Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

新手出击榜

@zuiaibiaoda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004378556470
TypeChannel
Username@zuiaibiaoda
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zuiaibiaoda

Growth

118119118.59 Aug 2026, 09:46 — 118 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:15 — 119 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 09:4610 Aug 2026, 08:15
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:15119+1
9 Aug 2026, 09:46118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
266.1%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
317
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.365%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,332
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍457.1%
342.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC110 viewsread 9 August 2026

bingo_小猫(二刷) 二刷的体验依然在线。 尺度其次了,一半以上时间都在聊天。 总结:也看感觉吧,其实精英上忍更为合适 https://t.me/Bing_go520/28886

7 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC149 viewsread 9 August 2026

库洛可可_兜兜 不愿意透露姓名的群友去过没多久,所以相当于开卷考,压力不大。 人照还是略有差异,属于成熟偏知性的感觉,瘦瘦的,胸倒是挺大,也不抽烟。 情绪价值不错,能聊到一块去。 尺度也是比较配合的,也很主动,没啥拉扯,晚上了也非常水润。由于今天有点感冒,浅浅体验尺度即止。 总结:喜欢嫩妹的群友可能不太合适,喜欢成熟的毫无疑问的精英上忍 https://t.me/kulook_chance/5158

7 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

老徐打赌流: 1.宝宝,你信不信你怎么摸我都起不来? 2.你信不信我把你摸出水了,我的jb也不会硬一秒? 3.摸硬?你就算给我深喉我都不会硬,不信你试试。 ❗山寨焚决,未经本人测试,陨落概不负责

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC177 viewsread 9 August 2026

鹿鼎记_晶晶 去果味糖吃屎前,路过顺便点个钟。 颜值还凑合,小妹妹的感觉。身材感觉比模卡略微坦一点,但也没有某皇帝那种程度。 人比较乖,配合度没啥问题,敏感水润。妹妹很努力得聊天,但是好像也没太多话题。情绪价值一般吧。 总结:适合文明用餐的兄弟,准上忍吧 https://t.me/LudingjiPB/137

6 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC194 viewsread 9 August 2026

果味糖_懒懒 目前长休3个月。 双钟起约,需要排队,身材颜值,情绪价值都还可以。 尺度上,需要每次进步一点点,持续每周都去,非常折腾。送特产速通,应该不太行。 总结:适合手头富裕,时间宽裕的玩家,准上忍 https://t.me/hz_gwrt/307241

6 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC190 viewsread 9 August 2026

养大鱼_橙子(二刷) 刚准备回家,喊着上一个,那就上一个。 努力拉扯1h,未果。 总结:靠体术不太行,或许幻术类有更好效果。中忍级别忍者 https://t.me/yangdayu888/53766

3 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC268 viewsread 9 August 2026

鹿鼎记_布丁 CJ小猫前天塌了,被鸽。那去体验下鹿鼎记新人,摩卡很眼熟,果然是别的店见过的。 瘦瘦的,胸不大,抽烟,手上一点点纹身。 卸甲比较爽快,敏感度水量还可以。情绪价值就比较普通了,随便掰扯两句。 由于上过班,懂事的,尺度上该有的都有。懒得拉扯就送点小礼物了。 总结:还不错的妹妹,准上忍吧 https://t.me/LudingjiPB/110

3 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC267 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

库洛可可_雯雯(二刷) 临时兴起,于是没有打暗号。 情绪价值较高,聊天1个多小时。尺度了浅浅体验下。 最后临走送了妹妹一点家乡特产表示感谢。 总结:投缘的妹妹,过几天再刷,准上忍 https://t.me/kulook_chance/5121

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC262 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

古茗_世一 人比较瘦,胸比较小。 听说有点卡人,果然我被卡了。情绪价值偏低。聊着聊着场面沉默了。 尺度上比较墨迹。脱衣服都能墨迹半天。舌吻推来推去。 沉默20分钟,突然想到体术,舌吻,卸甲,磨棒就都有了。无奈前期过于下头,查克拉不足了。 总结:0主动的妹妹,欺负礼貌玩家,下忍。 使用体术,物理平A,大概率能上忍 https://t.me/gumingpb/2199

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC285 viewsread 9 August 2026

养大鱼_橙子 上古影级忍者 丰满+情绪价值高,不抽烟 光顾着叙旧,尺度上,正常超大。多刷几个钟看看情况 总结:适合需要情绪价值的玩家 https://t.me/yangdayu888/53766

28 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC375 viewsread 9 August 2026

库洛可可_雯雯 人照还是不一样。妆比较淡,也还不错。重点是身材,细枝硕果。偶尔抽烟,没啥味道。 胸比较敏感,但是水量不太行。 主播兼职,由于前面话题太正能量。加上拉扯比较多。导致查克拉枯竭。 后面聊开了,发现是个挺有意思的妹妹。尺度方面比较看心情。 总结:推荐有实力的玩家去。体验可能超过中忍 https://t.me/kulook_chance/5121

27 Jul 2026, 01:39 UTC413 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

椿光_哈哈 小尺度妹妹也是冲了。 高中刚毕业的素人,瘦瘦的,胸小,不抽烟的好妹妹。由于半壁江山,就没拉扯了。纯标大了。舌吻技术还可以,亲的微微一硬。 总结:天天说喜欢素人感标大的群友,真标大又都不去了吗 https://t.me/fujiang003/652315

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zuiaibiaoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 583,355 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“新手出击榜” (@zuiaibiaoda), 119 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zuiaibiaoda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.