4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,071–3,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:17
3,073
-8
9 Aug 2026, 13:01
3,081
-4
6 Aug 2026, 21:41
3,085
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:31
3,085
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 24 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
319 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
186
58.3%
👍
68
21.3%
🔥
54
16.9%
😢
7
2.19%
🐳
3
0.94%
😱
1
0.313%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 4 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تغییرات مهم کنکور سراسری از سال آینده!
۱.ترمیم نمره تکدرس حذف شد!
دیگر نمیتوانید فقط یک یا دو درس را ترمیم کنید! اگر قصد ترمیم دارید، باید همه دروس نهایی را دوباره امتحان دهید، حتی اگر در برخی از آنها ۲۰ گرفته باشید!
۲.نمره نهایی، همان نمره ترمیمی خواهد بود!
دیگر خبری از انتخاب نمره بالاتر نیست! هر نمرهای که در آزمون ترمیمی بگیرید، همان ثبت میشود!
۳.فقط یک کنکور در سال!
از سال آینده، فرصت دوبارهای در کار ن…
*شرکت در کنکور اردیبهشت، دقیقاً همون سلاحیه که کنکور تیر رو واست آسونتر میکنه. یهبار فضای واقعیو تجربه میکنی، قلق امتحان دستت میاد و استرست میریزه!*
آزمون اردیبهشت مثل یه پیشنمایشه؛ هر اشتباهی اینجا بکنی بهتر از اینه که بار اول روز کنکور میخکوب بشی ، پس با حضورت، خودت رو آماده میکنی تا اون روز بزرگ راحتتر و با اعتماد بهنفس بیشتری بشینی سر جلسه و نتیجه واقعی خودتو نشون بدی.
*هرکسی که کنکور آزمایشی رو جدی بگ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zist_bom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آزمون های آزمایشی | ماز | دوپینگ ماز | قلمچی | خیلی سبز @konkurbanks · 165,892 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
مدرسه آنلاین آلفا @alphaedu · 128,731 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💣زیست بووم💣” (@zist_bom), 3,073 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zist_bom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.