Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 36 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,641–11,692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:54
11,647
-18
16 Sept 2026, 14:40
11,665
-6
14 Sept 2026, 15:37
11,671
-2
13 Sept 2026, 03:01
11,673
-11
11 Sept 2026, 03:21
11,684
+5
8 Sept 2026, 07:35
11,679
-4
3 Sept 2026, 11:56
11,683
+4
2 Sept 2026, 07:35
11,679
-2
1 Sept 2026, 10:56
11,681
-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:54
11,685
+4
30 Aug 2026, 08:24
11,681
+5
29 Aug 2026, 05:33
11,676
-4
28 Aug 2026, 02:58
11,680
+2
26 Aug 2026, 23:25
11,678
+3
26 Aug 2026, 00:55
11,675
-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:04
11,676
+1
23 Aug 2026, 16:14
11,675
+3
22 Aug 2026, 05:28
11,672
-6
20 Aug 2026, 22:43
11,678
+1
18 Aug 2026, 20:06
11,677
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 11,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
24 (25 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
3,870
Reactions total
51
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
307 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
273
88.9%
🔥
16
5.21%
👍
10
3.26%
💯
8
2.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
分享两个今年SPM热门的主题,已经考完Percubaan的同学,可以利用最后两个月的时间,好好备考,加油!
Rusuhan Kaum
» https://youtu.be/u26ky-UaPjA?si=3AAzGzQNPgJIF948
Rukun Negara
» https://youtu.be/mkqcIUiYVGI?si=RShhcMDhFgDCYpcy
补习班目前进度:
FORM 1 BAB 7
FORM 2 BAB 9
FORM 3 BAB 7
FORM 4 BAB 8
FORM 5 BAB 8
🪧 2026 课程资讯👇
https://t.me/zhaosejarah/1968
📩 课程报名与咨询:
📱 WhatsApp 至 https://wa.me/message/RM7TKWDY226MO1
🌐 欢迎浏览网页了解更多详情:
https://yhidealacademy.com
《Percubaan 备考工具包4》🎁
以下内容是依据范围准备,并附上相关的复习视频。希望可以帮助备考中的大家。
给考生们的叮咛,以下内容只是范围,并不是TIPS❗️备考生们即使参考了以后,也要复习其他的内容,在有余力的情况下,尽量广泛复习。
F5 BAB 4 Kerjasama Kerajaan
(以下内容只是其中一个kerjasama,大家要通过课本把其他的kerjasama读完)
» https://youtu.be/bU-FUiSZFgA?si=vz437x3lBNyarwX0
F5 BAB 5 Malaysia
Rasional pembentukan Malaysia
» https://youtu.be/JwurYGiv8dc?si=1uZQpyC77sETGzRw
langkah pembentukan Malaysia
» https://youtu.be/YuKdHh1dxGA?si=jhayI9…
《Percubaan 备考工具包3》🎁
以下内容是依据学生提供的范围准备,赵老师也发来这里跟大家分享,附上相关的复习视频,希望可以帮助备考中的大家。
给考生们的叮咛,以下内容只是范围,并不是TIPS❗️备考生们即使参考了以后,也要复习其他的内容,在有余力的情况下,尽量广泛复习。
F4 BAB 7 & BAB 9
https://youtu.be/CVDGGGLn8eo?si=w__xXPBbmiBMpz9T
F4 BAB 8 Pilihan Raya 🌟🌟🌟
https://youtu.be/Qg3NCaJRj8s?si=9PCO0885Ow3JMGan
F4 BAB 9 Suruhanjaya Perlembagaan
https://youtu.be/rY_Pkj-oe1o?si=H1HYbMSccHgCk3NJ
F5 BAB 1 Kedaulatan
1.1 » https://youtu.be/jM-7aJm…
《Percubaan 备考工具包2》🎁
以下是PERCUBAAN值得关注的范围,附上相关的复习视,希望可以帮助备考中的大家。
备考生们即使参考了以后,也要复习其他的内容,在有余力的情况下,尽量广泛复习。
F4 BAB 1
ciri negara bangsa KMM
» https://youtu.be/WKd-dAgXutI?si=kG43n61_fE63-Vpm
Undang-undang » https://youtu.be/0vL7zGj7fZQ?si=YouT_aSn0iCiC3TW
Keunggulan Sistem Pentadbiran
» https://youtu.be/58A3mnl6WUU?si=AYU3ReiVWJBPJrEW
F4 BAB 2
Revolusi Keagungan » https://youtu.be/k0EH8bWY64Y?si=q0msgZ1KYbNDcZcr
Fil…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @zhaosejarah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
9. Antara berikut, tokoh manakah merupakan wakil Raja-raja Melayu dalam Jawatankuasa
Kerja?
I. Dato Hamzah Abdullah II. Haji Mohamad Sheriff Osman III. Dato Abdul Rahman Mohd Yassin IV. Haji Megat Yunus
A. I dan II34%
B. I dan IV18%
C. II dan III35%
D. III dan IV14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
5. Antara berikut, yang manakah faktor berlakunya Perang Dunia Pertama?
I. Persaingan kuasa imperialis
II. Pakatan ketenteraan III. Perselisihan faham IV. Mendapatkan barang mewah
A. I dan II82%
B. I dan IV10%
C. II dan III6%
D. III dan IV2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1. Apakah yang dimaksudkan dengan wilayah pengaruh?
A. Kawasan tanah jajahan dan takluk raja18%
B. Kawasan yang dinaungi oleh raja dan kerabatnya6%
C. Kawasan yang rakyatnya menerima dan memperakui pemerintahan seseorang raja72%
D. Kawasan yang rakyatnya menganggap raja sebagai tuhan atau wakil tuhan4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Chemistry Spmnetic!™ 🧪 @chemistryspmnotes · 37,872 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
Bank Soalan SPM @BankSoalanPeperiksaanSPM · 49,446 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
Cikgu Farhan Math 🇵🇸 #cikgufa @cikgufarhanmath · 44,295 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
Soalan Percubaan SPM ✍ @soalanpercubaanspm · 251,733 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
PerkasaSPM2024 | #JomBangkit @PerkasaSPM · 26,142 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
𝘕𝘖𝘛𝘈 & 𝘔𝘖𝘋𝘜𝘓 𝘚𝘗𝘔 𝘒𝘚𝘚𝘔 08 // 09 ♡︎ 🇲🇾🇵🇸 @spmstudytips · 108,839 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Bahasa Melayu Spmnetic!™ 📑 @bahasamelayuspmnotes · 50,458 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“赵老师带团学习-从SPM到毕业” (@zhaosejarah), 11,647 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhaosejarah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.