Channel
@zuixintongzhipindao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,264subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003526240837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zuixintongzhipindao |
| Description | 关注一下我的频道，以免有冒充！ 收一切产值粉上码，Q群，依旧真粉包结算，提供过滤后台！ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zuixintongzhipindao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 1,264 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 1,264 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 September 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 16,960 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 好粉好渠道 大量收负责一手工作室来报 全天24小时卡密 应有尽有 收一切好粉 支持担保预付 抖音自热 橱窗 陌陌聊天室 金铲铲 抖音自热V转 抖音同城热评V转 抖音点赞 抖音语音厅 直播甩码 陌陌语音厅 小红书自热 王者 各种游戏 相亲小平台 各种姿势均可来问价 单价置顶 任何真粉 好粉 有量都可以来聊聊 价格包你满意 可以预付 可以担保 拿着你的实力找我换钱 @mugua123 木瓜 @fengxi876 斌少1号 @maque1 麻雀 @honghu555 鸿鹄 天青色等烟雨 而我们在等你❤️ 最新通知频道 @zuixintongzhipindao
❤1
无限收王者自定义头像 一天2w 有量的来
带设备的抖音千粉实名号， 还有抖音地推老 有没有要的
❤1
有没有抖音号商， 来几个
9月最佳管理
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
兄弟们， 动一动发财的小手
抖音系列 抖音同城定位、抖音自热v、抖音协议点赞、抖音橱窗、抖音直播 陌陌系列 陌陌聊天室、陌陌拉群、陌陌纯动态 、陌陌狼人杀 游戏系列 金铲铲协议、王者招募， 王者附近人 探探、灵魂、付费相亲平台、 过滤多少你来说，一切价格可跟， 出粉联系✈️：@mugua123 @@fengxi876
中秋月圆，感恩一路信任与支持。祝大家阖家团圆，万事顺遂，佳节安康！
通知：马上有钱卡密 微信QQ 刷新提码页面 特专属不死二维码
谁有能换绑飞机的卡
王者抓包号 女号女头像 有这种号的联系我一下 @mugua123
王者招募 王者附近人， 有量来报，价格置顶 价格置顶 价格置顶
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zuixintongzhipindao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
9月最佳管理
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“木瓜通知频道永久id@mugua123” (@zuixintongzhipindao), 1,264 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zuixintongzhipindao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.