Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zlatiks

Channel

zlatiks

@zlatiks444

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795510657
TypeChannel
Username@zlatiks444
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zlatiks444

Growth

11910 Aug 2026, 09:01 — 119 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:45 — 119 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:0111 Aug 2026, 01:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:45119no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:01119first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.5%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
137
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total687
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5242608820059908118918.4%
💋918.4%
custom 5247138064937030839714.3%
👻714.3%
custom 5217631854361857623612.2%
custom 546971419661253382148.16%
48.16%
custom 542942916860760942036.12%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC60 viewsread 10 August 2026

Во первых я уже отчаялась полностью и собиралась покупать новый телефон Подключила все свои связи, вы даже не представляете какие + все мои друзья пытались чем то помочь, за что я их очень люблю и благодарю Все таки друзья познаются в беде, убедилась сотый раз Много лет назад у меня часто ломался мой 6s айфончик и я уже настолько устала отдавать по 1,5-2к каждый раз, что научилась перепрошивать телефоны сама Что я и

9 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

починила телефон😭 20 дней ходила с лагающим редми...

custom 54294291686076094202

23 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52176318543618576233

21 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC204 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Меня радует одно, все мои самые близкие подруги сразу написали мне А на остальное уже пох Люблю🥺

💋7

21 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC173 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

На моем телефоне левый эпл айди, к которому у меня нет доступа Меня взломали и заскамили и чел написал об этом напрямую Теперь он просит бабки за пароль Я без телефона Мне ждать ответа от эпл неделю 1%, что мне восстановят телефон Если чуда не произойдет, то это будет просто неработающий кирпич Все мои данные, заметки и 35000 фото утеряны безвозвратно Я просто в лютом ахуе😭 Если бы вы знали, что мне пришлось пережить

custom 52426088200599081189

17 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC218 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

сосать хейтеры я не зря ходила в школу

2 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC326 viewsread 10 August 2026

крайний раз я испытывала такие же эмоции, когда закончился сериал половое воспитание как же много я выношу каких то уроков и осмыслений из кино это лучшая терапия, я вам клянусь у меня началась какая то дикая любовь к киноиндустрии, посмотрим чем это обернется кстати, последний сезон эйфории если честно хуйня полная да заложены смыслы, да крутые актеры и ещё куча да но объективно вообще не очень и ощущение, что чего

2 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC227 viewsread 10 August 2026

у меня заканчиваются отчаянные домохозяйки😭 этот сериал очень многое прожил со мной и теперь всегда у меня будет ассоциироваться с определенным периодом это было очень крутое, терапевтичное и классное время неважно что происходило и какое настроение у меня было они были всегда думаю каждый скучал по сериалу ну а теперь сопрано😮‍💨 пару раз начинала и откладывала, чую пора

24 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC262 viewsread 10 August 2026

буду рада, если вы лайкните мне новый пост в инсте я готова возвращаться начинаю по чуть чуть 🤏🏻 а вообще, жизнь от меня требует прям проявленность я это ощущаю как никогда раньше просто вечно это откладываю ничего не выкладываю почти, но просмотры сами набираются из неоткуда люди подписываются, предложения поступают я боюсь представить, что будет если вести соц сети регулярно.. ведь мне правда есть, что показать и

22 Jun 2026, 19:00 UTC237 viewsread 10 August 2026

ну и еще я второй день хожу в другой район, что бы хотя бы на 5 минут зайти в интернет нашла «мертвые души на полке» и поняла, что видимо пора

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zlatiks444. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 822,072 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zlatiks” (@zlatiks444), 119 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zlatiks444.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.