5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,446–3,455 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 18:48
3,452
-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:07
3,454
+5
9 Aug 2026, 15:13
3,449
+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:37
3,447
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:01
3,447
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 3,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
979
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
7 (17 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
5,871
Reactions total
385
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
466 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
205
44.0%
🔥
131
28.1%
❤🔥
87
18.7%
🤩
16
3.43%
🥰
11
2.36%
👍
7
1.50%
😍
7
1.50%
👏
1
0.215%
💯
1
0.215%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
UPD: запись на 9.08 закрыта ⌛
С Тинторетто открыли запись на все воркшопы августа, и уже в ближайшее воскресенье приглашаем на очередную рисовальную встречу, которую проведу в формате интенсива: будем по моим заданиям скетчить разными материалами, пробовать экспериментальные приемы, развивать абстрактное и включать внимание на процессе. Практика подойдёт для любого уровня; по желанию можно прихватить свой скетчбук, а…
UPD: запись закрыта ⌛Внезапно: коллаж! Приглашаю завтра на мою коллажную полянку в один из центральных парков Москвы, будем клеить композиции-оммажи: каждому участнику рандомно достанется свой референс с работой художника прошлого века
Не забудьте прихватить плед и защиту от солнца, обещают лето 🌞 Точная локация будет озвучена при записи в лс @zhekoro
🗓️: 1 августа 13:00-15:00
📍: в парке 🌿
✂️: 800.- (включены все м…
В прошлом году выполнил серию коллажей для обложек синглов для немецкого артиста mädmäx, а обложкой альбома был выбран один из моих ежедневных коллажей. И вот сегодня, наконец, состоялся его цифровой релиз, его можно послушать, например, на спотифай или эппл мьюзик. А для коллекционеров выпущен ограниченным тиражом на кассетах (просто вау!), заказать сложно, но можно тут
На следующие выходные приглашаем в Тинторетто насыщенно провести время за коллажными практиками 🤲🏻✨ Выбирайте удобный день и формат и заранее занимайте себе местечко в лс @zhekoro
⬇️ UPD: запись закрыта ⌛
🗓️: 25 июля 12:00-15:00
КОЛЛЕКТИВНЫЙ КОЛЛАЖ
Создаём все вместе в интенсивном потоке коллективные композиции по моим заданиям на разные приемы, темы и стили. Идеальный формат, чтобы снизить градус ответственности, о…
Июльские коллажи 182-197/365
В этом месяце закончил свой скетчбук, который вел с конца января, и начал новый, на этот раз захотелось вернуться к старому формату поменьше. В коллажах сейчас нравится работать со шрифтами, разбираю буквы на отдельные чёрточки и закругления и уже из этой мелочёвки собираю что-то новое
А ещё случайно продлил себе июнь: только на шестой день заметил, что на датере забыл сменить название ме…
🔥46❤34💯1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @zhe_koro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 67,740 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zhekoro” (@zhe_koro), 3,452 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhe_koro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.