Channel
@zippfeed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,448subscribers
-9,123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003717924131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zippfeed |
| Description | Crypto news, zipped. 👀 The fastest way to stay on top of what’s moving in crypto! From news and on-chain data to regulation and shipping projects.. Visit Website: https://zippfeed.com Follow on X: https://x.com/zippfeed |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 41 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zippfeed |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 7,448 | -7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:30 | 7,455 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:37 | 7,463 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 7,476 | -56 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 7,532 | -33 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 7,565 | -43 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 7,608 | -59 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 7,667 | -44 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 7,711 | -131 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:14 | 7,842 | -137 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 7,979 | -562 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 8,541 | -282 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 8,823 | -313 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 9,136 | -131 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 9,267 | -204 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 9,471 | -251 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 9,722 | -133 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 9,855 | -94 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 9,949 | -87 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 10,036 | first reading |
1,047 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,047 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,384 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 367 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥 BULLISH Binance Covers All Assets Hit by $6.3B Hack Binance says it has finished covering ALL user assets hit by the $6.3B hack, one of the largest security incidents in crypto history, now fully resolved for affected users. 🔒 The announcement comes with a new Proof of Reserves snapshot backed by a ZK proof, so users can independently verify their balances are backed 1:1 rather than trusting a corporate statemen…
🩸 BEARISH Bitcoin sinks to $71K as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigns 📉 Bitcoin fell to a 12-week low of $71,200 as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's abrupt resignation rattled risk markets. BTC was down 3.4% to $71,600, with Ethereum, Solana and XRP each dropping more than 3.5%. More than $750M in crypto positions were liquidated in 24 hours, including $634M in longs, per CoinGlass. Huang stepped down Thursday morning as N…
🩸 BEARISH BTC Breaks Below $72K as Nvidia Turmoil Hits Risk Appetite 📉 Bitcoin has broken below $72,000 and lost the 200-day moving average, down about 18% from its swing high. The cited culprits: Nvidia turmoil crushing risk appetite and serious Fed warnings. Ethereum is uglier. Roughly 28% off its swing high and six straight red weekly candles. Its extreme Fibonacci band is being tested now: 0.618 around $2,000,…
🔥 BULLISH EXOD jumps 8% as StoneX backs $12 target on cost reset 📈 Exodus shares jumped over 8% to $4.68 after StoneX kept its Buy rating and $12 price target, implying roughly 150% more upside. The thesis: "The cost reset is real," per analyst Mark Palmer. Q3 revenue hit $32.5M, beating estimates of $29M-$31M, and the adjusted EBITDA loss shrank to $3.9M from $6.7M. 💳 Payments pulled in nearly $11M in their firs…
🔥 BULLISH US stocks add $1 trillion in two-hour intraday reversal US stocks just staged one of the sharpest intraday reversals of the year: over $1 TRILLION in market capitalization added in roughly two hours 📈 That speed matters. Moves like this usually mean forced selling has run dry and buyers returned all at once, turning a risk-off session into a broad risk-on close. The tone shift ripples beyond equities. E…
🔥 BULLISH Binance Covers 100% of Losses in $6.3B North Korea Hack ⚖ Binance says it has now covered 100% of losses from the $6.3B crypto hack attributed to North Korea. Every affected user has been made whole. 🔒 This is the part of the story the industry will read closely. State-sponsored groups like Lazarus have drained billions from crypto over the years, and after every major breach the question is the same: wh…
🔥 BULLISH Nvidia Staff Back Jensen Huang: 88% Want Him to Stay CEO 88% of Nvidia employees surveyed want Jensen Huang to stay CEO. That is a near-unanimous internal vote of confidence in the company's co-founder, who has led $NVDA since 1993. 🏛 Founder-led continuity is rare in tech, and Nvidia's AI chip dominance is closely tied to Huang's hands-on management style and direct engagement across the org. 📊 The con…
🩸 BEARISH Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang exits with no future role 📉 Jensen Huang is out of Nvidia entirely, and he will hold no role at the company going forward. This is the co-founder and CEO who built Nvidia from a 1993 graphics startup into the dominant supplier of AI training compute, and he has been the single most important figure in the AI trade's biggest winner. 🏛 Few mega-cap companies are this identified wit…
🩸 BEARISH Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Resigns as DOJ Launches Investigation ⚖ The US Justice Department has launched an investigation into Nvidia following CEO Jensen Huang's resignation. 🏛 The timing puts two risks in focus: continuity of leadership and regulatory scrutiny involving a company central to the AI-chip trade. 📉 Huang's exit leaves questions over management succession and strategic direction, while the D…
🩸 BEARISH Nvidia still owes Congress answers, Sen. Warren says after exit Sen. Elizabeth Warren says Nvidia still owes Congress an explanation despite CEO Jensen Huang's resignation. The leadership change does not close the congressional oversight issue. ⚖ 🏛 Warren's position targets the accountability attached to Nvidia's AI role, not just the person at the top. For $NVDA investors, governance and AI-policy risk …
🩸 BEARISH US House Speaker backs chip export curbs on China ⚖ US House Speaker Mike Johnson says he supports restricting chip exports to China, putting the Speaker's office squarely behind Washington's toughest technology policy lever. 🏛 The endorsement matters because export controls need durable political backing to hold. Advanced chips sit at the center of the US-China AI race, and a statement from the top of t…
🔥 BULLISH Crypto Industry Challenges Illinois 0.2% Transaction Tax ⚖ An amicus brief filed by 18 crypto companies and organizations argues that Illinois' proposed 0.2% crypto transaction tax is discriminatory, vague and effectively impossible for some targeted entities to comply with. 🏛 The law applies to crypto businesses with receipts above $100,000, but its definitions leave firms unsure who qualifies as a brok…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,047 posts we hold for @zippfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zipp 👀” (@zippfeed), 7,448 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zippfeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.