Channel
@znstatus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001343102596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @znstatus |
| Created | 17 June 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/znstatus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 18 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 18 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 June 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2019 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another calendar year comes to a close - with new adventures yet ahead! 😸 Thanks to everyone who's supported me this past year, I really appreciate everything you've done. 🙏 Here's to forging new - and stronger - friendships! 😋
❤1
Hey everyone! To cipher crackers, code breakers and all those out there who enjoy a challenge, I'm pleased to announce a new hidden message game, and to share with you now the first ever public implementation of it! 😁 This system was meticulously designed in my spare time for fun, made to be relatively easy to encode and decode by hand, but still unique enough to really make you think! 😄 I hope you enjoy reverse e…
🔥3
Another calendar year comes to an end 🥳 2024 has been crazy. Although, for me, 2023 was also crazy, 2022 was crazy, 2021 was crazy, 2020 was crazy, 2019 was crazy, 2018 was crazy, 2017 was crazy, pretty much most of the 2010s were crazy, 2011 wasn't too bad tho 🤔 So, until the craziness comes to an end, this chapter of life will remain open no matter the calendar year. But, we look forward to when things get better…
🕊1😁1
Account access was recovered through a long and arduous process. All is well now.
I've recently lost access to some of my accounts, I'm working to restore them, but it's possible that a large swath of my public groups and channels may lose their creator. More updates to come.
Announcement: @znhub has now swapped with @znstatus This channel (previously @znhub) will now be used for status updates under the username @znstatus, and the channel previously used for status updates will now be just for Z Network information as @znhub.
🙏1
Channel name was changed to «ZN Status Updates»
Announcement: @Zacci has now been redirected to @Zaccy
🎉1
Announcement: @znofftopic has now been moved to @zn_offtopic due to Telegram invalidating the old username for some reason.
Hello everyone! Just a small announcement, @z_network has now been moved to @znhub to better keep with the naming convention of other Z Network channels: @zntopic @znfish @zncode @znquotes @znshare Thanks for your support of the network, have a good one! 🙂
❤1
A recent decision by Telegram had been enacted in an effort to purge public usernames from inactive channels. However, some of those channels were made as informational mediums, and not intended as content feeds. Because of this, some of our informational channels had been affected by the purge, having their usernames removed and blocked, without possible access to them again as of now. Due to this occurrence, we've …
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @znstatus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,475,041 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@znstatus named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZN Status Updates” (@znstatus), 18 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znstatus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.