Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZENTRITA Official

Channel

ZENTRITA Official

@zttofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

457subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327774891
TypeChannel
Username@zttofficial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zttofficial

Growth

457460458.57 August 2026 — 460 subscribers8 August 2026 — 460 subscribers8 August 2026 — 458 subscribers24 August 2026 — 457 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 457–460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 09:16457-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:37458-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:49460no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:26460first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 457 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held12 (16 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total285
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
635.3%
😁529.4%
🔥423.5%
🤯211.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

室友韓女已經離開加拿大,回布里斯班去了(「回」,是因為她本來就在那定居)😭臨走前我還把一堆陳年 AUD 換給了她,之前學妹來訪換了 SGD,總覺得我逢人就在換外匯…… 重點是,既然都提到了布里斯班,我又開始發表貓本懷念文學。韓女說貓本其實沒有很熟,也許某天貓本能再相見? 蔣勳曾寫:「我向你介紹的巴黎一定不是客觀的,因為我25歲在巴黎讀書,我向你介紹的巴黎其實是我的25歲。」 所以,我每次發表貓本懷念文學時,從來不是在爭論澳洲是否真的比加拿大更好,而是懷念我的20歲。

4

27 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC87 viewsread 8 August 2026

相當典型的 case 啊,值得重視。我手機都有同樣功能的 app,跟 anarchist 那幫人學的,本意對付中國海關......美國好歹仍是法治國家,要起訴走流程,法官說不定還能有不同看法,現在得重新審視一下對策了。

24 Jul 2026, 00:27 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

歪個樓,菲爾茲獎獎金原來只有 15000 加幣,加拿大人設的獎是否還是太窮(

😁3

23 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓❓ 就是在加拿大刷的卡,位置正確是吧❓

20 Jul 2026, 23:07 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

被美帝制裁的公司還是碰不得啊,品控不行,一年就寄了,含淚在價格頂點下單了新 SSD 😭

🤯2

19 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC78 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Ingress Apollo 賽季,又淺淺拼接一下,這兩個月牌子實在太多,不禁讓人覺得是在跑路前最後割一波韭菜。

17 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

所有攻略都說要來這個曾經的世界最大商場,說明愛民屯真沒啥可逛...... 能想像 80 年代確實 fancy,但現在的亞洲人不會覺得稀奇。WEM 單體體量至今仍算很大吧,只是亞洲模式都是十幾個商業綜合體連片。

2

16 Jul 2026, 05:07 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Elk Island 什麼都沒看到,得虧現在國家公園不收門票🫪 再往東邊的烏克蘭小鎮(真居民鎮,不是那個收費景點)還更有趣一些,Mundare 買了特產香腸,這個鎮門口就有一個巨型 Kovbase 雕塑,說是世界最大。我讓店員推薦點辣腸,Jalapeno Cheese 腸口感簡直絕妙。香腸店對門的烏克蘭餐廳,店主特別友善,讓我一定要加酸奶油到羅宋湯裡。 再東邊的 Vegreville 還有個世界最大 Pysanka(烏克蘭彩蛋),草原省地形一望平川,他們好喜歡這種最大雕塑的敘事。

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @zttofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZENTRITA Official” (@zttofficial), 457 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zttofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.