全国 头7.30-19.30 包 周 包月API开放 三个银行头接口 放心租赁 @mozi
❤1👍1🤣1

Channel
@zonejdz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,404subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004364149652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zonejdz |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zonejdz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 4,404 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 4,414 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,651 |
| Reactions total | 214 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
214 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 80 | 37.4% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 18.7% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 15.9% | |
| 💩 | 20 | 9.35% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 6.54% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 2.34% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.87% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 1.87% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.935% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.935% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.467% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
全国 头7.30-19.30 包 周 包月API开放 三个银行头接口 放心租赁 @mozi
❤1👍1🤣1
全家户籍等待
❤6🤣1
剑圣 真实姓名 曾宪鹏 已确认真实 正在报单全国公网猎魔
🤣13👍6❤4
开个小号伪造个聊天记录你觉得你能干啥
👍9🤣3❤1💩1
@pinyici 此人为剑圣恶意开小号 截图 伪造聊天记录不敢漏全部 造谣你爹活不起了是吧 找我来租 API你爹不卖给你搞造谣了是吧
❤2👍1🤣1
剑圣你妈嘞个逼模仿你爹 造谣你爹诈骗是吧操你妈
👎5❤2👍1
此人旗下所有个户机器人 全部瘫痪没法使用
👍6👏3❤1
此人为模仿诈骗狗 被诈骗不负责 @TGjiansheng 圈内知名诈骗犯 剑圣 老人物 经常换皮 户籍信息 卓孝建 441581200004013373 剑圣本人 最新换皮 @pinyici 认准墨子四字ID @mozi 其他的都是诈骗犯
😁3👎1🤣1
猫猫个户机器人作者 猫猫 由圈内著名压价大头诈骗犯判毒换皮 此人经常仗着自己客户多源头给他低价他就压市场价 做人不咋行 很多源头都对他不满 今日0.1U市场也是因为此人 为什么换皮叫猫猫呢 是因为此人之前准备跑路圈了一大波客户钱 此人获利手段完全就是靠源头给他低价 压价市场来获取更多的客源 给他接什么项目不管是什么都喜欢压价 用户名 @maomao_kefu 小心此人再次重演跑路事件 估计是这次还没圈够还想多圈一点 以下是猫猫户籍 李张扬 320682200604138632 猫猫本人 吕蔓熙 320682201706150207 张贵明 320622195804158638 张清清 320682199109148643 章勤美 320622195604158641 江苏省如皋市如城街道许庄居四组24号
🤣22❤7👍3🤡2👏1
七夕已经过了,我已经在国产区看到了某位群友,名字就不说了,谁去开房了,自己知道,今天就是疯狂星期四了,希望你主动加我v我50,我把此事压下来
🤣6❤3🤔2😱2👍1
今天七夕希望你们少操点逼 多赚点钱吧 你们这群乐乐
👍3🍌1
收购各种政务接口 地区头也要联系 @mozi
🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zonejdz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,358,571 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zone通知频道” (@zonejdz), 4,404 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zonejdz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.