Channel
@zhenshina_tancyet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002991309500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhenshina_tancyet |
| Description | В 35 ягодка опять Как развестись и наконец-то начать жить. Работа на завтрак, ипотека на обед, танцы на ночь. Если хочешь поговорить: @marukarimova |
| Created | 17 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhenshina_tancyet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 31 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
275 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 86 | 31.3% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 19.6% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 13.8% | |
| 🍓 | 26 | 9.45% | |
| 💔 | 23 | 8.36% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 6.55% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.55% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.727% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Танцы на стеклах 6 июня прошел наш первый творческий показ перед зрителями. Хочу вам показать свой сольный номер. Этот танец - мое исцеление. Этот танец - моя свобода. Этот танец - моя новая дорога. Я отпустила прошлое, теперь я не хожу по стеклу. Спасибо моему хореографу @natali_miedo Спасибо моим богиням и зрителям за поддержку.
❤🔥8💔5
МЫ Вчера я продюсировала съемку нашей танцевальной команды богинь. Не знаю, как описать словами то, что я чувствую. Но хочу сказать одно: #женщинаженщинеубежище Результаты съемки покажу чуть позже, а пока — бэкстейдж. Фотограф: @lizavetaprakhova Хореограф и наша верховная богиня: @nataliamiedo За видео спасибо: @lizavetaprakhova
❤10❤🔥8🔥1
Мой островок стабильности Пока все думают, что делать с блокировками и переживают за отключение интернета - я танцую. Именно танцы дают мне стабильность и спокойствие. Именно в танце ко мне приходят новые идеи и горят глаза. Именно в танце я ощущаю свою красоту. Именно в танце я могу сама на что-то повлиять. В это непростое время у нас сложилась творческая команда и сегодня хочу показать вам наш совместный танец.…
❤🔥7🍓4
Обратная сторона танцев.
💔9
3-х часовой МК по танцам Надо было запомнить всю связку и станцевать на камеру. Я конечно же вызвалась сниматься соло. Зачем упускать такую возможность. Стоит ли говорить, что на следующий день у меня все адски болело и было очень тяжело встать с кровати. 36 лет все таки. Но горжусь собой. Choreography: @natali_miedo @aidushkajr
🔥11❤🔥10⚡5👍2🤩1
Мы сегодня такую красоту сняли. Такое 14 февраля мне определенно очень нравится. Все благодаря @natali_miedo Я не понимаю, почему ты еще не зарабатываешь миллионы?
❤🔥9🔥8
Валентинки 🖤
❤7🔥2
Первый наш дуэт Ко дню всех влюбленных 🖤 Одна хореография, 2 разные партнерши. Какое видео вам больше понравилось? 1 или 2? Надеюсь оно загрузится… Choreography: @natali_miedo
🔥8❤🔥4🤩4
Красивое сегодня
❤10🍓5
И кто вы думаете посмотрел мои сторис самый первый? Бывший муж 😂
🔥8🤣7
💋Мой бурлеск Как всегда волнуюсь, когда выкладываю видео. Не узнаю себя, это правда я? Спасибо моему тренеру @nataliamiedo
❤🔥13🍓7⚡4
Блеск бурлеск Вчера были съемки танца. В такие минуты забываешь о всех проблемах. Просто хочется купить красивое платье, сделать мейк, прическу и станцевать. Это вообще отдельное наслаждение учить хореографию, подбирать образ, переживать перед выступлением. У нас свой стрипушный чат, ох что вчера в нем творилось. За год мы все сдружились и это не просто хобби. Это уже танцевальная семья. Горжусь каждой. Уже скоро…
❤8❤🔥6💯3🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zhenshina_tancyet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 599,333 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zhenshina_tancyet named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Женщина, которая танцует” (@zhenshina_tancyet), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhenshina_tancyet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.