Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VIP资源共享

@zh_vip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,796subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001452469655
TypeChannel
Username@zh_vip
Description不定时免费更新高速节点,保证可用。分享一些优惠活动,限时活动,给大家提供一些福利等 内容均收集整理来自互联网,仅提供学习交流使用,不得用于商业用途,如有侵权请联系管理员删除 @lang00
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zh_vip

Growth

15,79515,83915,8176 August 2026 — 15,839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,836 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,824 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,813 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,805 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,798 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,795 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,796 subscribers15,7966 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,788–15,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:2415,796+1
11 Aug 2026, 22:1115,795-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:5515,798-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:3315,805-8
8 Aug 2026, 21:4015,813-11
7 Aug 2026, 23:3715,824-12
6 Aug 2026, 20:4515,836-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:0215,839first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.06%
avg views ÷ 15,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
799
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.175%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held25 (9 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,190
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,160
Videos
1
Links
1,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1392.9%
😱17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC470 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Cursor教程:快速入门到精通的AI辅助编程 以 Cursor 为核心,围绕 AI 辅助编程的基本使用思路与实际操作展开,适合希望了解 Cursor、尝试将其用于编程工作的学习者和开发者。内容从快速入门切入,逐步介绍软件使用过程中的常见方法与应用场景,便于读者建立对 Cursor 的整体认识,并在日常开发中参考使用。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #Cursor #AI编程 #编程工具

8 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC458 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

WorkBuddy教程:AI提效神器实战课 课程围绕 AI 提效神器 WorkBuddy 展开,内容涵盖基础操作、自定义技能入门等核心主题,帮助学习者了解软件的基本使用方式与技能配置思路。适合希望接触 WorkBuddy、提升日常工作效率,或需要从基础开始学习自定义技能的用户作为入门参考。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #WorkBuddy #AI提效 #实战课

8 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC409 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Cursor AI代码编辑器入门与进阶使用指南 本资源围绕 Cursor AI代码编辑器展开,内容适合初次接触 Cursor 的学习者,以及希望进一步了解其使用方式的开发者。通过入门到进阶的学习脉络,帮助读者建立对软件功能和 AI辅助编程场景的基本认识,逐步熟悉代码编辑器的使用思路,为后续开展相关编程学习与实践提供参考。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #Cursor #AI编程 #进阶学习

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC452 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

7 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC482 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

B站 - AE超能力学院入门到精通 方法论+案例课,萌新入门到精通。不知不觉get【 MAD vlog短片 专业视频设计 】新技能,中英文标示结合,适合任何版本的小伙伴,穿插学习思路 解决你的教程依赖症。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #学习 #AE #编程 #教程 #B站

31 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC829 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

1

24 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

20 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,460 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

AI编程训练营-cursor 零基础也能快速上手AI编程工具,通过Cursor实战项目带您从需求分析到代码生成一气呵成,掌握AI辅助编程的核心技巧,大幅提升开发效率,让编程不再是程序员的专利。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #学习 #AI #编程 #教程 #Cursor

3

17 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

10 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,820 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

鸿启-Seedance2.0超级个体训练营 鸿启-Seedance2.0超级个体训练营是一套面向追求突破性成长的个人而设计的系统化提升方案。课程以Seedance2.0核心方法论为驱动,深度融合认知升级、能力重塑与实战演练,帮助学员打破传统线性成长瓶颈,构建多维竞争力。通过密集训练与社群支持,参与者将掌握高效学习策略、个人品牌塑造及商业变现闭环,最终实现从普通到卓越的蜕变,成为具备持续进化力的超级个体。 下载链接:👉点这里👈 #quark #学习 #训练 #超级个体 #教程 #Seedance

3

10 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

7 Jul 2026, 00:54 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_939599423

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @zh_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 542,558 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIP资源共享” (@zh_vip), 15,796 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zh_vip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.