Channel
@ztnb886
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
280subscribers
+164 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004322907153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ztnb886 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ztnb886 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 280 | +161 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 119 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 116 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 116 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,094 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 小昼互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 熬夜 2. 和平78\REX直装官方频道 3. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 4. 七夜改文件官方频道🇨🇳 5. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 6. RKR直装官方频道 7. 陈少改文件主频道 8. 小宇皮肤号🇨🇳 9. 寒冰数据号 10. 李宁公益官方🇨🇳 11. 无缘公益项目频道 12. 秋雨账号 和平账号 其他账号 13. 川少\(免费数据号\) 14. 弥海砂八级号 15. 黑夜的窝 📌 共 84 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/6 页
Signed 小昼互推_Bot
ZT(25.16)追索版.sh
Signed GOS小号
ZT封禁术 pinned «并蒂花第2届科技杯 群聊983716118»
出售频道广告位 @XZBAOBAO 带价来: @XZOVO1206
Signed 小昼互推_Bot
并蒂花第2届科技杯 群聊983716118
ZT封禁术 pinned «拿捏同行🤓 尊敬的客服及相关审核人员您好我怀着愤怒的心态向您举多项严重违规的快手账号 然后发布快手号 该用户以“抓包点号”为噱头恶意封禁他人账号，发布″封号教学"和"恐吓勒索"他人以此牟利，利用网络漏洞窃取用户数据、干扰网络运行，触犯《网络安全法》。还在评论区声称自己会"点号"与他人进行第三方软件私下交易，诱导用户恶意举报，已经严重侵害绿色网民上网的权益。本人在平台内举报处置无果，我已经保留完整证据，恳请核查该账号违规记录，永久封禁账号，整治此类违法行径。 发布完证据后 该用户已经严重违反了快…»
拿捏同行🤓 尊敬的客服及相关审核人员您好我怀着愤怒的心态向您举多项严重违规的快手账号 然后发布快手号 该用户以“抓包点号”为噱头恶意封禁他人账号，发布″封号教学"和"恐吓勒索"他人以此牟利，利用网络漏洞窃取用户数据、干扰网络运行，触犯《网络安全法》。还在评论区声称自己会"点号"与他人进行第三方软件私下交易，诱导用户恶意举报，已经严重侵害绿色网民上网的权益。本人在平台内举报处置无果，我已经保留完整证据，恳请核查该账号违规记录，永久封禁账号，整治此类违法行径。 发布完证据后 该用户已经严重违反了快手的社区规范，核实后请立即封停此账号，还绿色网络一个清净！谢谢。 直举加人工，打掉反馈 @zt18nb6
拜师联系@xijiangyuenb(主攻qq,ks,wx)或者联系@@zt18nb666（主攻ks最牛逼）
都还没出条就掉了
又掉一个笑死我了
破120人直接发
👍2
三个群全掉，我让你们这群小生天天开挂
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ztnb886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 300,322 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ztnb886 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZT封禁术” (@ztnb886), 280 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ztnb886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.