Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 知乎每日精選

Channel

知乎每日精選

@zhihu_tele

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

983subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444013974
TypeChannel
Username@zhihu_tele
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhihu_tele

Growth

9839899866 August 2026 — 989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 989 subscribers15 August 2026 — 988 subscribers22 August 2026 — 983 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 982–990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 18:24983-5
15 Aug 2026, 03:16988-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:56989no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:47989first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈8,910 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 为什么现在航天员去太空都是三人一组,而不是两人一组或四人一组? | Telegraph | 原文

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈5,940 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 足球比赛中跑动最少的守门员为什么经常需要喝水? | Telegraph | 原文

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈7,560 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 为什么《疯狂动物城》里的狐狸尼克会让人觉得帅? | Telegraph | 原文

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 肿瘤标记物正常能说明没有早期癌症吗? | Telegraph | 原文

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈4,680 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 猫为什么喜欢把东西推下去? | Telegraph | 原文

27 Apr 2022, 01:20 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 瞎扯 · 如何正确地吐槽 | Telegraph | 原文

26 Apr 2022, 02:15 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 为什么说博尔特的 200 米纪录比 100 米纪录更惊世骇俗? | Telegraph | 原文

26 Apr 2022, 02:14 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 如何评价《亲爱的小孩》大结局? | Telegraph | 原文

26 Apr 2022, 02:14 UTC879 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 新手购车,配置应该怎么选? | Telegraph | 原文

26 Apr 2022, 02:14 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 为什么大熊猫有的更像熊,有的更像猫? | Telegraph | 原文

26 Apr 2022, 02:14 UTC682 viewsread 6 August 2026

知乎日报 瞎扯 · 如何正确地吐槽 | Telegraph | 原文

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhihu_tele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“知乎每日精選” (@zhihu_tele), 983 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhihu_tele.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.