(all'atto pratico, non cambia nulla, ma la giustificazione teorica merita senz'altro qualche virgola in più)
❤1

Channel
@zwitterio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
253subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001260990974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zwitterio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zwitterio |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 253 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 255 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 256 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 256 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 44.8% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 20.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 10.4% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2023 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(all'atto pratico, non cambia nulla, ma la giustificazione teorica merita senz'altro qualche virgola in più)
❤1
Stavolta abbiamo una buona giustificazione per pubblicare una nuova edizione di ogni libro di chimica organica esistente in commercio
👀2👏1😨1
Oggi, nel 1945, l'Armata Rossa liberò il campo di concentramento di Auschwitz. Questo giorno non ha solo la funzione di ricordarci gli orrori del nazifascismo, ma anche quella di prevenirne la reiterazione. Come abbiamo avuto modo di osservare, la conoscenza non è stata sufficiente. Ciononostante, è nostra responsabilità ricordare e spiegare il carattere inerentemente materiale di quegli avvenimenti. Fare le commemo…
❤8👍2
Online the 2nd part of the introductory tutorial on Hy, the #Lisp that compiles to #Python AST and interoperates with its libraries. This episode explores lexical scoped blocks and #macros, showcasing the #metaprogramming capabilities offered by #hylang. https://www.zwitterio.it/en/software/getting-started-with-hy-python-lisp-matplotlib-ep-2/
❤5😁2
Drastico crollo dell'estensione del ghiaccio antartico quest'anno (barra in rosso)
😢6😭1
I wrote an introduction to the Hy language 👀 (basic Python knowledge required, nothing more) https://www.zwitterio.it/en/software/getting-started-with-hy-python-lisp-matplotlib-ep-1/ Anche su dev.to: https://dev.to/gicrisf/getting-started-with-hy-the-python-lisp-a-simple-matplotlib-example-ep-1-2deb
👍3
Riprogrammare il midollo osseo di pazienti con malattie genetiche legate all'ematopoiesi *senza passare per un donatore*? Una strategia basata su mRNA in nanoparticelle lipidiche: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade6967
👍3
(Non avrei mai pensato alla regressione lineare in questi termini)
🤯1🥰1
Più passa il tempo, più le mie energie per crosspostare vanno esaurendosi. Quindi, se vi va di passare, sul socialino cattivo ho fatto un piccolo bilancio degli acquisti libreschi di questa settimana. (Io molto contento e sempre felice di parlarne nei DM/su Telegram per spunti nuovi). https://instagram.com/stories/gicrisf/3147626616543488095?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igshid=YTUzYTFiZDMwYg== Buona domenica a t…
❤9👏1
Non solo è eucariotica, ma è persino più piccola di CRISPR, quindi i potenziali vantaggi in clinica risultano al momento persino difficili da immaginare. È già stato dimostrato che è possibile riprogrammare Fanzor (la nucleasi) per lavorare con genoma umano (anche in vivo).
❤1
Un'endonucleasi guidata da RNA che ricorda CRISPR/Cas9, ma che lavora in *eucarioti*: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06356-2 Sconcertante la velocità con cui si sta muovendo il settore dell'editing genomico. Tra l'altro, l'articolo è firmato da Feng Zhang, uno dei pionieri dei sistemi Crispr-Cas.
❤1
Buon pomeriggio a tutti! Giovi ed io vi ricordiamo della diretta di stasera, alle ore 20, dove divagheremo in lungo ed in largo sulle nostre letture! La diretta sarà sul mio profilo Instagram etereeflogisto_ Vi aspettiamo! 🥰🤗
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zwitterio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Divagazioni Zwitterioniche” (@zwitterio), 253 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zwitterio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.