Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Жуконатор

Channel

The Жуконатор

@zhukonator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,051subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772004730
TypeChannel
Username@zhukonator
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhukonator

Growth

1,0511,0601,055.57 August 2026 — 1,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,060 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,050–1,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 23:371,051-1
24 Aug 2026, 09:421,052-3
20 Aug 2026, 23:051,055-3
11 Aug 2026, 04:211,058-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:031,060no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:181,060first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,089 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥62157.0%
custom 527598644543619787518917.4%
👍15914.6%
👏12011.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,089reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhukonator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2025 to 2 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Dec 2025, 13:13 UTC≈1,410 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Делаю себе в ИИ директора по маркетингу. Вот он, в роли жёсткого критика оффера, помогает докручивать смысл того, что продаём. Мозг переворачивает капитально. Это памятка всем, кто делает блоги, продаёт курсы и вообще ставку на контент как на ценность делает. 100% правда! — Жуконатор | #инсайт@zhukonator

🔥53👍24👏16

30 Nov 2025, 08:01 UTC≈1,300 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я тормоз. Анонимный опрос показал, что почти 80% не пользуются этим гениальным изобретением. Почему я тормоз? У меня в руках шикарный продукт, а я не делюсь им. Смотри. Это лучшая ИИ машина для обучения. Лучше пока я не нашёл. Здесь нет галюцинаций, нет лишнего тупняка, огромная память (в 10 раз больше чем у ChatGPT) и главное... она работает ТОЛЬКО с теми материалами, которые ты в неё загружаешь. Внедряй... Note

🔥37custom 527598644543619787513👍11

20 Nov 2025, 12:24 UTC≈1,120 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итак, ты спрашиваешь у ИИ: "Подскажи мне, как решить проблему Х"? Он тебе отвечает. Ты доволен. Только так оно не работает. Контекст всегда подстраивается под тебя. ВСЕГДА. Замечал, как ИИ тебя вечно хвалит? Это в прошивке. Но тебе не нужен "кивала", тебе нужен тот, кто помогает найти решение. Настоящая ценность ИИ - когда он бьёт по твоим слепым зонам. Сделал задачу. Кажется всё идеально? Закинь промпт: "Ка

🔥42👍16custom 52759864454361978757

12 Nov 2025, 10:44 UTC903 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Пссс... пользуешься NotebookLM?

  1. 😎 Да, инструмент огонь!21%
  2. 😳 Что за зверь такой?79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Nov 2025, 10:36 UTC951 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зачем платить по $200+ за ИИ? Стоит-ли оно того? Ты в курсе, что есть "продвинутые" модели ChatGPT или Gemini, которые стоят $200 в месяц? Не $20... я не ошибся... Именно $200 Это heavy thinking ИИ, который не просто отвечает на твой запрос, а очень глубоко его анализирует. Ты спрашиваешь его "Будет ли выгодной сделка, если я вложу $1000 в рекламу" и знаешь что он делает? Он начинает твой запрос разбивать на под

🔥27👏17

28 Oct 2025, 08:55 UTC862 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Три вопроса, которые ты ОБЯЗАН задавать ИИ, когда задача решена (обязательно в том же окне, где был диалог). Просмотри диалог и весь его контекст ещё раз. Какие закономерности ты видишь в моём мышлении? В каких моментах я постоянно застреваю? Какие мыслительные/ментальные привычки помогают мне, а какие вредят? Это не терапия. Это хирургия мышления. Каждый раз, когда я запускаю этот промпт, он вскрывает то, что я п

🔥41👍14custom 52759864454361978759

26 Oct 2025, 12:29 UTC703 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему ИИ порет чушь? Держи правду, которую не понимают 99%. ИИ не волшебная таблетка (извини, если разочаровал). Оно выпуклое зеркало твоих мыслей. Не получаешь нужный ответ? Проблема не в нейронке. Проблема в голове. В вопросе. Мутный вопрос = мутный результат. Задал вопрос и получил чушь? Сам виноват. Главный принцип вот в чём. ИИ не думает за тебя. Он либо показывает, где ты облажался, либо усиливает точнос

🔥28👍9👏5

24 Oct 2025, 11:25 UTC772 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пора выключить блеяние в хоре однотипных постов. Давай уже... врубай свой соляк! Ты тоже заметил адово выжженое поле контента. Читаю каналы по ИИ и... понятия не имею что они пишут. Новости, хайп, "волшебные таблетки". Тотальный бессмысленный поток кликбейта с раздуванием ЧСВ автора и FOMO читателей. Потом люди удивляются "какого ж хрена у них не читают и не покупают"? Ты тоже думаешь, что пишешь что-то классное?

🔥40👍7custom 52759864454361978754

29 Sept 2025, 17:07 UTC990 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Исследователи и аналитики рынков могут паковать чемоданы. Пришёл их жнец. Жнец их скорби и хлеба. Платформа, которая делает глубочайшие исследования. Выбирай Deep Research 8x и вперёд. Ссылка — https://platform.parallel.ai А теперь вопрос к тебе. Да-да. Ты читаешь эту строку. Я исследованиями с глубоким погружением занимаюсь 15 лет. Мой девиз был всегда "Сначала точи топор, потом руби". Но... я никогда не вид

🔥91👏11custom 527598644543619787510👍1

24 Sept 2025, 15:38 UTC≈1,240 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Жаль программистов. Искренне. Сам был среди когорты этих светлых людей. Вчера срочно понадобилось написать скрипт калькулятора для проекта по ЖКТ для женщин. Обычный лидмагнит для расчёта параметров. Раньше это занимало 3-5 дней: 1. Техзадание 2. Найти фрилансера 3. Объяснить задание 4. Выругаться на результат 5. Отправить правки 6. Получить то, что нужно 7. Вставить на сайт Стоило это тысяч 5-10 в зависимости

🔥29custom 527598644543619787516👏10

21 Sept 2025, 17:33 UTC≈1,010 views79 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

Пока ты ищешь "узкую специализацию", твои конкуренты зарабатывают миллионы. Знаешь, что их отличает? Они забили на ниши. И сделали ставку на то, что нереально (во всяком случае пока) скопировать. Я уже писал о том, что ИИ убьёт 90% экспертов за завтраком. Но не тебя. Если поймёшь одну простую истину. Люди покупают не знания. Они покупают того, кто эти знания даёт. Твою боль, твои шрамы, твой взгляд на мир. Самая

🔥53custom 527598644543619787515👏7👍4

16 Sept 2025, 17:32 UTC≈1,010 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ИИ написал мне 10 страниц бреда, я налепил в название "Мои 5 шагов от бомжа до олигарха", продал за 30к рублей и... бууум стал триллионером. Интересно? Пиши в ЛС... тебя тоже разведу. --- Шучу. Но, на глаз, половина "EXпертов", которые влились в нейротемки, именно так и делает в своих каналах. Но. Если отбросить явных скамеров, то вторая половина впадает в другую крайность. Они хотят от ИИ волшебную кнопку "бабл

🔥30👍7👏5custom 52759864454361978753

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhukonator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Nov 2025, 10:44 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Пссс... пользуешься NotebookLM?

  1. 😎 Да, инструмент огонь!21%
  2. 😳 Что за зверь такой?79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 2 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 708,941 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,483
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Зубастый маркетолог
@marketolog_digital · 49,262
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,778
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Жуконатор” (@zhukonator), 1,051 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhukonator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.