Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 华人大事件🌎华人网

Channel

华人大事件🌎华人网

@zuixin

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,558subscribers

+496 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001861089137
TypeChannel
Usernames@huarenwang @zuixin
Description华人大事件 华人网 东南亚大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 易记ID: @huarenwang 《🆔华人网全拼》 投稿客服: @huarenwangKFBot #华人 #亚太 #迪拜 #缅甸 #金三角 #菲律宾 #泰国 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #华人大事件 #华人新闻 #海外华人
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zuixin

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@xinwenAAA/436207 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC@zuixin/14051 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC1.0049 minutes
@xinwenAAA/437308 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC@zuixin/14088 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC1.0013 hours
@xinwenAAA/437368 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC@zuixin/14090 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC1.0012 hours
@xinwenAAA/438469 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC@zuixin/14129 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 01:09 UTC1.009.8 hours
@xinwenAAA/438499 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC@zuixin/14126 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC1.009.4 hours
@xinwenAAA/4492019 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC@zuixin/14643 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC1.009 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@xinwenAAA7 (6/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009.9 hours@xinwenAAA (7–0)
@jpzgl86 (5/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.9 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 83 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,2767,5585,4177 August 2026 — 7,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,061 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,059 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,059 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,000 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,013 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,950 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,944 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,907 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,907 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,988 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,982 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,010 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,003 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,979 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,870 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,736 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,510 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,389 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,130 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,789 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,534 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,272 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,094 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,636 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,408 subscribers26 September 2026 — 3,729 subscribers28 September 2026 — 3,719 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,608 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,607 subscribers11 October 2026 — 3,439 subscribers11 October 2026 — 3,439 subscribers14 October 2026 — 3,363 subscribers14 October 2026 — 3,363 subscribers17 October 2026 — 3,372 subscribers17 October 2026 — 3,372 subscribers20 October 2026 — 3,381 subscribers21 October 2026 — 3,377 subscribers23 October 2026 — 3,378 subscribers24 October 2026 — 3,374 subscribers26 October 2026 — 3,366 subscribers27 October 2026 — 3,337 subscribers28 October 2026 — 3,341 subscribers30 October 2026 — 3,285 subscribers1 November 2026 — 3,276 subscribers2 November 2026 — 4,336 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,569 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,570 subscribers7 November 2026 — 5,557 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,543 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,558 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 96 days, net +496. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,634–8,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:167,558+2,015
9 Nov 2026, 06:285,543-14
7 Nov 2026, 08:155,557-13
5 Nov 2026, 11:295,570+1
4 Nov 2026, 06:515,569+1,233
2 Nov 2026, 19:454,336+1,060
1 Nov 2026, 02:213,276-9
30 Oct 2026, 10:483,285-56
28 Oct 2026, 18:513,341+4
27 Oct 2026, 07:553,337-29
26 Oct 2026, 03:213,366-8
24 Oct 2026, 17:143,374-4
23 Oct 2026, 06:093,378+1
21 Oct 2026, 12:183,377-4
20 Oct 2026, 14:543,381+9
17 Oct 2026, 23:103,372no change
17 Oct 2026, 22:153,372+9
14 Oct 2026, 22:063,363no change
14 Oct 2026, 18:383,363-76
11 Oct 2026, 16:163,439first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.19%
avg views ÷ 7,558 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.4
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
30
of 113 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held113 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total431
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,800
Videos
≈2,490
Links
≈66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 00s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC9 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

🇲🇾马来西亚沙巴凌晨惊传持械入室抢劫!4名匪徒乘白色Alphard闯住宅区,居民紧急提高警惕! 沙巴州哥打马鲁都一处住宅区据报发生持械入室抢劫案。根据目前提供的信息,事件于2026年11月11日凌晨约3时,发生在Taman Perumahan TNG 3。 据称,约4名嫌疑人乘坐一辆白色丰田Alphard抵达现场,并以锋利武器威胁受害者,随后破门入室抢劫。嫌疑人及车辆目前情况不明,案件详情仍有待进一步核实。 警方是否已接获投报、是否有人受伤或财物损失,现有信息未作说明。居民如发现可疑车辆或人员,应避免自行接触,并尽快向警方通报;夜间也应确保门窗上锁,加强居家安全

12 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC9 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

戴着手铐上班!这不是电影特效,是境外诈骗园区的真实日常! 听信海外高薪、包机票包吃住的招工广告,满怀憧憬出国赚钱,结果直接掉进人间炼狱。自由被完全剥夺,被逼迫坐在电脑前不停行骗。完不成业绩,打骂、体罚接踵而至,甚至被威胁:死也要死在电脑前面! 一边承受园区的折磨,一边被迫去欺骗国内的亲友,想求救都无路可走。

12 Nov 2026, 02:37 UTC10 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#群友投稿:最近老挝有不少捞人反被抓的事,大家有没有刷到? 万象有个翻译,想去帮被抓的中国人打听情况、想办法捞人,结果人没捞出来,自己当场被扣下调查。还有个中国人开奔驰跑到电诈抓捕现场捞人,直接一并被带走。还有很多同类事件没对外报道。赚钱有风险,捞人一定要谨慎。 很多人会疑惑:我只是帮朋友问问情况,怎么自己也出事?今天结合真实案例跟大家聊聊。 最近找我处理案件的人特别多,一天几十条咨询,有涉嫌电诈、贩毒、非法持枪,还有电子烟批发、送货的。我发现一个普遍问题:家属朋友过来,大多会隐瞒实情、避重就轻。明明是电诈骨干,只说自己就是打工的;查到大量毒品,说只是自己吸食;房间搜出几百上千支电子烟,还说不是用来卖的。 很多人觉得卖电子烟是小事,但在老挝,电子烟管控很严,大批量批发、运输、销售属于严重刑事风险,不是交点罚款就能了事。前两天有个做电子烟批发的网友找我,他手下很多送货的被抓,问我能不能摆平。他说以前花钱就能解决,现在…

12 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC11 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#柬泰边境:11月11日晚上9点10分,泰国军方在奥多棉吉省奥斯梅县开火,目的是挑起柬埔寨战争。

12 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC11 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:吉打移民局突袭建筑工地,30名外籍人员被捕,涉及孟加拉、缅甸及印尼籍 11月10日上午,马来西亚吉打州移民局展开名为 Ops Sapu 的执法行动,突袭位于双溪大年 Bandar Amanjaya 的一处建筑工地,对现场49名外籍及本地人员进行身份检查。 行动中,执法人员共扣留30名涉嫌违反移民法令的外籍人员,其中包括17名孟加拉国籍、12名缅甸籍及1名印尼籍人员。据悉,被扣留人员包括27名男性及3名女性,年龄介于20岁至50岁之间。 行动结束后,30名被捕人员被送往 Belantik 移民拘留中心,以接受进一步调查及处理。有关部门将继续调查涉案人员是否涉及违反马来西亚移民法令。 此次行动再次体现马来西亚移民执法部门持续加强对外籍劳工及非法居留人员的检查力度。

12 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC11 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:🇰🇭西港南海后门海之港酒店被围了,据说是有人打野,来了20多个宪兵把酒店封了。

11 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC22 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#老外投稿:几年前,我和朋友去普吉岛度假。我之前去过泰国,自认为对那里的夜生活有所了解。 我还特意叮嘱朋友,不要在酒吧里爱上哪个女孩,因为我知道,这样很容易就会失去理智。 旅行开始几天后,我的朋友就迷上了酒吧里的一个女孩。她还有一个比较害羞的泰国朋友,我姑且叫她 Mint 吧。Mint 一开始并不是我喜欢的类型,但和她相处了几个晚上后,我开始对她产生好感。 很快,我们几乎每天都形影不离。我们一起去海滩、外出吃饭,在我的酒店看电影,她几乎每天晚上都陪着我。她告诉我,她讨厌在酒吧工作,想好好学习,以后找份更好的工作。 旅行结束时,我已经爱上了她。她告诉我她爱我,我也回应了她。两个月后,我又回到了普吉岛。接下来的一年里,我去了好几次,因为我想见她。 奇怪的是,她从来没向我要过每月的生活费。我觉得这是个好兆头,因为我总是把她和那些向我要钱的女孩的故事做比较。 然后,一天晚上,她打电话告诉我,她怀孕了。 距离我上次见到她已经…

11 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC16 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

印尼警方在菲律宾秘密抓捕数十名网络诈骗嫌疑人,涉案人员正被押送回国 11月10日,印尼国家警察总长苏尤迪·阿里奥·塞托(Suyudi Ario Seto)透露,印尼警方近日在菲律宾展开秘密执法行动,成功抓获数十名涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动的人员,目前相关嫌疑人正被安排押送返回印尼。 据介绍,此次行动主要针对在菲律宾境内活动、以印尼国内民众为诈骗目标的跨境网络诈骗人员。 苏尤迪表示,警方已经成功控制一批涉案人员,并正在办理押送回国相关事宜,以便进一步调查案件。 目前,警方尚未公布具体抓捕人数、嫌疑人身份及诈骗团伙的详细情况。印尼警方表示,后续将由相关部门公布更多行动细节。

11 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

汇旺莫非还有希望恢复? 11月11日,据网友爆料,金边中国大使馆对面出现汇旺相关维权人员,现场还有柬埔寨警察拍照记录情况。 爆料者称,自己当天前往中国大使馆办事时,看到有人在使馆对面维权,汇旺莫非还有希望恢复?

11 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC17 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

据柬媒消息,新的西港省政府办公大楼即将全面竣工并投入使用。 该大楼于2022年3月份奠基,规划建设4层,规划建筑总面积达44000平米,项目计划建设周期为一年半。 结果,该项目建设了4年半,尚未正式启用。 PS:没钱怎么建?🤣🤣

11 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC25 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:8号园区的杨总,请付血汗钱! 在8号园区,波哥山搞医疗的杨总,辛辛苦苦给你打点生意,最后却落到一年的工资一分血汗钱都没拿到。 以前没出事前,还信誓旦旦地说,出了事你来兜底。怎么我回国被帽子叔叔传唤了,没看到你吭一声?我被拘押期间,一个字都没提到你相关的事,最后还是自己借钱保释出来。 现在我只要求付我一点保释金就行,这一点小小的要求,你都当视而不见。本来我也尊重你,但是现在你的处事方式,让我看到了你伪善的一面。 如果还是视而不见,资料我已经全部收集。再拒绝沟通,下次就把你家在金边的工厂地址、家庭住址,以及你跟你亲妹妹的照片全部曝光,让大家在金边好好防范这两姐妹。

11 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:缅甸最近暴雨太多,都淹了不少地方,敲键盘都敲不了,搭建的窝棚都被淹了,太心酸了😭

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @zuixin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“华人大事件🌎华人网” (@zuixin), 7,558 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zuixin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.