Работа сервиса восстановлена.
👍2

Channel
@zino4ka_info
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,257subscribers
-57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002114534881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zino4ka_info |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zino4ka_info |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 3,257 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 3,262 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 3,268 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 3,276 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 3,278 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 3,285 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 3,291 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 3,297 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 3,298 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 3,302 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 3,304 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 3,313 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 3,314 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 3,314 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
48 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 41.7% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Работа сервиса восстановлена.
👍2
Друзья, всем привет. Наблюдаются сбои при формировании файлов, разбираемся, устраним в ближайшее время, по результатам сообщим.
👍2
Друзья, а вы знали почему предприниматели и бухгалтера не любят апрель? Ответ на скриншоте😆 Мы и наши клиенты успешно раскидались. Теперь можно спокойно шашлычков покушать. Всех с наступающими праздниками, хороших выходных!🤝
Зачем бизнесу прыгать по разным программам, если все сводится к одномуС? Обычно развитие учёта выглядит так: 1. Сначала Excel; 2. Потом МойСклад или аналоги; 3. А когда бизнес вырастает - болезненный переезд на 1С; Каждый такой переход - это стресс. - Нужно переносить остатки; - Переучиваться самому и сотрудникам; - Терять ценную историю операций, время и деньги; И вот блин самое интересное. По моему опыту, бол…
❤1👍1
А вы где ведете учет?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кстати, вы знали, что OZON и Авито ведут весь учет в 1С? 😳 Да, сам Ozon - это сложнейшая кастомная IT-система. Но когда дело доходит до финансов, налогов и международной отчетности, в игру вступает старая добрая 1С. Ozon даже проводит профильные митапы для 1С-разработчиков! Он прошел на днях, запись доступна по ССЫЛКЕ. И вот что важно: большинство успешных селлеров строят свой бизнес по той же логике. Почему именн…
Недавно пишет клиент: «Виталий, хочу сайт - разработчики просят 350К и минимум три месяца. Это адекватная цена?» А у него уже стоит 1С УНФ, потому что через меня покупал, не зря он доверился. За час собираю ему рабочий магазин - с учётом, остатками, приёмом заказов. Без единой строчки кода. Без сторонних интеграций. Без разработчика, и кучи всяких брифов - из разряда «Полку приклеить, или прибить». В новом ролике п…
👍5🔥4👏1
Друзья, всем привет. Кто давно хотел начать ютуб канал, сейчас самое время, и вот почему. На днях ютубчик выкатил мощнейшую обнову, а именно нейроассистент внутри творческой студии, он сам помогает придумать название и рисует обложку, и это все на столько хорошо, что поражает, дизайнеры по обложка похоже в ближайшее время будут не востребованы. При чем превью можно корректировать, пишешь ему и он все послушно убирае…
👍2🔥2❤1❤🔥1
⏳ До 25 апреля ИП должны сдать декларацию за 2025 год. В этом году крайний срок - 27 апреля, так как 25-е выпадает на выходной. ⚠️ Момент, о котором многие забывают: если вы на патенте и не писали заявление об отказе от УСН - обязаны подать нулёвку. Не подали - штраф плюс риск блокировки счёта. Каждый год находятся те, кто «не знал». Чтобы не тратить время на ручное заполнение, я сделал сервис, который помогает под…
🔥5❤1
Друзья, доброго дня. Отличных вам продаж 🤝💪 По просьбам наших подписчиков добавили старую функцию из бота, уникализация ID в объявлениях. Пользуйтесь во благо, если будут пожелания - пишите в поддержку @desk_bench Ссылка на сервис - Зиночка 2.0
👍3🔥2👀1
Друзья, всем привет. В поддержку перестали поступать обращения. У всех все работает, вопросов нет? Поделитесь вашим опытом, как все работает у вас?
Друзья, всем привет. Как вам такое, если мы будем общаться в поддержке в стиле викингов? Ах, не терзать лицевые щиты пользователей горами рун технической мудрости! 🛡️📜 Пусть вместо сражения с цифрами, мы дарим им лёгкость, словно ветер с крыльев Фенрира! 🌬️⚔️ Или А не мучать ли нам пользователей горами технической пыли? 🍃 Как в древнем притче, когда ученик просит у мастера океан в ладони, а мастер лишь показывает …
🔥3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zino4ka_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы где ведете учет?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 29 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗИНОЧКА Avito” (@zino4ka_info), 3,257 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zino4ka_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.