Channel
@zhonglichun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101092122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @zhonglichun @zixia |
| Created | 14 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhonglichun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 5 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 6 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 5 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 14 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
@zhangjie 张杰 @linjunjie 林俊杰 @renwoxing 任我行 @baoluowoke 保罗沃克 @wangxizhi 王羲之 @matianyu 马天宇 @linziyi 林子怡 @diqing 战神狄青 @yiwanka 伊万卡 @telangpu 特朗普 @baoweier 鲍威尔 @zhuyin 朱茵 @lijiaqi 李嘉琪 @sunbin 孙膑 @zixia 紫霞 @aobai 鳌拜 @gaojin 高进
https://fragment.com/username/zixia
高净值用户名商店💜 💕 @Yibao 便捷按钮(点击蓝色文字) 💥租赁用户名 💕购买用户名 列表1 列表2 列表3 列表4 💜用户名竞标 🆘信息和帮助 业主归@Grape所有 🔤🌹🔤🔤🔤
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @zhonglichun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 551,721 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zhonglichun named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“紫霞/钟离春 待售” (@zhonglichun), 5 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhonglichun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.