#奶味小仙女 #套路直播 #单人 #厚丝袜 内容简介: 以双马尾、洛丽塔与JK风格造型为主视觉的单人套路直播。 搭配厚白丝、白过膝袜与小皮鞋,包含红绿灯、寸止、指令互动、倒计时与盯视等经典元素,整体节奏感强,氛围沉浸。 作者简介: 奶味小仙女 是一位以套路直播与丝袜元素见长的创作者,作品常结合洛丽塔/JK风格与指令式互动,适合喜欢沉浸式内容的朋友。 风格标签:#厚丝袜 #洛丽塔 #套路直播
🎉1

Channel
@zukongshaonvzhen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108,274subscribers
+175 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002044094735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zukongshaonvzhen |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zukongshaonvzhen |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 108,274 | +96 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 108,178 | +94 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 108,084 | +48 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 108,036 | -41 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 108,077 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 108,099 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,054 |
| Reactions total | 160 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 35 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 22.5% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 13.8% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 5.63% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 3.13% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#奶味小仙女 #套路直播 #单人 #厚丝袜 内容简介: 以双马尾、洛丽塔与JK风格造型为主视觉的单人套路直播。 搭配厚白丝、白过膝袜与小皮鞋,包含红绿灯、寸止、指令互动、倒计时与盯视等经典元素,整体节奏感强,氛围沉浸。 作者简介: 奶味小仙女 是一位以套路直播与丝袜元素见长的创作者,作品常结合洛丽塔/JK风格与指令式互动,适合喜欢沉浸式内容的朋友。 风格标签:#厚丝袜 #洛丽塔 #套路直播
🎉1
Video, posted without a caption
👍2💯1🥴1
#萌梨梨 #yywwyy808 #萝莉 足控系列的瘦小贫乳福利姬会员定制内容【第二弹】
❤2💯1🔥1🥴1
#百合 #女同 #卫生间 #自慰 内容简介: 两位女性逛街时在商场卫生间发生的私密互动。 整体氛围大胆,场景私密,完成度较高,适合喜欢百合与特殊场景向内容的朋友。
❤1👍1💯1🔥1😁1
#萌梨梨 #yywwyy808 #萝莉 足控系列的瘦小贫乳福利姬会员定制内容【第一弹】
❤1👍1💯1🔥1
#老频道遗留产物 素人系列 棉袜 校服 白袜 足交
❤3🐳2💯2👍1🥴1
#依依丫丫 😶🌫️ 裸足 模拟足交 足交 合集
🥴2💯1🔥1
#腻迪美少女 #推特 #aghf1314 #裸足 🦶🦶🦶 裸足 足交 足射
❤1👍1🤯1
#南国足艺 #超薄丝袜 #纯舔脚 😛😛😛 超薄肉丝 tk 挠脚心 舔脚
💯1🔥1🥴1
#原创视频 #射鞋 ❤️ 群友原创视频楼道 女友棉袜套鸡 用鞋撸管
👍2💯1🔥1
#丝足 #恋足 洗脚城里的靓丽风景!
🎉2💯1🔥1
#投稿 #丝足 看看有多少哥哥稀罕我
❤1👍1🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @zukongshaonvzhen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“足控之家|虐阳社【NSFW】” (@zukongshaonvzhen), 108,274 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zukongshaonvzhen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.