Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СДЗ

Channel

СДЗ

@zombaktales

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,341subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366335505
TypeChannel
Username@zombaktales
Created23 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zombaktales

Growth

6,3346,3416,337.56 August 2026 — 6,335 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,335 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,334 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,336 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,339 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,341 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,333–6,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:486,341+2
13 Aug 2026, 04:046,339+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:286,336+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:506,334-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,335no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:526,335first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 6,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (25 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total33,350
Reactions total901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 29s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

901 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾48854.2%
🕊16818.6%
🐳13615.1%
🍌10912.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 901reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 17 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zombaktales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,600 views53 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Трамп представил ПЯТЫЙ релиз файлов про НЛО и он настолько потрясающий и важный, что про него никто не пишет и я про него узнал буквально случайно из твиттера. Из интересного: вот этот видос-компиляция в который запихнули всё самое "интересное", что там было, всего четыре видоса. Там опять, по моему мнению, лишь летающие воздушные шарики и квадрокоптеры, но в конце есть другой ролик, где инопланетная сферка пропада

🐳29👾21🍌3

8 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC≈1,740 views77 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Немного новостей науки: - на Солнце нашли магнитные вихри, которые и нагревают солнечную корону в миллионы градусов. Само солнце разогрето до что-то около 5к градусов, а корона горячее его в тысячи раз, ученые понять долго не могли как так, но у них были подозрения, что во всём виновата магнитосфера, вот теперь эти подозрения подтвердились. Плюс там прикольные паттерны, всё это на фрактал, конечно, похоже. - Физик

🍌29👾24🕊20🐳4

7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,650 views39 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Журнал Time тут разродился статьёй "Америка наконец-то поверила в НЛО и воспринимает это серьёзно". В статье ничего нового для нас с вами нет, просто такая краткая выжимка. Мол вот тут Трамп рассекретил архивы. Вот Спилберг кино снимал про дискложу. Вот, значит, Ави Лоб комету обозвал "кораблём-разведчиком". Ну и всё в таком духе. Честно сказать когда уже даже журнал Time про это пишет, то становится понятно что во

👾26🍌8🕊5

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,210 views58 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[10/10] Дальше Роган и Пасулка обсуждают католицизм и туринскую плащаницу, но это не так интересно, как рассуждения о демонической форме пришельцев, так что это мы пропустим. Заканчивает Диана на том, что выпустила свою новую книгу "The Others", в ней, помимо прочего, речь идёт об ИИ как о форме контакта с нечеловеческим разумом. Она ссылается на фильм Спилберга "Искусственный разум" и на "Космическую одиссею 2001 го

👾37🕊14🍌5🐳2

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,770 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[9/10] Зашла речь о личном опыте. Пасулка никогда не видела НЛО или инопланетян, но её родственник видел оранжевый шар над озером Фолсом в Калифорнии. И это было задокументировано в газете того времени. Одна из подруг Рогана уверяла его, что если долго медитировать, то можно наблюдать летающие сферки. Приезжай, мол, Джо, покажу тебе, где у меня Windows надо переустановить, ну и заодно на летающие полупрозрачные сферк

🕊20🍌6👾4

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,280 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[8/10] Роган и Пасулка рассуждают о том, как потенциальная дискложа может повлиять на мир. Хэл Путофф рассказывал Рогану, что во времена президентства Буша старшего администрация президента рассматривала последствия дискложи и учёные (в том числе и сам Путофф) собирали данные в один большой отчёт - как это повлияет на экономику, на религию, на выборы, на образ жизни и всё такое прочее. В общем, тогда пришли к выводу,

👾20🍌6🕊3

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,050 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[7/10] Пасулка рассказывает о книге Билла Купера "Behold the Pale Horse", в ней идёт речь о "тихом оружии", которым является технология, могущая формировать общественное согласие населения. Это некая форма пропаганды, но не прям в лоб, люди ничего об этом не знают и не догадываются, а именно через какие-то образы и полунамёки ты закладываешь людям в голову мысль о том, что вот это и это - правильно, и такое вот - вп

👾22🍌4🐳2

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,350 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[6/10] Вспоминают они и про Розуэлл. По мнению Рогана, если вся история правдива и президент Трумен действительно видел разбившийся корабль пришельцев, то понятно, почему вскоре появились новые технологии (оптоволокно, транзисторы и тому подобное). Если это действительно реверс-инжиниринг инопланетной техники, то её нужно скрывать от врагов. От Китая и России в первую очередь. Но и от союзников тоже не помешает. Всп

👾18🍌5🕊3

3 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,240 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[5/10] Диана Пасулка рассказывает, что ИИ может стать новым способом взаимодействия с инопланетянами. Ранее для контактов с ними использовалась религия, теперь вот - ИИ, который сможет осознать реальность "по-настоящему" и тогда уже понять, чего инопланетянам тут надо. Роган задается вопросом, почему правительство до сих пор не сделало дискложу. Пасулка отвечает, что никто, даже президенты США, не посвящены в тему п

👾19🍌7🐳2

3 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,070 views32 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

[4/10] Пасулка вспоминает про книги Жака Валле (который, грубо говоря, представлял пришельцев такими силами природы, неким процессом контроля, возможно внешними наблюдателями в нашей симуляции), а также Джона Киля (книга "Пророчества Человека-Мотылька"), в которых он развивал теорию "суперспектра" - невидимой реальности вокруг нас, которая включает в себя НЛО, призраков и даже видения Девы Марии. Это самое пространст

👾22🍌7🐳3

3 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,160 views31 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

[3/10] "А вам не кажется", - говорит ей Роган, - "что эти люди, ну которые якобы слышат "пророчества" от инопланетян, они могут быть нестабильны психически или вообще нездоровы на голову? Как они получают эти пророческие послания? Телепатически?" "Конечно", - отвечает Пасулка, - "иногда телепатически. А иногда эта информация приходит к ним во снах". "В смысле? Как они понимают разницу, пророчество ли это от пришель

👾24🍌5🐳2

3 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,380 views38 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

[2/10] Вспомнила она и про Ранчо Скинуолкер, на котором люди видят странные явления и пытаются их изучать, мол многие (например, Гэри Нолан) туда не ездят, потому что боятся "эффекта попутчика". Напомню, что hitchhiker effect это когда ты видишь на ранчо UAP (или, что страшнее - какую-нибудь паранормальную хрень, типа там полупрозрачного оборотня в виде огромного лютоволка на крыше или Бабу Ягу в ступе, которая смот

👾21🐳8🕊6🍌3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @zombaktales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 369,537 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 134,992
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СДЗ” (@zombaktales), 6,341 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zombaktales.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.