Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ali&mina

@zoj66

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

28,304subscribers

-606 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002433569721
TypeChannel
Username@zoj66
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zoj66

Growth

28,30429,05828,6817 August 2026 — 28,910 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,058 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,857 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,652 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,503 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,371 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,304 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -606. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,191–29,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:5728,304-67
12 Aug 2026, 05:3128,371-132
11 Aug 2026, 07:0628,503-149
10 Aug 2026, 03:5628,652-205
9 Aug 2026, 02:3228,857-201
8 Aug 2026, 02:3229,058+148
7 Aug 2026, 17:0128,910first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.19%
avg views ÷ 28,304 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 113 of 116 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held116 (7 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total236,183
Reactions total4,721
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,721 reactions across 113 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,49931.8%
❤‍🔥1,07322.7%
👍94820.1%
👎56411.9%
😍4569.66%
😈1112.35%
💯701.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,721reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,260 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

خانمت خجالتی هست؟ بیارش ما راه میندازیمش کافیه نظرات بچه ها رو بخونه بچه ها نظر بدید 🖇 دانلود فایل

🔥23❤‍🔥6

12 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,370 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هرکس گفت زنم چادری و محجبه هست و همراهی نمیکنه از بی عرضگی خودش هست سهیل به راحتی زنش نسترن که خیلی مذهبی و چادری هست رو اینجوری تو ماشین لخت کرده تا یه فلشینگ جذاب رو شاهد باشیم می‌گفت راننده کامیون ها تو شب عاشق دید زدن خانمم هستن 🖇 دانلود فایل

👎53👍15❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,380 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#اثبات_شده کس زینب جون ۳۲ ساله که شوهرش فرستاده🔥 🖇 دانلود فایل

❤‍🔥19🔥5👎2👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,380 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#ارسالی_ناشناس نرگس خانوم اعضا قبلا هم عکس دادن 🖇 دانلود فایل

🔥14👎6❤‍🔥5😍4

12 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,350 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

زوجیم امیر والی دنبال یه متاهل هم فاز خودم میگردم باهاش تبادل عکس کنم 🖇 دانلود فایل

❤‍🔥19😍5👍3

12 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,540 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اسما ۲۶ زن اعضا میخواد نظراتتون‌ رو راجب زنش بدونه🔥 🖇 دانلود فایل

🔥20👎8❤‍🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,600 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#اثبات_شده ارسالی سوگند هات وایف شیطون و سکسی چنل😈🔥

❤‍🔥44🔥4👍2

12 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,580 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

36 سالمه خانومم 31 سالشه تو سکس همه جوره پایه اس! فحش میده انگشتم میکنه،باتبلاگ کرده توم بعد گفته بکنمش! ولی بعد از سکس از این رو به اون رو میشه! بارها شب خونه ی دوستش مونده،با دوستش که جداشده بارها مسافرت دو سه روزه رفته! می دونه حساس نیستم! ده بار امتحانش کردم ولی هربار شکست خوردم! من دنبال یه نفرم هم خودمو کونی کنه هم خانوممو جنده! کسی که مجبورم کنه عرق تخماشو لیس بزنم! کسی که باعث بشه خانومم درد و بلای کیرشو بن

💯14❤‍🔥7👍3

12 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,520 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#ارسالی_ناشناس ممه ریحانه جون همسرم برای اونایی که بالش نیاز دارن 🖇 دانلود فایل

❤‍🔥27🔥6👍5

12 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,530 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

استایل ریحانه جون همسرم بچهای شهسوار و رودسر نظر بدن لطفا 🖇 دانلود فایل

👍22👎13😈3😍3

12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,580 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سلام اینو پست کن لطفا ما زوج هستیم از شیراز برامون پست گذاشتین گفتیم زوج برای ضرب میخوایم ، هرکس اومده پی وی یا رفتیم پی وی یا فیک بودن نفر سوم بودن یا فقط عکس خواستن یا وسط اشنایی اونجایی که میگی اثبات بده ویس بده خانوم چت پاک شده ... فانتزی رو زهر‌مار کردن و منصرف شدیم .

👍22👎1

12 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,550 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#اثبات_شده یکم زیبایی ببینیم از ایدا جون نامزد اعضا که کم سن و حشری هستن نظرات خوب باشه فیلم هم میدن🔥😈 🖇 دانلود فایل

❤‍🔥31🔥10👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @zoj66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTCAnonymous Poll606 voters

کون کدومشون🔥🍑🤔

  1. خانومش مریم👩49%
  2. شایان خودش👱‍♂️57%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,296 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ali&mina” (@zoj66), 28,304 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zoj66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.