The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
📱 5G-Zwangsverstrahlung+Lösungen
@zwangsverstrahlung
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001740093367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zwangsverstrahlung |
| Description | Aufklärung - Funk & Storm (Elektrosmog) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zwangsverstrahlung |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 162 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 162 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 331
- Videos
- 157
- Links
- 190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 41m 21s
- Average length
- 10m 20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 60.4% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 20.8% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 13.2% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2024 to 3 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Frequenzen (ELF und SLF) Hirnwellen und Bewußtsein Sind Gehirnwellen Beeinflussbar? Und umgekehrt können wir mit unseren Gehirnwellen unsere Umgebung beeinflussen? Jede Frequenz ist künstlich erzeugbar. Ebenso können Gehirnwellen direkt ausgelesen werden. In Zeiten von HAARP und Mind Control lohnt sich ein genauer Blick auf die vorliegenden Fakten. Sowohl im Nieder- als auch im Hochfrequenzbereich wird aktiv Forsc…
👍13❤2
Viele können auch nicht denken durch die ! funk Verstrahlung ! massiver art ! Handy. Smart t v, Modem HAARP und so weiter https://t.me/zwangsverstrahlung 👈🏼
💯2
HAARP befand sich in Alaska und war eine der Geheimwaffen der Elite zur Wettermanipulation. Die HAARP-Maschine sendet Millionen Volt Elektrizität in die Ionosphäre, erhitzt Partikel in der Luft und verursacht massive Wetteränderungen. Die US-Regierung hat Jetstreams manipuliert, Länder vom Regen abgeschnitten, die Sonne blockiert und viele Hurrikane verursacht, einer davon war Katrina. Aus diesem Grund erleben wir ma…
🤬7
Es wurde festgestellt, dass das Aluminium in Chemtrails in direktem Zusammenhang mit Umweltschäden, Alzheimer und Autismus steht. @zwangsverstrahlung 👈🏼
👍8❤1
Wird das Wetter bewusst gesteuert? Ja wird es ! "HAARP", die Wettermodifikation als Waffe!! Alles ist vor unseren Augen, seit 1985! Google einmal das Patent 4686605 und du wirst verblüfft sein, dass HAARP bereits 1985 zum ersten Mal patentiert wurde und quasi seit 1987 im Einsatz ist. @zwangsverstrahlung 👈🏼
Tausende AT&T-Kunden landesweit von Mobilfunkausfall betroffen – einige konnten keine Notrufe tätigen. Tausende AT&T-Kunden waren am Dienstag landesweit von einem Mobilfunkausfall betroffen. AT&T-Kunden konnten Anrufe zwischen anderen AT&T-Kunden tätigen, Anrufe zu anderen Anbietern wie Verizon kamen jedoch nicht durch. 🫡 Kompletter Report @Cuekanal ✅
SIE GEBEN ES JETZT ZU ‼️Meteorologe warnt vor "Wetter-Kriegen" Könnte künstlicher Regen außer Kontrolle geraten? Ein Experte warnt davor, in die Prozesse der Natur einzugreifen. Die Regenfälle in Dubai und an anderen Orten der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate (VAE) Anfang der Woche waren so stark wie lange nicht. Es wurden Vermutungen geäußert, dass die Regierung Wolken zuvor künstlich geimpft habe – was von den Behö…
❤2👍1
🚰 🇩🇪 ZDF Schutz im Wasser 26.5.2024 ( Flouride und Klärschlamm ) Sicher überall in Germany @Cuekanal 👀👍
Ehemalige Militärärzte geben an, dass Chemtrails Bariumsalze, menschliches Plasma, Mikroviren, nicht-terrestrische Nano-Silizium-Maschinen und giftige Aerosole enthalten und sogar zur Verbesserung der „Biokodierung“-Frequenzübertragungsfähigkeiten verwendet werden können, um eine unterstützende Grundlage für „Denken“ zu schaffen -basierte DNA-Kriegsführung“. @zwangsverstrahlung 👈🏼
👍6💩1
Das „schwarze Gold“ des 21. Jahrhunderts sind Daten. Dieses Mikrowellenstrahlung aussendende Spinnennetz wird es Big Data/Big Telecom und Big Brother ermöglichen, zu erfassen, was in jedem Moment des Lebens innerhalb und außerhalb jedes Menschen geschieht. 5G hat fast nichts mit der Verbesserung Ihres Lebens zu tun ; Es geht darum, Ihr Leben zu kontrollieren, Produkte zu vermarkten und Ihre Daten für Zwecke der künst…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zwangsverstrahlung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 265,072 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📱 5G-Zwangsverstrahlung+Lösungen” (@zwangsverstrahlung), 162 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zwangsverstrahlung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.