Photo, posted without a caption
🤣4

Channel
@zhizha_prokrastinator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002166564623 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhizha_prokrastinator |
| Description | Канал создан в первую очередь чисто для себя, а там уж посмотрим) А это я - @Egorchik23 |
| Created | 5 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhizha_prokrastinator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 13 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
37 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 45.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 21.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 18.9% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣4
Гайдик! 😋 Решил все таки сегодня заняться проблемой того что устал все оплачивать и покупать через сторонние площадки (тот же spotify и claude). И еще пару месяцев назад хотел по видосу TradeParty сделать карту, но там были проблемы и не мало, я все никак не мог найти нормальный номер kz и удалить на своем основном акке подтверждение проживания (а это очень критично), часы тратил на поддержку - как итог отменить они…
🔥5🐳1
не густо получилось(
❤1
Второй дроп ZRO получился больше первого! Всё это из-за цены токена, а так же из-за количества, ведь раздали практически как за первый дроп. У меня прошли те же акки, что и под первый дроп. Получается не зря делал jumper (некоторые транзы шли как раз таки через layer zero)
❤3
https://eligibility.layer3foundation.org/
Бычка отменяется, теперь я тут
🔥3
Появилась возможность открыть сундуки за первую фазу. Я вот даже вайтлист выбил
Это основа остальные по ~50
👍2
Пост о моих "движениях". 1) После такой раздачи от zk, стоит подготовить свои Scroll акки более качественно (как минимум залить в Kelp ETH + у них так же нет токена). Сам я буду стейкать по 0.1 Eth в Kelp и держать как можно больше баланса на кошельках (при этом будут активно фармиться марки) 2) Как оказалось на днях Layer3 привлекли целых $15М. Суммарно Layer3 собрал $21М. Так что получается гем. Сейчас идёт Airdr…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
давно пора... (надеюсь не квесты)
Сегодня расскажу про суперлёгкую активность в проекте под названием Tabi. Решил написать именно про этот проект, так как сама активность в нём не требует затрат (так же есть с небольшими вложениями) и проходится очень быстро. Бегло о проекте - Tabi это блокчейн построенный на cosmos, который полностью совместим с EVM сетями. Собрали 11м (Binance labs, Animoca Brands присутствуют). Сам чейн по большей степени будет св…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zhizha_prokrastinator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zhizha” (@zhizha_prokrastinator), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhizha_prokrastinator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.