Channel
@ziyi889988
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
958subscribers
+656 since we began measuring on 23 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003946261335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ziyi889988 |
| Created | 23 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 23 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ziyi889988 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 958 | -64 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 1,022 | +519 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 503 | +201 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 302 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 23 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (23 October 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,398 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
上海艺术展览会报告模板： https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 【体验评分】：满分推荐 【人照几成】：9成 【验证留名】：一对手 【验证时间】：10月23日 【妹子艺名】：子怡 【联系方式】：@ziyi88998 【上课水费】：14P 【位置环境】：闵行区 【罩杯手感】：C罩杯 【身材描述】：前凸后翘 【服务类型】：课表一致 【服务态度】：善解人意 【屌感紧度】：滑 多水 【个人总结】：首先人照对版，担心照骗的可以直接不需要担心，颜值超级好看邻家姐姐的感觉，看了很有欲望的类型，服务态度好，口技好，日感很好，反馈真实，会下腰，属于上品嫩御，真的很欲，虽然我迟到了，但是老师仍然态度满分，从头到脚服务了一遍，亲身体验之后无比舒畅，今晚回去睡个好觉，非常Nice。 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考 请理性选择 注：提交报告 @Yszbgbot 注：提交报告时需要约课证明
上海艺术展览会报告模板： https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 【体验评分】：95 【人照几成】：一致 【验证留名】：抱憾 【验证时间】：10-23 【妹子艺名】：#子怡 【联系方式】：@ziyi88998 【上课水费】：#1400p 【位置环境】：#闵行区 【罩杯手感】：天然C 【身材描述】：S型 【服务类型】：吹箫 鸳鸯 舌吻 【服务态度】：温柔 【屌感紧度】：有水声 【个人总结】：果然台湾小姐姐很温柔，也很热情，样子耐看，身材性感，穿着黑丝，瞬间就硬了，不得不说环境很好，老师非常注重卫生，可以说是出击这么多次最干净的房间，性格好好，服务超级棒，太主动了，声音也很好听，皮肤像水一样，很滑。老师体质很敏感，且淫水超多，被插了几下小穴就变得非常湿润…可以很清楚地听到 噗嗤~噗嗤 的水声，还有 啪~啪 的屁股撞击声！听着她的声音越来越高，知道顶多两分钟的事，就交枪了，舒服～ 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考 …
🎰 白嫖劵闵行台妹【子怡】@ziyi88998 📮 参与条件 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会备用群 🎫 加入-🌈子怡的家人们 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会总榜单 🎫 加入-上海艺术展（中转平台） 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会报告区2.0 🎁 奖品名单 💰️ 白嫖劵p × 1 📜 抽奖说明 中奖者截图发给管理审核 @yishuja_bot 开奖后8天内完成出击 如特殊情况可延后 优惠劵获得者出击后必须写报告完不成请勿报名（近期没有上课意向的狼友 请勿参与 不去联系管理报备说明原因） ‼️报告要求 不能三言两语的敷衍，体验情况要写明 ‼️禁止转让私下交易（如发现全网封杀） ‼️ 本次抽奖归属权为本平台 点击查看【子怡】个人资料：⬇️ https://t.me/yishuzhanlanhui/36072 📆 开奖时间 …
👍👍👍【艺术展览会福利群】⬇️ 免费拿5折6折7折优惠 和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包🧧福利 本群专属手势认证高质量老师 上海艺术展览会福利群： https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群 上海艺术展览会总榜单：https://t.me/+Bc16na5DQI82MDli 上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1 上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+jzWwy36Lm1M0MGEx 展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu 个人推荐频道88🧧 📡 上榜管理：@yishuja_bot 📡 管理秘书：@Yishujia798_bot 📡 投稿报告：@Yszbgbot
🎉 本次抽奖由 如果你也听说 发起 🆔 抽奖ID: 968 📢 抽奖信息: 闵行新人【子怡】老师福利抽奖 1、资料 https://t.me/jiangnanlu1/24999?single 2、中奖后四天内（看清楚时间）使用，若老师休息则顺延，过期作废！ 3、请注意开奖时间，以下方式查询： 2️⃣关注频道 @yujiehcoujiang ； 3️⃣给 @yujie_lottery_bot 发个消息，中奖会通知。 4、转让规则：中奖者没办法去的私聊退给我，不允许私下转让。 5、与老师其他优惠不叠加使用（如有），开奖后两日内私聊老师领取红包（如有）。 🎁 奖品内容: ⤷ @ziyi88998 子怡 优惠300（11p19pp） × 3 📌 频道/群组要求: ⤷ 🌈子怡的家人们 ⤷ 江南风情录 ⤷ 江南录老师开课群 🎯 抽奖要求: ⤷ 50 天内发言 1 条 ⤷ 90 天内反馈 1 条 二者满足其一即可参与抽奖…
Photo, posted without a caption
艺名:子怡（台湾人） 完美炮架🌈，人比照片好看 ， • 𝗔𝗴𝗲：年龄/04 •𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：身高/163 • 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：体重/90 • 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭胸围：真实/c • 𝐎𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧：职业/兼职 反差感，你的专属女友🧚🏻♂️，为你私人定制，温柔知性，谈吐优雅从容，期待展现完美的自己。 三点粉🌸，粉嫩的蜜桃臀🍑 有趣的灵魂与美丽的肉体共存 可淡妆素颜见面可制服/情趣💫 身体健康，每个月提供体检报告📄 服务积极认真 懂得聊天不冷场🙋♀️ 💰课时费 .1400p 45min .2200pp 80min .不外不✌️ 📃课程内容： 鸳鸯戏水 吹潇 环遊 🐍😘 6️⃣9️⃣ 调晴 资势百变 深喉咙 可叫爸爸老公等等 放的开 ❤️温柔热情 ❤️气质优雅 ❤️交流幽默 ❤️皮肤白皙 ❤️蜜桃臀 马甲线 🌈注意事项 没有隐藏服务项目 🈲酒后 🈲桩机 🈲后花园🈲 WT 双向联系： @ziyizhuangshu_bot
❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ziyi889988. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌈子怡的家人们” (@ziyi889988), 958 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziyi889988.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.