Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

От Скайуокера к Вейдеру

@zknklnv21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003986100326
TypeChannel
Username@zknklnv21
Created29 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zknklnv21

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:1612no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:2412first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.3%
avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held10 (29 May 202616 July 2026)
Views total13
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52808542711751867871020.0%
custom 5280830717574540048816.0%
custom 5278387070161672390714.0%
custom 5280599489420220643612.0%
custom 5280544672752626141510.0%
custom 5280669832394598147510.0%
custom 5280843769980148846510.0%
custom 528085346801630442148.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zknklnv21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Световой меч Люка Скайуокера ушёл с молотка за рекордные 3,75 млн долларов. Вместе с ним покупатель получил бутафорскую руку, которую герою отрубили в фильме «Империя наносит ответный удар». @fintex

10 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC41 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Натали Портман Сыграла один из самых знаменитых ролей в своей карьере. Когда она играла Падме Амидалу в трилогии приквелов «Звёздных войн», её возраст был примерно таким: Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace — съёмки проходили в 1997–1998 годах. Натали было 16–17 лет. Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones — съёмки проходили в 2000–2001 годах. Натали было 19–20 лет. Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the

custom 52805994894202206433custom 52783870701616723902custom 52805446727526261412custom 52808307175745400482custom 52808534680163044212custom 52808542711751867872

10 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC39 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Для Меня Звёздные войны: Эпизод III — Месть ситхов — самый эмоциональный фильм всей саги. Он вызывает сразу несколько сильных чувств: Трагедия — ты знаешь, что Энакин станет Дартом Вейдером, но всё равно больно смотреть, как он постепенно теряет себя. Грусть — отношения Энакина и Падме рушатся, гибнут джедаи, заканчивается целая эпоха. Шок — Приказ 66 и уничтожение Ордена джедаев до сих пор считаются одними из самы

custom 52808437699801488464custom 52808307175745400483custom 52808542711751867873custom 52783870701616723901custom 52805446727526261411custom 52805994894202206431custom 52806698323945981471

6 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC43 views14 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я скучаю по старому Питеру из 2016-года. Он буквально моя копия смотрит много фильмов нету никакой серьёзной проблемы в жизни. И я не замечал что в сцене драки он упомянул про «Звёздные Войны Империя наносит ответный удар»

custom 52808542711751867874custom 52806698323945981473custom 52808307175745400482custom 52783870701616723901custom 52805446727526261411custom 52805994894202206431custom 52808437699801488461custom 52808534680163044211

5 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC40 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Мой мир и канал посвященный только этому шедевру 🪽

custom 52783870701616723903custom 52805446727526261411custom 52805994894202206431custom 52806698323945981471custom 52808307175745400481custom 52808534680163044211custom 52808542711751867871

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zknklnv21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“От Скайуокера к Вейдеру” (@zknklnv21), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zknklnv21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.