Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زوم🔍 | زیست شناسی کنکور و المپیاد

Channel

زوم🔍 | زیست شناسی کنکور و المپیاد

@zoom_zist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,128subscribers

-5,951 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002571253490
TypeChannel
Username@zoom_zist
Description🔍تخصصی ترین مرجع زیست شناسی🧬💊 یه تیم کامل برای فهموندن زیست شناسی به شما یه عالمه درصد بالای 70 زیست🔥 ارتباط با ادمین: @zoom_admins
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zoom_zist

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

313,0796,5419 August 2026 — 13,079 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,964 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,882 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,813 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,741 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,624 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,425 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,343 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,239 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,943 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,598 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,241 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,030 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,957 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,853 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,717 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,605 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,531 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,474 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,378 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,119 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,498 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,045 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,889 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,728 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,607 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,457 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,356 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,257 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,182 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,128 subscribers7,1289 August 20266 November 2026
35 measurements spanning 89 days, net -5,951. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 08:497,128-54
3 Nov 2026, 03:497,182-75
31 Oct 2026, 03:497,257-99
27 Oct 2026, 23:407,356-101
24 Oct 2026, 14:467,457-150
21 Oct 2026, 04:097,607-121
17 Oct 2026, 20:417,728-161
14 Oct 2026, 23:277,889-156
12 Oct 2026, 03:178,045-453
5 Oct 2026, 07:218,498-621
27 Sept 2026, 05:179,119-1,259
17 Sept 2026, 11:5810,378-96
15 Sept 2026, 07:4110,474-57
13 Sept 2026, 17:3710,531-74
11 Sept 2026, 19:1910,605-112
9 Sept 2026, 04:5610,717-136
5 Sept 2026, 19:1910,853-104
3 Sept 2026, 19:5710,957-73
2 Sept 2026, 11:5411,030+11,027
25 Aug 2026, 21:023first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.952%
avg views ÷ 7,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.8
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held120 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total882
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 07:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
290
Videos
35
Links
100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

405 reactions across 112 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38294.3%
🔥163.95%
🤣30.741%
👍20.494%
🆒10.247%
💯10.247%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🔥یه معرفی کاربردی برای زیست‌خون‌ها در راهه! ✅️تا حالا شده موقع مطالعه‌ی زیست، برای دیدن جزئیات یک شکل مجبور بشی مدام زوم کنی و باز هم تصویر اون وضوحی که می‌خوای رو نداشته باشه؟ 📖 امروز ساعت ۱۲ قراره با یه ابزار کاربردی آشناتون کنیم که تجربه‌ی مطالعه‌ی کتاب درسی رو براتون متفاوت‌تر می‌کنه👀 ⏰ ساعت ۱۲ منتظر معرفی باشید! Zoom🔍 | @zoom_zist🧬💊

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📖 همه‌ی ساعت‌هایی که برای زیست وقت می‌ذاری، لزوماً به یادگیری ختم نمی‌شن! یکی از اشتباهات رایج در مطالعه‌ی زیست اینه که تصور کنیم هرچقدر یک مطلب رو بیشتر بخونیم، بهتر یادش می‌گیریم. اما واقعیت اینه که گاهی چندین بار خوندن یک مبحث، بدون مرور فعال و بازیابی مطالب، فقط حس آشنایی با اون موضوع رو بیشتر می‌کنه؛ نه لزوماً یادگیری عمیق‌ترش رو. مثلاً وقتی کتاب رو می‌بندی، می‌تونی همون مطلب رو با زبان خودت توضیح بدی؟ می‌تون…

🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC46 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📚 معرفی منبع | بانک تست جمع‌بندی اکسیر 🧬 تستی که امروز باهاش به چالش کشیده شدین، یکی از سؤال‌های انتخاب‌شده از بانک تست جمع‌بندی اکسیر بود. 🔍 دوران جمع‌بندی فقط زمان مرور مطالب نیست؛ فرصتیه برای اینکه میزان تسلطتون رو بسنجید، نقاط ضعف‌تون رو پیدا کنید و با سؤال‌های متنوع، قدرت تحلیل خودتون رو تقویت کنید. ✨ توی این مسیر، داشتن یک بانک تست مناسب می‌تونه بهتون کمک کنه آموخته‌هاتون رو بهتر محک بزنید و با آمادگی بیشتری…

🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#جواب صحیح و تحلیل گزینه‌ها✅

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🧠 زیست رو از زاویه‌ی طراح سؤال ببین! 🔍 یه نکته‌ی زیستی رو بلدی؛ اما اگه طراح سؤال فقط یه کلمه‌ش رو تغییر بده، هنوز می‌تونی تشخیص بدی کدوم بخش جمله درسته؟ 📌 اگه دو عبارت از کتاب درسی خیلی شبیه هم باشن، می‌تونی تفاوت‌های ظریفشون رو پیدا کنی؟ یا وقتی چند مفهوم از فصل‌های مختلف کنار هم قرار می‌گیرن، می‌تونی ارتباطشون رو تشخیص بدی؟ ✨ تفاوتِ «بلد بودن» با «تسلط داشتن» دقیقاً همین‌جاست. تسلط در زیست یعنی فقط به خاطر سپر…

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🧬 ساختار پروتئین‌ها رو یه بار برای همیشه جمع‌بندی کن! بین این همه نکته و جزئیات، داشتن یه جمع‌بندی خوب حسابی به کارت میاد؛ مخصوصاً وقتی می‌خوای مطالب رو سریع‌تر مرور کنی و چیزی از قلم نندازی. 📚 توی جزوه پروتکل، ساختار پروتئین‌ها به‌صورت نموداری و مرتب جمع‌بندی شده تا هم راحت‌تر یاد بگیری و هم ارتباط بین نکات رو بهتر متوجه بشی. 👀 این فقط یه گوشه از چیزیه که توی پروتکل منتظرته! اگه هنوز پروتکل رو نداری، می‌تونی از س…

❤1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 06:21 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#جواب صحیح و تحلیل گزینه‌ها✅

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🌱 یه روز تازه، یه فرصت تازه برای پیشرفت! قرار نیست هر روز همه‌چیز طبق برنامه پیش بره؛ گاهی خسته می‌شیم، گاهی از برنامه عقب می‌مونیم، اما چیزی که نباید از دست بدیم انگیزه‌ی ادامه دادنه. مهم نیست دیروز چقدر خوندی یا چقدر از برنامه‌ات عقب موندی؛ مهم اینه که امروز دوباره شروع کنی و برای هدفت وقت بذاری. پس با تمرکز و انرژی بریم سراغ کارهایی که ما رو به نتیجه‌ای که می‌خوایم نزدیک‌تر می‌کنن. 💚 امروز هم قراره یه قدم جلوت…

❤1

3 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📖 کتاب درسی رو واضح‌تر ببین! 👀 جزئیات شکل‌ها و تصاویر زیست رو از دست نده 🧬 نسخه‌ی 4K کتاب درسی با کیفیت بالا آماده شده تا حتی ریزترین جزئیات رو هم واضح ببینی. ✨ مناسب برای مطالعه دقیق‌تر و مرور شکل‌های کتاب 📩 برای تهیه: از کتابچی اقدام کن. 😉 🧬 Zoom🔍 | @zoom_zist🧬💊

❤1🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🧬 زیست رو این‌طوری بخون! وقتی یه پاراگراف از کتاب درسی رو می‌خونی، فقط از خودت نپرس: «چی گفته؟» از خودت بپرس: 🔹 چرا این اتفاق می‌افته؟ 🔹 اگه یه بخشش تغییر کنه، چی میشه؟ 🔹 طراح تست از کجای این جمله می‌تونه سؤال بده؟ 🔹 کدوم قسمت این متن می‌تونه با یه مبحث دیگه ترکیب بشه؟ چون توی زیست، فقط حفظ کردن متن کافی نیست. باید یاد بگیری از هر جمله‌ی کتاب درسی، چند تا سؤال و چند تا نکته‌ی تستی بیرون بکشی. 🔥 از امروز موقع خو…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @zoom_zist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

شما جزو کدوم دسته قرار میگیرید؟

  1. نمی‌دونم چطور درس بخونم 📚23%
  2. نمی‌تونم برنامه‌مو اجرا کنم ⏰44%
  3. زود مطالب رو فراموش می‌کنم 🧠38%
  4. نمی‌دونم از کجا شروع کنم 😵‍💫33%

The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

کنکوری‌ها…! بیشترین درسی که در طول روز مطالعه می‌کنید؟

  1. زیست88%
  2. سایر دروس3%
  3. متغیره!9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

سطح درس زیست‌شناسی کنکور ١۴٠۵؟

  1. بسیار سخت27%
  2. سخت19%
  3. متوسط8%
  4. ساده1%
  5. دیدن نتایج45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زوم🔍 | زیست شناسی کنکور و المپیاد” (@zoom_zist), 7,128 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zoom_zist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.