休息了

Channel
广州小宗蕊
@zongrui11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,999subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003777995358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zongrui11 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zongrui11 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 1,999 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 1,970 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 1,972 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 1,971 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 1,971 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 87.0%
- avg views ÷ 1,999 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,740
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 March 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,480 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【春朝报告】: http://t.me/Chunzhaobaogao 老师名称:小宗蕊 联系方式: 验证留名: lam 上课地点: 南山 验证时间: 7.19 上课价格: 7k/pp 老师年龄: 老师颜值: 10/10 老师身材: 10/10 课室环境: 10/10 服务项目: 满分 体验: 提前预约了时间,满心期待,果然不失所望,身材颜值完全超价格了。更意外的惊喜在于服务,很多大圈除了颜值和身材,态度冷冰冰,技术也一般般。 小宗蕊这技术有些超标,口活好的一塌糊涂,正活就不详说了(洗完澡看到那身材就知道是天选尤物)。第一次很快就缴械投降了,意犹未尽。第二p状态不佳,但依然被口活整的硬邦邦,一顿操作下来大汗淋漓。预算充足的放心大胆的冲,只有惊喜和满意, 优点:可以说是天生魅体,还后天努力锻炼地更加完美。 缺点:好的课室环境就需要接人,如果能在课室直接见面,拥抱然后激吻,那出击体验百分百120分了。
晚上开始工作
休息
羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】( https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #(天河区) 【优势】顶美,身材顶级,颜值顶级,服务到位 【劣势】定位清晰、不好约 【妹子花名】:#小宗蕊 【联系方式】:@zongrui1107 【妹子年龄】:20 【验证留名】:Kev 【验证时间】:6月 【修车水费】:P+P 【颜值】:她的容颜犹如天上的星辰,闪耀着耀眼的光芒。 颜值评分:15 分(满分15分) 【身材】:身材高挑的她,轻盈而优雅。 身材评分:15 分(满分15分) 【服务态度】:她总是有着温和的态度,让人感到宁静和舒适。 服务评分: 15 分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:她的每一个微笑,都是情绪的宝石,闪耀着独特的光芒与价值。 情绪评分: 15 分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排是否合理 时间评分: 10 分 (满分10分) 【同价…
记录一下第一次见面的宝宝pppp
羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #天河 【优势】 【劣势】经常白天健身约不到人 【妹子花名】:#小宗蕊 【联系方式】:@zongrui1107 【妹子年龄】:22 【验证留名】:jing 【验证时间】:6.28 【修车水费】:7000+7000大战四个来回 【颜值】: 颜值评分: 15分(满分15分) 【身材】: 身材评分: 15分(满分15分) 【服务态度】: 服务评分: 15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:爱答不理/正常交流/沟通愉快 情绪评分: 15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排是否合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:不符合价位/符合价位/超出价位 价位评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有无清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分:…
临时有事不过去深圳了,下次有机会再去,这几天在广州开几天休息了
30号去深圳开三天左右,深圳的宝宝今天可以预约了
广州工作啦
明天开始少量工作,提前预约
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zongrui11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 241,455 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州小宗蕊” (@zongrui11), 1,999 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zongrui11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.