getting back into it after a long break
custom 53033708433828877333

Channel
@zostaffsmartarc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
1,624subscribers
+142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003322185324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zostaffsmartarc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zostaffsmartarc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1,624 | +154 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 1,470 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 1,471 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 1,472 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 1,475 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 1,480 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 1,483 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 1,481 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,482 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,482 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5303370843382887733 | 57 | 87.7% | |
| custom 5303115765275179113 | 8 | 12.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zostaffsmartarc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
getting back into it after a long break
custom 53033708433828877333
kinda stuck on how to run the telegram channel rn, while it's summer i just wanna skate and vibe with the warm weather, btw dropped a new article yesterday on graph engineering in finance https://x.com/zostaff/status/2080655698619142274
custom 53033708433828877334custom 53031157652751791131
I love math You have 100 balls: 50 red and 50 blue. You distribute them between two boxes however you like. A box is chosen at random, then a ball drawn at random from that box. How do you maximise the probability of drawing a red ball? omg - integrals under pressure
custom 53033708433828877334custom 53031157652751791131
haven't posted anything to the channel in a while and honestly kinda glad to tell y'all about it, for a long time i was tryna break myself internally and switch from finance work to some general ai engineering, cuz i caught burnout. now i'm back on finance and i'm actually into it, wrote an article that landed pretty decent with people compared to the last ones turns out i just love finance and there's no getting aw…
i'm getting pulled into ai more and more, dropped 6 accounts i read every day. 1. https://x.com/karpathy — Andrej Karpathy 2. https://x.com/rasbt — Sebastian Raschka 3. https://x.com/AndrewYNg — Andrew Ng 4. https://x.com/drfeifei — Fei-Fei Li 5. https://x.com/demishassabis — Demis Hassabis 6. https://x.com/GaryMarcus — Gary Marcus
custom 53033708433828877332
didn't think gathering my thoughts and recording a video would be this hard, my english on camera turned out, mildly put, not great, so imma just record the video in my native language and slap a translation over it, lucky for me ai lets you do that now. would appreciate if anyone could drop some sick services for video dubbing.
custom 53033708433828877332
going deeper and deeper into ai, even thinking about starting a youtube channel. if you got any ideas around analytics or ai, i'd be happy to make an article on it or do a deeper breakdown. btw i opened up the comments.
custom 53033708433828877335
prompt engineering, my friend was getting paid $70k a year for that role 4 years ago, now that role has merged with the engineering position, kinda interesting to see ai itself forcing certain professions to get absorbed. https://x.com/zostaff/status/2065765842709590018
There's a certain kind of person you see everywhere these days, especially online. He devours information nonstop: philosophy, psychology, productivity, spirituality, neuroscience, business, self-help, history. He's picked up a thin layer of everything and lived almost none of it. His whole sense of self gets organized around understanding rather than doing. He watches videos on confidence instead of just speaking u…
custom 53033708433828877337
right now i'm going deep into ai, studying a bunch of directions watching my friends pull +$10k a month with ai, and they're not phds or top tier programmers honestly ai is what's actually worth diving into right now before this bubble pops https://x.com/zostaff/status/2065069139341742588
custom 53033708433828877332
starting to learn agentic orchestration, the future is in this, hedge funds have been using it for ages and i wanna learn it too don't judge too hard, first article like this, gonna get better from here
custom 53033708433828877338
1M views in 24 hours article went viral, never give up i put a ton of time into this and it paid off
custom 530337084338288773310
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zostaffsmartarc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zostaff (smart arc)” (@zostaffsmartarc), 1,624 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zostaffsmartarc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.