Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Женька Радость

@zhenkaradost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,889subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002917646528
TypeChannel
Username@zhenkaradost
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhenkaradost

Growth

1,8891,9051,8975 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,887–1,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:531,889-10
9 Aug 2026, 20:561,899-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:551,902-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:351,905no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:021,905first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 1,889 subscribers
Avg views / post
451
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held26 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,719
Reactions total430
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12449.2%
custom 54520787130027997508433.3%
🔥228.73%
🤩176.75%
😭31.19%
💔20.794%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC177 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Песня отдана на сведение!! Примерно к концу августа будет дроп) спасибо всем кто поддержал! +79221714443 тинькофф сейчас начинаются снова дождливые дни, которые являются для меня самыми тяжелыми в плане денег, поэтому каждый донат будет очень и очень к стати всех обнял!!

13custom 54520787130027997508

7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC371 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Первый комментатор ловит демку

5💔2custom 54520787130027997502

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC444 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шок бывшая заявилась в 1:40 ночи в кружке все видно….

🤩107custom 54520787130027997504

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC438 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5custom 54520787130027997503

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC476 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЛЁША ЛЕГЕНДА АХАХАХХАХАХАХ

10

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC432 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6😭1

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC459 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @neleshaalyoshaFile

File, posted without a caption

8

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC446 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @neleshaalyosha

Надеюсь Женька Радость будет заряжен на секс, я кое-что подготовил для вас. Досмотрите кружочек до конца ❤️

7

6 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC480 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а как с этим бороться - непонятно

4custom 54520787130027997501

6 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC475 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я сейчас вот прям жестко хочу баночку джастера и сигаретку вкусную….

🔥62custom 54520787130027997501

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC468 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

единственное, с чем мне осталось научиться справляться - это сиги и энергетики..

5custom 54520787130027997501

4 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC549 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

жди меня, я когда-нибудь выйду из комнаты жди меня, я приду этой осенью, кажется 🌟🧷

custom 5452078713002799750179🤩4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @zhenkaradost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 373,714 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женька Радость” (@zhenkaradost), 1,889 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhenkaradost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.