Channel
@zhazhda_knig
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
428subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002408038014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhazhda_knig |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhazhda_knig |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 428 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 430 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 430 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
286 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 65 | 22.7% | |
| 🤣 | 60 | 21.0% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 10.8% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 2.80% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.45% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.699% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фредрик Бакман «Тревожные люди». Если в вашей жизни «полная попа”, прочтите эту книгу. Она заставит вас улыбнуться. Хоть и сквозь слезы.🤪 Добрая книга о чудесах, веры в которые нам взрослым порой так не хватает. В реальной жизни такой истории никогда бы не случилось. Но пусть хотя бы в книгах такое возможно. «Хэппи энды» я обычно не особо люблю, поскольку слишком уж они нереалистичны, но тут по-другому было нельзя. …
👍8❤5
Навела порядок на своей книжной полке🤗 Мечтаю о книжной комнате (хотя бы маааааленькой🤪😍). Делитесь в комментариях своими полочками, а мы за вас порадуемся🤗😉🫶 #книжныйюмор
🔥9🤣5❤4👍1
Как-то так🤷♀️🤣🤣🤣 #книжныйюмор
🤣16😁7🐳3👍1😱1
Надеюсь ваш вторник пройдет более радостно, чем у героя романа Жан-Поля Сартра «Тошнота»😉🤗😁
🤣13😁5🔥3👏2
Джером Клапка Джером «Трое в лодке, не считая собаки» - Книга, которую я не поняла. Извините, если задену чувства читающих🫣🤪🤗 Настроение было не очень. Любовных романов, чтоб до слез, не хотелось, разгадывать детективные загадки тоже, шевелить мозгами над Достоевским тем более, и листая список романов «на посмеяться», увидела эту книгу. Воспоминания о хвалебном отзыве и рекомендации а-ля «было смешно» моей подруги и…
👏5💯1
Лучше поздно, чем никогда))) Делюсь прочитанным еще на Новогодних каникулах🤪 Сара Даннаки «12 рождественских преступлений». Такой знаете уютный классическо-английский детективчик. Самое то, почитать на рождественских выходных. Сюжет и стиль повествования лично мне напомнили Агату Кристи. Компания, собранная по приглашению убитого год назад в Рождество Эдварда Лудденхэма, рассказывает истории, связанные с убийствами…
👍8🔥4😁3
Куда переходим?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3
😱Роскомнадзор начнет ограничение работы Telegram, утверждает РБК. Власти приняли решение начать работу по замедлению работы мессенджера Telegram в России, рассказали РБК источник в индустрии информационных технологий и два источника в профильных ведомствах. По их данным, РКН планирует начать принимать меры по частичному ограничению работы сервиса во вторник 10 февраля. Печальная новость, так мне было тут хорошо(((…
😭3❤2
Как выбираете, какую книгу прочесть следующей? Есть четкий порядок или по настроению? А может быть кидаете жребий? Делитесь интересными идеями, а я воспользуюсь🤗😁 ну если вам не жалко конечно😉😁🫶
😁6❤3
Вам письмо! Внутри — промокод для дополнительной скидки 10% на все наши книги на Ozon. 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 NAMIF10 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨
👍1
Вдруг у кого-то еще есть деньги и место и для новых книг😉
😁2
Как точно подмечено🤪😁 Как же трудно мне даются понедельники, просто за волосы себя тащу на работу🫣😁
💯18❤3🤣2🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zhazhda_knig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Куда переходим?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 767,655 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжная жажда” (@zhazhda_knig), 428 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhazhda_knig.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.