Channel
@zvezdnypytt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003964322267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zvezdnypytt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zvezdnypytt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 15 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 16 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 16 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 80.0% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем приветули тигры и тигрицы, извиняйте, что не было так давно постов, на связи админ #человекпаук ───⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱─── сегодня у нас была проверка бота: @Angel_linbot Админ: не дали Ситуация: Привет, можно выговориться?... Поддержка и советы —/10 Грамотность админа –/10 Скорость ответа 0/10 Приветствие —/10 Тг канал 10/10, ну вроде все есть, хоть где то поставлю 10, что бы не был слишком низкий итог. …
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
Всем приветули, на связи #человекпаук ───⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱─── Сегодня я брала интервью у хорошего бота: @BlackStar11_Bot и вот что из этого вышло. 1. Ваша должность и псевдоним Я владелец данного бота — #нимфа 2. Как вам пришло в голову название бота? Сколько вы думали? Сколько времени потратили на создание и развитие ? Название как то само нашло наш. А развитие мы все еще развиваемся, нельзя сказать что мы уже сил…
❤4
Всем приветули тигры и тигрицы, извиняйте, что не было так давно постов, на связи админ #человекпаук ───⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱─── сегодня у нас была проверка бота: @RooyalGuard_bot Админ #Вильян Ситуация: Мне ни хватает времени буквально ни на что, все время занимает учеба, просыпаюсь рано утром и иду в колледж, прихожу с колледжа учу домашку на завтра, если не задали, то на другой день недели, потому что я просто не успе…
❤4🍓2🕊2❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Всем общаг закидываю, прокидываю, с вами снова я #сущность Сегодня была проверка бота: @help_from_heavenbot Жертва: #дэль Ситуация: Короче недели так 2 назад, кошка умерла, она была уже старая и пора ей было на покой, + подхватила 3 вируса и старались держать дома и выводить на поводке, чтобы еще что-то не подцепила. Мне просто сука жалко её, что кучу моментов с ней пережила и она вот так просто взяла и умерла, есл…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Всем снова салют тигры и тигрицы, на связи админ #человекпаук ───⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱──⊰✫⊱─── сегодня у нас была проверка бота: @angelic_dawn_bot Админ #ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕜𝕠𝕥𝕒 Ситуация: У меня был парень, и есть подруга, парень меня бросил, и ушёл к моей подруге, мне было так обидно, когда мы встречались, я ему дарила подарки, и эта подруга тоже, и он отделил её подарки, в раздел *любимая, это было так.. Я плакала долго, и всегда, я не мог…
❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @zvezdnypytt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zvezdnypytt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Звёздный путь //тгк проверок ботов” (@zvezdnypytt), 15 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zvezdnypytt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.