Channel
@zhu1ik_stars
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
172subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002394142873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhu1ik_stars |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhu1ik_stars |
@zhu1ik_stars was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 172 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 173 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 177 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 178 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 179 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 179 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 28 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
разбор данной личности, как ecstasy⁶⁶⁶ - @Qr1wt (малолетняя девочка, которая скамит людей) информация: полина черных- день рождения 11.04.2015 год +380662277992( номер на котором она сидит с аккаунта, зареган на бабку) елена черных (ее бабка) карта бабки 2202208210101813 на эту карту она принимает оплату, а так же ей пользуется, абы своей нет(ей нет 14 лет, детской карты так же нету) человек написал ей с целью купить…
❤1
На самом деле не копейки возврата
Вот я ему вернула
Если она вам пишет что вернула мне что то, не ведитесь, дурочка создала мой фейк аккаунт и делает вид что вернула
За крутые рассылы буду давать подарки, пишите в коменты
Хотелось бы рассказать о такой личности как @Qr1wt вот ее канал https://t.me/lllllvcfdddx Данная личность продавала свой канал, я заинтересовался решил купить, написал, обговорили цену в 3 нфт подарка, я скинул подарки после чего улетаю в игнор, вижу как она выкладывает истории и подписывает что купила нфт😂😂 После чего пишет мне что передумала такую цену и просит 3000 рублей, на что я отказался и попросил вернуть …
❤1😇1
.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed цвбувкв.кириноу
канал в комм минутк
Signed цвбувкв.кириноу
Результаты конкурса: Победитель: 1. 𝑘𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑥𝑥𝑥🪽 (@kseeenixxx) Проверить результаты
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
мгновенка
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
рр
Signed цвбувкв.кириноу
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zhu1ik_stars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zhu1ik_stars named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“звезды от жулика ️” (@zhu1ik_stars), 172 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhu1ik_stars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.