼吼吼还有头课吃嘿嘿 比崽崽先到就先进课室了,不一会崽崽就来了,进门就给我一个雷霆大作,然后跟我打了招呼好久不见了,然后洗澡我们互相洗了之后擦干上床,先是躺在聊了…
女明星从美国回来了🤩
🈶🈳
开课了
Photo, posted without a caption
🤡4👏1
我觉得我强的可怕
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤1👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zz688666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“崽崽朋友圈” (@zz688666), 334 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zz688666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.